CAMARO6

CAMARO6 (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/index.php)
-   V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=231)
-   -   PRAY Ported Heads (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=501093)

slick3 07-10-2017 01:19 PM

PRAY Ported Heads
 
Brett was kind enough to let me get the first pair of PRAY PERFORMANCE ported cylinder heads. Im currently in the middle of the install right now. Both ported heads are on the car its just a matter of getting the rest of the mess back together during my busy work week.

Guys, I cant say enough about Bretts work. Not only does he do top flight porting, he has been extremely helpfull with the install and making sure I get it done correctly. Always willing to help and offer advice. I cant wait to see what this car car do in its final form.

The install is not easy if you have never done it before, I wont sugar coat it.

Anyway, results to come after I get it back together and retune it.

I will leave you with a few pictures, although poor quality. Sorry.

http://i.imgur.com/n4GIOg9.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/4qOAjGS.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/qppzmyk.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/dzKHfqK.jpg

BowtieRocket 07-10-2017 01:30 PM

:emoticon12:Excellent...

Ryephile 07-10-2017 02:11 PM

Oooooh really nice! I look forward to reading your impressions for how they feel. Any before/after dyno's by chance?

Are you keeping the stock cam, valves, and springs? Just the porting change?

Thanks!
Ryan

slick3 07-10-2017 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryephile (Post 9811305)
Oooooh really nice! I look forward to reading your impressions for how they feel. Any before/after dyno's by chance?

Are you keeping the stock cam, valves, and springs? Just the porting change?

Thanks!
Ryan

I'm keeping stock everything. Just swapping the heads over. I do have some before dynos and I will be getting some afters as soon as I get the car back together and tuned. It's about 107 out today so dumping the car right now wouldn't be a fair comparison either way. Will absolutely post impressions after everything is sorted out.

I want to maintain stock drivability but make more power and this was about the last thing I could do outside of cam the car. I'm really excited to see how it feels. I can tell you that having both heads laying side by side you can see all the areas that Brett worked over, they are SMOOTH compared to the very rough and pourous nature of the stock ones.

BradfordCamaro 07-10-2017 02:39 PM

nice...
So that what Heads look like....

slick3 07-10-2017 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradfordCamaro (Post 9811374)
nice...
So that what Heads look like....

Sorry, im not a great picture taker and for me to try and get pictures of the porting inside the runners is impossible with an iphone. They are nice.

BradfordCamaro 07-10-2017 06:09 PM

No,no... :)
Was not a comment on your photography skills. But I can see why you thought so. It is kinda funny though...

PRAY 07-10-2017 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradfordCamaro (Post 9811693)
No,no... :)
Was not a comment on your photography skills. But I can see why you thought so. It is kinda funny though.

My comment is more along the lines that you actually got your heads.

Just to clarify. Bradford is NOT waiting for heads from me.

PRAY 07-10-2017 06:54 PM

Nick, glad you are happy so far. It is great that you got the first set. Can't wait for your impressions once you are up and running. I am confident you will be happier than you are now. I appreciate the nice words. You have been an exceptional customer to deal with. Providing help is the easy part. Just glad I could be part of your build.

BradfordCamaro 07-10-2017 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRAY (Post 9811752)
Just to clarify. Bradford is NOT waiting for heads from me.

Sorry...
Didn't mean to mess up this thread. I'll go now:doh:

Yes. Pray Performance. Solid parts. Great guy. :clap2:

PRAY 07-10-2017 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradfordCamaro (Post 9811820)
Sorry...
Didn't mean to mess up this thread. I'll go now:doh:

Yes. Pray Performance. Solid parts. Great guy. :clap2:

No worries brother. I just didn't want people think I was the source of your current issues. I really wish you were able to make it to the Fest.

ULTRAZLS1 07-11-2017 12:17 AM

Good luck man. Enjoy.

I plan on a set down the road when I do a cam. PRAY is the man.

Still torn between a big cam and converter deep into the tens or a mild cam stock converter consistent mid to high tens...
I feel like a mild cam with some milling and thinner gaskets could get decently close to a large cam and sacrifice very little drive ability

I also dabble in roll racing from time to time and the stock converter may be better for this...

What kind/size of cam do you suggest with these heads pray?

PRAY 07-11-2017 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 (Post 9812251)
Good luck man. Enjoy.

I plan on a set down the road when I do a cam. PRAY is the man.

Still torn between a big cam and converter deep into the tens or a mild cam stock converter consistent mid to high tens...
I feel like a mild cam with some milling and thinner gaskets could get decently close to a large cam and sacrifice very little drive ability

I also dabble in roll racing from time to time and the stock converter may be better for this...

