Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe
To be fair I would consider the LX and GT different models because they were different body styles lol. The LX was a notch and the GT a hatch
|
Same car tho :P It's kind of like the standard Monte Carlo SS and the Monte Carlo Aerocoupe... same car, different rear window/hatch area..
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSfriendly
Kind of line the same nannies that the M6 GT has had since 2015?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they shouldn't....only that (for it's intended purpose), the A10 doesn't offer a significant advantage over the M6 in the ZL1 1LE.
|
Actually, the issues are present in both the M6 and A10 ZL1/ZL1-1LE. The A10 just has it show up less. Additionally, the A10 has routinely put about 3/4's to a full second difference on the 1/4 mile times...
And just for giggles, there are plenty of people who would prefer the 1LE in a A10 to auto-x or road course run. It's got a different suspension and some people would like to play with it. Again, the main advantages of adding the A10 are purely for straight line speed, namely drag racing... and that is an advantage the A10 would have...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSfriendly
If that's the case, then the camaro in v8 form offers a SS and ZL1...as the 1LE would then be considered only options.
Any way you cut it, the mustang has always offered more.
|
How exactly so?
If we use your logic (GT, GT PP1, GT PP2, Bullitt, GT350, GT350R) all the same as a GT. So you have the GT and the upcoming GT500.
We have the SS and the ZL1.
Look, I understand that some models have different features or slightly better performance, but a lot of these models were the same car with minor differences. I would call a GT PP a different model than the basic GT. However, I certainly wouldn't call the GT California edition a different GT. There's simply not enough of a difference to truly make them a different model.