Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
In the comparison they were talking about the GT500's interior up against the C8's interior tho. In which case the C8 at the price they tested it out at had a great interior. The GT500 at around the same C8 price had an interior that you would expect to see in a $30K Mustang. Matter of fact I think it was the 3LT they were comparing it to. And they upgraded the seats in the C8 if I'm correct. And the GT500 was around the same price but considerably lower quality.
In the case of the ZL1 tho, the ZL1 does not get as high in price as the GT500. And unless you add in BS stuff there is no way to get the ZL1 close to what a GT500 costs. On top of that the difference is that the GT gets downgraded lower trim level Mustang quality interior components while the lower trim level Camaros get upgraded ZL1 quality interior components. So the ZL1 is comparable to the SS because the SS is just that good. The SS is actually upgraded. The GT500 is comparable to the GT and lower trims because it is getting downgraded. And I assume that is because they had to sacrifice certain things to try to keep the costs lower.
|
I am not disagreeing with you at all. The point is very valid, especially when compared to to the C8. All I was saying was that that is a complaint that also registers with the ZL1. Some people were making it out like the ZL1 interior is like an Escalade levels of niceness compared to a SS or LT Camaro when that is not the case. or at least acting like it's an issue specific to the Mustang would probably be the better way to word it
Or at least to me it's a valid argument as well because none of the 3 pony cars interiors are what I would call impressive, especially once you get into the high dollar models.