What kind/size of cam do you suggest with these heads pray?

Thanks buddy. I would really like to get a set of my heads on your car. Another guy that races would be awesome to back up my current results.

A converter won't hurt your roll racing. Once you click over to manual mode you are all locked up. It is just like putting it on the dyno. You can also adjust your converter lock up mph to cover down on roll racing speeds.

Any cam above 223 intake duration will usually require enough idle rpm that it will pull on a stock converter. I am not sure how the A8 stock converter fares with this but that is about the limit for all the GM converters before it.

My heads flow enough air and high enough into the lift range to handle any cam you want to throw at them. However, I am not sure on cam specs yet. It appears that there is not nearly as much PTV as I was originally lead to believe in this motor. This severely limits how far forward we can advance the IVO/IVC. The IVC directly effects the DCR we can get and therefore effects the tq we will be able to produce and where in the rpm band we can make it. Given the flow characteristics of my heads I have had the best luck running cams with a tight lobe separation 110-111 and a 6*-8* split on duration. Advance is now the issue. I would say that running a bit of advance and using the computer to retard the cam would be best. But again there is the PTV issue. We are also finding out now that there are cam retard control issues with valve spring pressure overcoming the cam phaser. I have seen this first hand on the dyno with unexplained tq dips in the curve. Once we logged cam retard we found out that cam was not following the commanded retard at all. It was retarding the cam up to 5* in certain spots for no reason. Some manufactures are now offering 0*-4* limiter blocks now vs. the 25* block that comes with the comp phaser limiter kit. We are assuming that the oil pressure and spring in the stock cam phaser can't overcome the spring pressure required to run the cams being produced right now.

I still can't wrap my head around the wide lobe sep we are seeing with most of the cam manufactures right now but no one seems to want to have a conversation about it. It seems like a double whammy to me for tq production down low. I feel it would be much better to run a tighter lobe sep with no advance than run a wide lobe sep and some advance.. There must be a definitive IVO that will maintain the minimum PTV. The other issue is ramp rate. By degreeing different cam manufactures cams there is a definite difference in ramp rates. It is the .020"-.050' that seems to be the issue for PTV with some cams and not others. So duration and IVO aren't the only issues to plan around. I will figure it out eventually with a buddy of mine and then come out with my own line of cams to match my head porting.

Dubchitts 07-11-2017 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRAY (Post 9812348)
Thanks buddy. I would really like to get a set of my heads on your car. Another guy that races would be awesome to back up my current results.

A converter won't hurt your roll racing. Once you click over to manual mode you are all locked up. It is just like putting it on the dyno. You can also adjust your converter lock up mph to cover down on roll racing speeds.

Any cam above 223 intake duration will usually require enough idle rpm that it will pull on a stock converter. I am not sure how the A8 stock converter fares with this but that is about the limit for all the GM converters before it.

My heads flow enough air and high enough into the lift range to handle any cam you want to throw at them. However, I am not sure on cam specs yet. It appears that there is not nearly as much PTV as I was originally lead to believe in this motor. This severely limits how far forward we can advance the IVO/IVC. The IVC directly effects the DCR we can get and therefore effects the tq we will be able to produce and where in the rpm band we can make it. Given the flow characteristics of my heads I have had the best luck running cams with a tight lobe separation 110-111 and a 6*-8* split on duration. Advance is now the issue. I would say that running a bit of advance and using the computer to retard the cam would be best. But again there is the PTV issue. We are also finding out now that there are cam retard control issues with valve spring pressure overcoming the cam phaser. I have seen this first hand on the dyno with unexplained tq dips in the curve. Once we logged cam retard we found out that cam was not following the commanded retard at all. It was retarding the cam up to 5* in certain spots for no reason. Some manufactures are now offering 0*-4* limiter blocks now vs. the 25* block that comes with the comp phaser limiter kit. We are assuming that the oil pressure and spring in the stock cam phaser can't overcome the spring pressure required to run the cams being produced right now.

I still can't wrap my head around the wide lobe sep we are seeing with most of the cam manufactures right now but no one seems to want to have a conversation about it. It seems like a double whammy to me for tq production down low. I feel it would be much better to run a tighter lobe sep with no advance than run a wide lobe sep and some advance.. There must be a definitive IVO that will maintain the minimum PTV. The other issue is ramp rate. By degreeing different cam manufactures cams there is a definite difference in ramp rates. It is the .020"-.050' that seems to be the issue for PTV with some cams and not others. So duration and IVO aren't the only issues to plan around. I will figure it out eventually with a buddy of mine and then come out with my own line of cams to match my head porting.

If you get it all ironed out I would love to do a pray heads/cam package! Seriously man, you are amazing to this community


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.