View Single Post
Old 08-18-2020, 01:52 PM   #12
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinnAY View Post
Interesting viewpoint but you're applying a lot of heresay and then personal conjecture from some one (Al what's his face) that has no say in your car being warranted, or not, at a dealer. Too, The whole of point of GMPP selling parts is that they are THEIR parts, not roto-fab. That's a huge stretch of almost nothing based in reality that by extension your roto-fab is covered because they too sell a CAI or cat back or anything else.

You talk a lot smack on this subject but it's full of holes and none is based in fact.

No smack at all, I also emailed Al personally myself (my dad worked for GM so I was able to get Al's email address).

Legally GM cant allow the use of a dealer installed performance part and then deny coverage if the consumer chooses to purchase a similar performance part from a 3rd party manufacture. That is a huge reason behind and why the Magnuson Moss warranty act was implemented. It has also been argued and won that as long as the consumer only modifies the exhaust after the cats and past the post O2 sensors that it doesnt and wont change the power levels enough to invalidate the manufacture warranty.

I am 46 years old, have owned nothing but GM vehicles since I was 15 years old with plenty of them being new and modified along the way, have battled the battle with GM warranty coverage and won as well.

A CAI and a catback isnt going to change anything enough that the warranty wont cover the failure.
__________________
2019 Corvette Z06 2LZ A8 - Halltech CAI, AWE non-catted X-pipe, Mamo V2 ported TB 592rwhp, bone stock 566rwhp

2017 Camaro SS 1LE - Procharger D1SC w/ Tial 2" BOV & Race intercooler / ARH full length catless headers / Alky meth injection system - 650rwhp on conservative tune SOLD
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote