View Single Post
Old 07-21-2018, 09:32 AM   #38
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDP Sales View Post
We made 772/788 wheel on LT4 fueling running E60 and single nozzle meth. We weren't out of fuel yet either but i'm sure we were close.

We're now on twins like Jessrayo. We have added the DSX Auxiliary low-side to aid us in fuel delivery and we plan to make 950 wheel on LT4+Meth+DSX Lowside. We are of the opinion that much over that without adding port injection isn't super wise. If it were wise to do big bore and just do that much power on Direct Injection, GM would have done it on the ZR1. Port Injection has other benefits besides more fuel. Just some food for thought.

Let me know if I can be of any assistance.

All the best,

Jared Royce
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldman View Post
Good point, there has to be a point where dual inject just works better.
It may be the perception because GM did it it must be better.

But you must take in to account that Manufactures make decisions based on available technology and cost involved, it may be just cheaper to add port injection rather than redesign the direct injection then get it through the EPA when they can use already approved systems and just stack them.

You will make more power and more reliable power with Direct injection than Port injection.

The Parts are coming you just have to be patient

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote