Quote:
Originally Posted by Nabush
The thing is the Mustang is an in between the Camaro and the Challenger.
It performs as well as the Camaro/challenger in straight line (for the 2018 model), is slower on a roadcourse than the Camaro but faster than the challenger, but sufficiently fast and composed to give fun on a mountain road at a fast pace.
It’s more liveable as a daily than the camaro (don’t know for the challenger)
By the way How many of you go to the limit of your cars ?
For you living in NJ which roads do you have to touch/approach the limits of your ZL1 ?
I live myself of the bottom of the 15miles/6000 ft elevation Hillclimb where i can do it (and also on roadcourses, was living near Le Mans and other famous French roadcourses where i raced, now i need to go farther ...) but i’m very lucky to have such roads....
That’s why Mustang sells well, performance is good, accessible and sufficient for most people.
|
More liveable? Well that is debatable. I don't think it is. They are exactly the same when it comes to liveability (I just made that word up). And I admit that the Mustang is OK at best. Good enough? Nope. Well maybe for some but not for me. Not until the GT500 comes out. But we're not discussing what is sufficient. This is about which one is better. And it ain't the Mustang. it's the cars with "truck" engines.
I don't push my car to it's limit at all. I baby it. I find that I am satisfied with what it gives me back and that is with me not pushing it. It can give me soo much more than I could ever care to use and I'm fine with that.