Excellent. I'm eager to see if that ported 95 clears up the restriction around that power level. I know there's one claiming effective 102 or 103-flow, so it would seem to me that if it is assumed you have the flow of a 102, and don't see much improvement, than perhaps the restriction is then the snout. And if there is improvement, then the snout might just be good for about that power range.
You're helping me figure out the most effective way to get to where I want to be. I'd like to see about 700-RWHP (without going into the engine), and don't really want more (I won't turn it away though, HA). I know I can get that with a ported 1.7, but I want the cooling and efficiency of the 2650. AND... I want to keep close to CARB-status (swapping intakes is easy, and I don't want to swap pulleys if possible) because I have to, so if a ported 95 (stock appearing) on the standard snout (I already have a RF) can get me there, I'd prefer to save the money on the upgraded snout. I need to stay on 91, so I know I can't run E' unless I put a cam in it.
Or... I should talk to Ted, and see if a BOP will allow me to run E', and maybe eek a little more power out of him (maybe that might work for you, too). I'd like the flexibility of E' (since I can get it around here), so maybe a BOP will be good enough... Anyways...
Please keep us posted. And thanks for keeping our attention, HAHAHA. I still have to convince my better half I need a 2650, HAHAHA. She hasn't said no yet...
CARB-compliance and efficient use of mods' are what I'm after, and you're shedding light for me, so my continued "Thanks!!!"
