CAMARO6 - View Single Post

wookwook · 03-30-2020, 02:28 PM

Right. this gets loopy even for me. Also another correction the rear is 3.27 on the 4 and 6. I had parroted info I saw here. 2.77 is "less-far" away from 3.73 of the SS M6, that I referred to earlier. but 3.27 / 2.77 is still 80 mph at 2000 as I have now found the calculators and such. I could go 200 mph though.

"OMG, the Shelby uses a 4 banger trans... that's funny."

yeah that was a funny thing. PPl are reading GT 350 and think its carte blanche on loading it with twice the torsion load (tuned I4 and SC V6) as OK. and its not right cause you have much more torsion loading on the driven shaft with "shorter" gears.

Not a hellofalotta options out there.

03-30-2020, 02:28 PM	#12
wookwook Drives: 18 Camaro LS M6 Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: NH Posts: 698	Right. this gets loopy even for me. Also another correction the rear is 3.27 on the 4 and 6. I had parroted info I saw here. 2.77 is "less-far" away from 3.73 of the SS M6, that I referred to earlier. but 3.27 / 2.77 is still 80 mph at 2000 as I have now found the calculators and such. I could go 200 mph though. "OMG, the Shelby uses a 4 banger trans... that's funny." yeah that was a funny thing. PPl are reading GT 350 and think its carte blanche on loading it with twice the torsion load (tuned I4 and SC V6) as OK. and its not right cause you have much more torsion loading on the driven shaft with "shorter" gears. Not a hellofalotta options out there. __________________ . . . NFG M6 2T Mishimoto Hot side pie \| ZZP Catted DP \| KN Drop in \| Borla - Sport Tour \| Apex Arc 8 - square \| Wookster Tuning+ \| Flex Fuel Last PB 4.8, 13.2@106