View Single Post
Old 12-17-2019, 09:25 AM   #5238
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
I don't see how high 11s is any different of an extreme or any less probable than high 10s. What MT runs is more in line with how these cars will perform unaltered off the showroom floor. These cars spend the vast majority of their life in this type of condition. A small fraction of them might spend a small fraction at a track where everything possible will be done to run the best time. So what is more practical?
When MT raced the Redeye they did on a prepped track and they were able to get 12.0 and an 11.8 with the car if that is the best that they could do with that car that is laughable, and those numbers should be treated the same way a hero lap would be. They way MT set up their race was unprofessional and that shows in the times

Cars does a great job of setting up a test of the Redeye and shows how a real test should be conducted and they were running low 11's and 10.86 a second faster than MT. MT is a joke if that is how they run their tests.


__________________
2017 Ram Copperhead
2015 Chrysler 200
2010 Challenger RT FF
1998 Monte Carlo SS
1980 Cutlass Supreme 403
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote