CAMARO6

CAMARO6 (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/index.php)
-   2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=155)
-   -   Anyone else concerned with LT engine issues during magazine testing (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=425097)

vtirocz 10-01-2015 11:05 AM

Anyone else concerned with LT engine issues during magazine testing
 
Most recently the Z06 had major engine related issues during Motor Trend's Best Driver's car comparison. A 2014 Stingray blew an engine during Car and Driver's lightning lap. And C&Ds long term 2014 Stingray blew an engine.

What's going on here?!?

I'm a little bit concerned that the LT1/4 are not as reliable/durable as the LS3. I never recall magazines having any engine related issues with the LS3, but seems to be a trend with the LT engines. I'm hoping they get these issues sorted out quickly!

kain279 10-01-2015 11:32 AM

I think one was due to a faulty oil filter, no fault of the engine.

That's why I never buy Fram--they have grenaded plenty of perfectly good engines.

brutusvk 10-01-2015 11:37 AM

This was addressed months ago. Had to do with metal getting into the filter. They recommended all new stingrays basically do an oil change immediately after taking delivery or 500 miles. (Or something like that)

mt3130 10-01-2015 11:38 AM

This is why your have a warranty. It may have been an issue early on, but I haven't heard much about it recently.

If you are concerned, get an extended warranty if you plan on keeping your car a long time.

vtirocz 10-01-2015 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kain279 (Post 8663649)
I think one was due to a faulty oil filter, no fault of the engine.

That's why I never buy Fram--they have grenaded plenty of perfectly good engines.

I'm skeptical that the oil filter was the real assignable cause of the engine failures. That seems like a PR response to downplay the issue and make it seem like it's not a big deal.

vtirocz 10-01-2015 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mt3130 (Post 8663664)
This is why your have a warranty. It may have been an issue early on, but I haven't heard much about it recently.

If you are concerned, get an extended warranty if you plan on keeping your car a long time.

The most recent issue of Z06 running poorly during the Best Driver's Car comparison just happened. The article is now on Motor Trend's site.

Hopefully they get everything sorted out ASAP.

BahamaTodd 10-01-2015 12:01 PM

Motor Trend track video:
https://youtu.be/dguUQUq8JL8

Randy was very disappointed.

BahamaTodd 10-01-2015 12:05 PM

The Mercedes-AMG GT S won btw.

Denis 10-01-2015 12:44 PM

it is a little unsettling

Waiting46 10-01-2015 12:54 PM

they explained that it was an issue with the tapping of the oil filter threads (when they actually cut the threads in to the block) the cleaning process was not as thorough as it should have been, leaving metal flakes in the oil that caused the issue. Sounds totally reasonable from a manufacturing standpoint, if a huge issue from a QC standpoint.

fastball 10-01-2015 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mt3130 (Post 8663664)
This is why your have a warranty. It may have been an issue early on, but I haven't heard much about it recently.

If you are concerned, get an extended warranty if you plan on keeping your car a long time.

This mentality isn't the best. I submit that a well engineered, well built engine should last 200,000+ miles with proper recommended, scheduled maintenance.

Blackdevil77 10-01-2015 01:03 PM

Yes it's unsettling. I was hoping they'd have the kinks worked out by now.

The Z06 story recently is very disappointing and embarrassing. They really need to do something about the LT4.

Suntan 10-01-2015 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BahamaTodd (Post 8663702)
Motor Trend track video:
https://youtu.be/dguUQUq8JL8

Randy was very disappointed.

That's really odd, isn't it? Why would GM send MT a car that Randy concludes is obviously faulty?? Surely GM would have engineers on-site to address these concerns (maybe ask for another run!) since this is a pretty influential magazine...

vtirocz 10-01-2015 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suntan (Post 8663832)
That's really odd, isn't it? Why would GM send MT a car that Randy concludes is obviously faulty?? Surely GM would have engineers on-site to address these concerns (maybe ask for another run!) since this is a pretty influential magazine...

The article states that GM techs were on site and could not figure out what the problem was. That's really embarrassing!

"So it was disappointing to see Big Nasty sidelined by a mysterious engine problem not even the GM techs on hand could figure out."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.