View Single Post
Old 11-01-2018, 06:47 PM   #36
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss View Post
You seem to be misunderstanding my main point, which was agreeing with oldman. Actual hp determines how much fuel is being burned, not corrected hp. If you are at low altitude and get a correction factor like 1.03 on your dyno sheet, then you might not notice the discrepancy so much. But say that you are at higher altitude and get a sheet with a correction factor of 1.20, then obviously it's totally bogus to use that number as a basis of the fuel system's capacity. My focus here is not on internet hp (comparing dynos) it is just on using the most honest info that you have on how much power your car was making, and therefore how much of a demand it was placing on the fuel system.
Yep. I misunderstood your point. Fair enough. I was simply saying that with a high degree of certainty, with all of the people posting on the forum, we run out of fuel at approximately the same levels of adjusted HP. . .but I understand your point and perhaps that isn’t the case with someone in extreme elevation.
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance

Last edited by Drsagacity; 11-01-2018 at 10:43 PM.
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote