Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2015, 05:18 PM   #57
obzidian
 
obzidian's Avatar
 
Drives: 98 camaro turbo
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami
Posts: 293
No need to worry...

The gt350r is also a low production vehicle which will, more than likely, carry a high sticker price.

The way i see.. this is what we'll get:

1. 1LE for everyday track folks. Similar to the SS but more track focused.

2. ZL1: LT4 car with hopefully enough power to stay competitive with the Hellcat and GT500.

3. Z28 low production, max effort "streetcar". The engine will/should be NA and if im not mistaken i believe Tag said they had a no frills NA LT1 engine. Hopefully something like that with a 7k rpm range to get to the 500hp+ range.

That is how i would do it if i was king!
__________________
.....
obzidian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 05:25 PM   #58
obzidian
 
obzidian's Avatar
 
Drives: 98 camaro turbo
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami
Posts: 293
You cannot base the z28's success on sales alone. It was noted to be a low production unit anyways so what is the point.

The real story is that the z28 is that it time and time again has beaten cars on a race track that are much much faster in a straightline. The car is a track weapon and one that many (still doubt) doubted GM could produce out of a camaro.

The z28's success is the reason there even is a Gt350R. it is the General doing what it does best.... producing a car that rips up the competition, especially cars that cost 2 to 3 times as much.

So no... the z28 is not a failure, it is infact the very reason some auto manufactures arent sleeping well at night.
__________________
.....
obzidian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 05:53 PM   #59
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
What if they offered up a 500hp lt1 z/28 option but without the other spec only parts? Like a boss 302 was for ford. Maybe they could swap out cams for more rpm and a little less low end.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 07:12 PM   #60
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
Changing cams will require a whole new set of durability testing, EPA and SAE testing and certification..many millions of dollars.

Sure a cammed LT1 could easily hit 515+ HP but can it do that while meeting all of the previous requirements?
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 07:16 PM   #61
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Unless it failed to meet GM's targets, its hard to classify it as a failure. And GMs targets aren't necessarily limited to sales numbers of that model. If it nearly met their sales goal, but drastically exceeded their showroom traffic goal it would still be a success in GMs eyes. A halo car is about selling the entire lineup, not selling itself.

And GM doesn't have to wait until there is something beating the Camaro to greenlight something more. They know that there are people out there who want more than a regular SS, regardless of how good it is. If nothing else, those buyers will want to beat other Camaros.

No. The ZL1 was going to be a Z28 but the Camaro folks realized that it did not fit with what a Z28 should be, so they revived the ZL1 moniker and went to work on a track focused monster.


There isn't really any advantage in using the LF4 for the Z/28. Actually, in many ways its probably worse. Its heavier, the mass is located higher up, won't have the same sort of throttle response as an NA engine, susceptible to heat soak, likely costs substantially more. And for what, gaining 11 hp while losing 11 ft-lbs of torque?

I wouldn't put it past them to be working on something, either a spiritual successor to the gen III LS6 or the gen IV LS7 would make a lot of sense a mid-level engine in Camaros and Corvettes

The engine itself is a few grand more. The brakes are substantially more. The tires are an extra grand for a set themselves. The suspension ... It all adds up. If it isn't worth it to you, thats fine. It doesn't have to be. Thats why there was the SS (plus the 1LE package), the ZL1, and the Z/28 for the 5th gen. Different cars for different buyers.

The problem is that there is only a small market of people who want a super track star Camaro. GM could have watered it down and dropped the price by 30 grand and sold a lot more, but why bother? At that point, you've basically gotten down to a 1LE.
Ahhhhhhhhhh, relaxing in the brilliance. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 07:20 PM   #62
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
So write this down.

There will be one of two possibilities. 1) GM has something very special in the wings for a Z/28 powertrain. LTx we'll call it. Something that make Ford embarrassed that they created a flat crank hand grenade or 2) GM uses the LT4 at 640/650 HP and looses about 200 to 300 pounds from the SS ANNNNNNNND adds CC brakes and Trofe tires.

This also assumes that GM has an LT4 powered Camaro that is actually standard weight PLUS the weight of the LT4 etc. to compete with the GT500.

So to remove 2 to 300 pounds will be a chore with a lot of what was done to the current Z/28 and what was done to the Malibu (arguably already done to the Camaro) and a crap load of Carbon Fiber and Magnesium and Aluminium.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 07:31 PM   #63
KaBoom1701
KaBoom1701
 
KaBoom1701's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmyers View Post
Why would GM not install the same motor being used in the ATS-V for the Z/28? Its a twin turbo V6 and actually fits quite nicely in the historic theme of the 1st generation Z/28. That leaves the some variant of the LT4 for use in the ZL1.

