Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
I never jumped on any bandwagon. I was the first person on this forum to say that he removed the swaybar.
|
So you were the first person than to make up lies about the run...brilliant defense on your behalf.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
That is an old Mustang trick. And for the record there were several YTers who also said the same thing.
|
And again, so you fail to believe a trusted magazine writer and instead align yourself with like-minded YTers who make shit up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
My gripe was that people like yourself tried to compare Evans run to the magazine times of the SS because it made the GT look good.
|
Never, not once have I compared a 1/4 mile run done on a dragstrip to runs done by magazines. Man you're great at making things up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
I flat out told you that if you consider Evans run then you have to consider it in comparison to the Camaro runs on YT also in which case there were some in the 11.8 range.
|
No one is arguing with you on this...you didn't "flat out tell" anyone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
The GT turned around and did exactly what I said it would do much to your chagrin.
|
The GT did exactly as everyone was expecting...it ran neck and neck and only a 1/10th slower than a camaro with an M6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
And I don't GAF about Evans. I don't know him. I never heard of him before he did the 18 GT runs. And I don't care how respected he is in Mustang world or what he accomplished. It means nothing to me.
|
LOL, he's not just respected in the mustang world, he's also respected throughout the camaro community and has written for both ford and chevy magazines as well as hot rod. He has set record times in camaro's and corvettes. You not knowing of him shows how disconnected you are from the automotive community.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
WTF are you talking about? I just said that the GT was slower and that it did a 12.6. You're losing your marbles kid. I said that if you take the fastest SS run (12.3), then it is faster than the best GT run (12.5 if I remember) as both were officially tested.
|
What you did was take the fastest run done by car and driver for the SS and compare it against the only run done by any reputable magazine for the mustang. Not only do they not use the same pavement for the runs, but the don't necessarily even correct for the same conditions.
On the same day, with the same magazine...the SS and GT are 0.1 seconds apart. Quit trying to manipulate data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
And again, you had no issues comparing modded GT runs on different days and at different tracks to our ZL1 fast list runs.
|
Who brought the ZL1 vs modded GT argument back up? Who still hasn't admitted that a tune/tire GT is capable of running ZL1 times based off of proof?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
So now all of a sudden when it doesn't suit you it isn't fair right?
|
I can't believe you can't see the difference in comparison. I'll explain it to you. A tune/tire MY18 GT has never line up against a stock ZL1. The only numbers we can compare are from the ZL1 fast list. A stock GT and SS has actually been run head to head...and you chose to NOT use the head to head numbers and instead use numbers from completely different magazines to make your argument look better. Sad really.