Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss
Those parameters were the only ones where I had entered those 2 values for mine.
|
I always need to know the why's on things... So my question is why dont we need to update all the tables that rely on MAP.
Kind of a random brainstorm here... hopefully my ravings make sense.
So, I think the answer is that you can update the MAP characteristics as described above, and it will read accurately without scaling other tables that rely on MAP.
What keeps from having to adjust all the tables that rely on MAP is the MAP Estimation Max/Min. In another forum, I read that any values above or below those values respectively will get "clipped" back to those values for reading form those tables.
So... with 3 bar reading... say 150 kpa will actually be truncated/clipped/whatever back to 105 for cross reffing in the tables...
Now, if I were to update those min/max values.... then I think there could be some table scaling required, as I imagine it will expect values in those tables that correspond to the actual values. Then again... however... even if those tables are NOT changed along with est max... I suspect that it would still use the highest/last values in the table. So if it tried to look up a value at 150kpa in a table, and the highest value/row in the table is 105kpa... then it would probably use that row.