If the Z/28 was a failure in sales figures, the failure was overestimating how many customers would buy one, but lets hope that GM does NOT stop pushing the bar. By all accounts it is an amazing performance car, competing with brands and models that it should not be.

So I think both Z's can exist. GM definitely has the platform and motors in place today to make it happen. The question is will there be enough of a market to support both? I think so. Thats one benefit of having components and platforms that can be shared across brands and models.

We already know the base car is 200lb lighter. How much lighter could the Z/28 be? Look at what the 5th gen Z/28 accomplished with the LS7. Older technology accomplishing great track times through brute force and some technical wizardry going on under the sheet metal. I personally hope the performance group at GM has some more surprises in store.

Worst case scenario, perhaps we will see 0% financing on the Z/28 If that hasn't already happened.

Ron

Winner!
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats.
KaBoom1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 08:21 PM   #64
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
The original Z/28 was designed to race SCCA's Trans Am series, and GM had to sell a certain number to the public. The class was limited to 5000cc (5.0L 305CID), so GM made a lower displacement race engine. It was smaller lighter and high revving.

Gen 5, and GM was going to call the ZL1 the Z/28, but realized that the ZL1 did not live up to the original heritage, and renamed it. That brought up the idea of an LS7 Z/28 true to it's heritage. But with those pricy components, I think the Z/28 lost market share to the cheaper ZL1 (which had lots more power and more everyday liveable).

In order to do this right, GM would do a LT4 ZL1. That's a no brainer. But the Z/28... l think you have to stay N/A to stay true to the heritage. A high revving LT1 variation with racing heads/cam/exhuast, etc. is a good argument to make. It could also be more competitively priced (with the ZL1). BUT, if GM goes that route, can the Gen6 Z/28 live up the Gen5?? Big questions.
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 08:29 PM   #65
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
So write this down.

There will be one of two possibilities. 1) GM has something very special in the wings for a Z/28 powertrain. LTx we'll call it. Something that make Ford embarrassed that they created a flat crank hand grenade or 2) GM uses the LT4 at 640/650 HP and looses about 200 to 300 pounds from the SS ANNNNNNNND adds CC brakes and Trofe tires.

This also assumes that GM has an LT4 powered Camaro that is actually standard weight PLUS the weight of the LT4 etc. to compete with the GT500.

So to remove 2 to 300 pounds will be a chore with a lot of what was done to the current Z/28 and what was done to the Malibu (arguably already done to the Camaro) and a crap load of Carbon Fiber and Magnesium and Aluminium.
Dropping 2-300 lbs off the SS would put the LT4 Camaro right on top of the Z06 and GM will never let that happen, even if it was possible. Plus, people were bitching about a $75k Z/28. That car would clear 6 figures.

The most likely Z car is an LT4 powered Z/28 around 3950 lbs and set up like the 5th gen ZL1.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 08:37 PM   #66
OldJedi
Use the Force
 
OldJedi's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Corvette Z51, 2018 Porsche GTS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davie, Fl.
Posts: 3,862
Send a message via AIM to OldJedi
Quote:
Originally Posted by obzidian View Post
You cannot base the z28's success on sales alone. It was noted to be a low production unit anyways so what is the point.

The real story is that the z28 is that it time and time again has beaten cars on a race track that are much much faster in a straightline. The car is a track weapon and one that many (still doubt) doubted GM could produce out of a camaro.

The z28's success is the reason there even is a Gt350R. it is the General doing what it does best.... producing a car that rips up the competition, especially cars that cost 2 to 3 times as much.

So no... the z28 is not a failure, it is infact the very reason some auto manufactures arent sleeping well at night.
I completely agree with you and others, the Z28 was a success because GM was able to show that they can take a Camaro and have it compete very well with other major manufacturers, notably Porsche. Although the $75,000 price tag is high for a Camaro there is no other car (non Z06) that runs a track as well within an additional $50,000. Chevy was very honest and clear from the beginning when they said that the Z28 was a dedicated track car that would not be for everyone. Although the Z28 was not for me, the ZL1 was a perfect fit.

As for the the sixth gen. Camaro I found it remarkable that the 2016 SS is faster than the 2015 1LE with its ZL1 parts around the track. This holds a lot of promise for the next 1LE. I certainly believe that there will be ZL1 powered by the LT4 to compete against the GT 500 and the Hellcat. Naturally the SS with the LT1 to compete with the Mustang GT and Challenger. A lightened Z28 track car with a 550HP TT V6 is a compelling thought to compete against the GT-350. I am not sure a non V8 Z28 would make good business sense but it could make for a great track car. I really have no clue what Z28 GM has planned for the GT-350 but I do have total confidence that it will be a great competitor.
__________________
Walk softly, carry a light saber and drive a ZL1!
OldJedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 08:56 PM   #67
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Unless it failed to meet GM's targets, its hard to classify it as a failure. And GMs targets aren't necessarily limited to sales numbers of that model. If it nearly met their sales goal, but drastically exceeded their showroom traffic goal it would still be a success in GMs eyes. A halo car is about selling the entire lineup, not selling itself.

