View Single Post
Old 05-01-2019, 01:01 PM   #14
Chadicus

 
Drives: 2017 2SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Billings MT
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
Mustang trunk: 13.5 cubic feet
Camaro trunk: 9.1 cubic feet
48.4% larger. I rounded up to 50%.

The 5.0 is in general slightly underrated at 460 hp. It makes more like 465-475 hp. I have seen some dyno 425 rwhp bone stock, which is like 480 hp.

In 2018 the Mustang had the "Safe and Smart" package (carried over to '19), which has pre-collision alert/assist and pedestrian awareness, audible collision warnings, adaptive cruise, auto high beams, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert, and lane keep assist/warning.

In 2018 the Camaro only had blind spot monitoring and rear cross traffic alert iirc. 2019 added front collision alert, but still lags way behind what is available in the Mustang.
There is a video where a stock SS put down 431 RWHP. I would take those dynos with a grain of salt honestly. Dynos are great tracking gains after mods but other than that they are just bar stool talking points.

I will agree that my Mustang was more "livable" than my Camaro. But I have a truck and SUV for that. I have friends with Mustangs some even with the GT* (LOL) honestly neither the Mustang or Camaro would suit me as a daily driver.

The one option the Mustang did not have that Camaro did and was a dealbreaker was a sunroof.
Chadicus is offline   Reply With Quote