View Single Post
Old 09-20-2018, 03:46 PM   #13
ninetres

 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Drives: Crush ZLE M6 | 2000 Corvette FRC
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cencal
Posts: 1,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by NM-ZR1 View Post
Thanks for that, so I could simply swap it out and I should not have any issues with codes from the change, correct? (Or should I buy a MAF for each unit so I don't have to relocate it?
Correct. No maf relocation required for an intake swap. Rotofab and KN do not throw codes at all. Can’t speak for other intakes because I just don’t know, and some other are designed to be retuned for.

Additionally, I encourage all in this discussion to actually read the MM act, as well as any legal explanation of it.....as it’s obvious nobody has. The act SPECIFICALLY places the legal burden of proof on a dealership to prove the aftermarket part contributed to the failure that was denied. This isn’t me speculating, it’s the black and white of the act we are discussing. I understand no body wants to end up in this perdiciment of playing the warranty blame game with a dealership.....but that concern is the EXACT reason the suit was brought forward and the precedent was set: so that dealers can’t deny repairs without proof.

Last edited by ninetres; 09-20-2018 at 03:56 PM.
ninetres is offline   Reply With Quote