Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
Like I care what you think. Removing sway bars is the first thing these guys do when they wanna run a good time on a "stock" Mustang. Go on the YT video. Even one of his close buddies and several other Mustang guys thought he removed the sway bar. Were they all lying too?
|
Yes! Just as you did!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
I don't believe a GD thing out of MM&FF. I had a subscription to that mag for about 5 or more years. I had boxes of articles sitting around. Everything out of that magazine was either a lie, an exaggeration, made up, or complete bullshit. So no, I don't believe any enthusiast mag. How many times do I have to tell you that? And where did I align myself? They thought along the same lines as I did and some of them were close to the source.
|
How about Hot Rod magazine?
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/drag-...rd-mustang-gt/
You have some serious trust issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
You did. You declared the GT would be faster because Evans ran an 11.8 and Lund did a 12 flat despite all the SS guys who had done those times. You were comparing those times to the mag runs where the SS did 12.3-12.4 and that was the info you went off of. I told you it would do mid 12 at best which you argued against. What did it run again?
|
There you go making stuff up again. Go ahead, find where where I declared the GT would be faster. You'll be a while...and will come up empty.
Ditto with comparing the 11.8 to SS mag runs. Never happened.
In M6 form, everyone (myself included) thought it would go mid 12's when tested by the popular magazines. Low 12's will be had with the A10. You're just pulling things out of every orifice now aren't you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
I flat out said that to you and every troll on here every time you said I ignored Evans runs. I straight up told you that if you consider that run then it has to be compared to the YT and fast times and NOT the mag times. I said that time and time again on here.
|
And again, no one is arguing this. Evans runs absolutely should be compared to the fast list here....they are both dragstrip runs. Why are you even arguing this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
It ran a 12.6 which is NOT what you were expecting. You were expecting a low 12. And others were expecting high 11s to low 12s.
|
Total BS. Myself and nearly everyone on M6G was expecting mid 12's from the M6, as the horsepower alone wasn't going to be enough to drop it past that. Again, I don't know where you're getting your info, but you're dead wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
It was nowhere close. The SS ran a best of 12.3 and that is more than a tenth faster than the best 18 GT time.
|
Dude, stop using BS comparisons of car and driver 1/4 mile times to 18 GT times when motortrend did an actual same day test of the two. M6 vs M6 they are 0.1 apart...get over it already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
In fact the A10 GT hasn't even beat the M6 SS. And I'm betting the M6 GT will do a high 12.
|
WTF dude lol, motortrend already tested the M6 GT to mid 12's. A stock 15-17 did high 12's. Too funny.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
Point proven yet again. So the only time it is acceptable to manipulate the data is when you do it or only when it makes the GT look better eh?
|
And still you don't fundamentally understand the difference. And you still have yet to pony up that a tire and tune 18GT can run Zl1 times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
Why are you conveniently ignoring that 2 testers on DRs could not do better than a low 12? Why are you ignoring that something is fishy as hell with the Evans run and the rest of the runs? Why are you ignoring that even Lund's run was suspect?
|
None are ignore them, they are ALL data points. Some suck at driver, others have bad days, bad track prep etc. As for Lund's run, they were perhaps the most documented 1/4 runs I have ever seen. Why would I doubt the most reputable tuner in the mustang community? What does he have to gain by running a fantastic stock 1/4 mile? If anything else, he would sandbag and make his tune look better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
Got me? LOL! What's there to get. I call bullshit on the run. Just like I call bullshit on 95% of the content from MM&FF. The dude writes magazine articles and the purpose is to sell magazines. And the whole thing was a Mustang press/fluff circus anyway.
|
Funny, all magazines sole purpose is to sell more magazines. You conveniently discredit what you want to in a vein attempt to argue.