Quote:
Originally Posted by TurnPikeSpike
Those are not my claims in regards to HP, just to be transparent those numbers were directly copied and pasted from Tony Mamos website. Like I mentioned above the goal for this application was simply to remove the off-idle flat spot as well as gain a little better throttle response. Ported TB seem to be a very controversial topic in multiple forums. I have not been able to drive it yet so I honestly cannot tell you if it did either of those. I felt it was not beneficial to add a 95mm to a stock snout that would require a $200 adapter just to close back down to 85mm again. The parts added were merely to open the car up a little until I can do the full build at Vengeance again. I love the information on the forum and discussions like this just fuel my appetite for more knowledge on every front. Thank You Guys
|
So you did a 17% lower pulley and dyno tested it with Boostane to “remove the off-idle flat spot”…?!? I like how you think if so. 
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|