Quote:
Originally Posted by Childs Play
I compared it to the ATS sedan. Not the Camaro. Compared to the ATS the Nissan Versa trumps it on leg room.
However, you're right, the Versa is an absolutely ugly little shit box as far as looks and performance go. But, I didn't buy a Nissan Versa thinking it was a car that I could look cool in or drive on a track. I bought it because I'm a cheap ass when it comes to DDs and, surprisingly could fit four 6'2"+ adults rather comfortably if needed.
Nissan makes the GTR. It can fit four full sized adults. Not comfortably, but it's not supposed to. Just like the Camaro really isn't either. Although I'd argue that the Camaro has less leg room than the GTR.
I bought the Camaro on the other hand, for a fun weekend car. I have two other vehicles for trips with more than two people if needed.
|
Wow, I didnt realize the Nissan versa has more room inside than a ATS sedan. I know the caddy roof line is lower (better looks) but rear leg room shouldn't be tighter unless the low roof line doesn't allow caddy to push the rear seat farther back.
Regarding the GTR, I would have to have the length , width , height specs because the car is heavy compared to a Camaro so its dimensions maybe bigger allowing for more room. IMO, most of the Camaro enthusiasts would sacrifice room for less weight, I sure as hell do.
All in all I do agree the Camaro roof could be 2 inches higher, the front and back glass could be equally taller or 2 inches closer to the roof center line and the belt line dropped 2 inches. Better visibility, a little more room with virtually same outside dimensions and same weight.