And GM doesn't have to wait until there is something beating the Camaro to greenlight something more. They know that there are people out there who want more than a regular SS, regardless of how good it is. If nothing else, those buyers will want to beat other Camaros.

No. The ZL1 was going to be a Z28 but the Camaro folks realized that it did not fit with what a Z28 should be, so they revived the ZL1 moniker and went to work on a track focused monster.


There isn't really any advantage in using the LF4 for the Z/28. Actually, in many ways its probably worse. Its heavier, the mass is located higher up, won't have the same sort of throttle response as an NA engine, susceptible to heat soak, likely costs substantially more. And for what, gaining 11 hp while losing 11 ft-lbs of torque?

I wouldn't put it past them to be working on something, either a spiritual successor to the gen III LS6 or the gen IV LS7 would make a lot of sense a mid-level engine in Camaros and Corvettes

The engine itself is a few grand more. The brakes are substantially more. The tires are an extra grand for a set themselves. The suspension ... It all adds up. If it isn't worth it to you, thats fine. It doesn't have to be. Thats why there was the SS (plus the 1LE package), the ZL1, and the Z/28 for the 5th gen. Different cars for different buyers.

The problem is that there is only a small market of people who want a super track star Camaro. GM could have watered it down and dropped the price by 30 grand and sold a lot more, but why bother? At that point, you've basically gotten down to a 1LE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
Dropping 2-300 lbs off the SS would put the LT4 Camaro right on top of the Z06 and GM will never let that happen, even if it was possible. Plus, people were bitching about a $75k Z/28. That car would clear 6 figures.

The most likely Z car is an LT4 powered Z/28 around 3950 lbs and set up like the 5th gen ZL1.
Yep it would be close in mass, but it wouldn't clear any more than the current Z/28.

My suggestion would be to simply take the $20,000 premium the Gen5 Z/28 has for the LS7 and put it into the low mass goodies.

And if the Corvette goes to mid-engine as is suspected, there would be no limitations would there? Hmmmmmmm?
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 09:00 PM   #68
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Yep it would be close in mass, but it wouldn't clear any more than the current Z/28.

My suggestion would be to simply take the $20,000 premium the Gen5 Z/28 has for the LS7 and put it into the low mass goodies.

And if the Corvette goes to mid-engine as is suspected, there would be no limitations would there? Hmmmmmmm?
How do you figure? The Z/28 didn't make any chassis changes. The weight was lost elsewhere. I can't imagine them dropping 200 lbs while adding in a heavier engine, heavier drive train, probably more cooling and not have to add some 0s to the MSRP.

IF the Corvette goes mid engine, a massive if, the rumors are that would just be the ZR1 for C7. Unless the C7 gen is very short, there would still be a C7 Z06 running around with a 6th gen Z**. There is no way GM would let an LT4 Camaro run around with a C7 Z06 while they weigh the same.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 09:08 PM   #69
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Yep it would be close in mass, but it wouldn't clear any more than the current Z/28.

My suggestion would be to simply take the $20,000 premium the Gen5 Z/28 has for the LS7 and put it into the low mass goodies.

And if the Corvette goes to mid-engine as is suspected, there would be no limitations would there? Hmmmmmmm?
Interesting idea. Low weight and bump up power of the LT1 with dry sump, CAI, etc..
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 08:22 AM   #70
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
So write this down.

There will be one of two possibilities. 1) GM has something very special in the wings for a Z/28 powertrain. LTx we'll call it. Something that make Ford embarrassed that they created a flat crank hand grenade or 2) GM uses the LT4 at 640/650 HP and looses about 200 to 300 pounds from the SS ANNNNNNNND adds CC brakes and Trofe tires.

This also assumes that GM has an LT4 powered Camaro that is actually standard weight PLUS the weight of the LT4 etc. to compete with the GT500.

So to remove 2 to 300 pounds will be a chore with a lot of what was done to the current Z/28 and what was done to the Malibu (arguably already done to the Camaro) and a crap load of Carbon Fiber and Magnesium and Aluminium.
an LT4 Camaro that weighs 2 or 300 pounds less than a presumably 37XX pound SS would either weigh the same or less than a Z06 I just don't see how that could happen.

I still think it would have to be a hotter LT1 ala LS1 to LS6. That I can see happening.

Corvette couldn't get the numbers they wanted in N/A but maybe they were gunning for something crazy.
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.