|
That looks like the same dyno that I got owned on. Its a Dynocom dyno, from what I can tell. They're load bearing dyno's and unless he set the load percentage correctly for a RWD car (assuming that the dyno is an AWD dyno), it's going to have some really rough numbers. The correction factor on that dyno should be at 1.04, not 1.11/1.10.
On my runs, the first pull was set for an AWD load and I ended up putting down some abysmal numbers. He changed the settings to be dialed in for a RWD car. Also, you were put in the wrong gear. 5th or 6th gear would have been more appropriate for an accurate dyno run. I would think that with a proper run, even on those dyno's, you'd probably be around 370-390 as a baseline on there. No matter what, the numbers are going to be lower than every other dyno other than a Mustang dyno. It's just the nature of the beast.
I attached my sheet as an example.
__________________
2018 Audi TT ▊RS
2.4X 0-60, 1.6X 60', 120+mph 1/8th, 4.XX 60-130, 150+mph traps on 255/35/18 R888R tires on the street (unprepped).
2019 Audi RS3
About as fast as the TT RS
2019 Camaro ZL1 1LE
Sold
2018 Camaro SS 1LE
Sold
2019 Corvette Z06
Sold
2021 Charger Hellcat Redeye Widebody
Sold
|