View Single Post
Old 10-08-2019, 08:54 AM   #35
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 13,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_6.2 View Post
455335 / (455+335) /2 x 100% = 30.37974683544304%
This may be correct numerically, but doesn't tell the real story. The V6 has much, much less torque in the low rpm range, and that is the only thing anyone ever feels in a daily commuter.

Real world-ish torque numbers, with a 15% drivetrain loss for the A8 with these two engines would look like this (of course each individual car will differ slightly, plus temperature, altitude, humidity etc. can skew it):

.......torque (lb-ft)
rpm.....LGX...LT1
1000...110...180
1500...160...268
2000...185...310
3000...215...360
4000...230...375
4500...235...385
5000...238...375

The V8 already exceeds the max torque of the V6 well under 1500 rpm, practically at low highway cruising speed in 8th gear. The peak diff when holding the go pedal down is about 60%.

There is no comparison in the sensation of power, really, and I had both these exact cars---but then again, this may not be what matters the most in a daily driver.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle Terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote