Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2021, 09:42 AM   #15
avalonandl

 
avalonandl's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 ZL-1
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Troy, MI & Naples, FL
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Village Idiot View Post
CSP did tests that it's not a restriction until 850-900whp it's not costing anyone a race lol

This..... Thw 2005-2006 GTO's had the same pinch....ZERO loss
__________________
2019 ZL-1 Acquired 4/23/21 at 6300 miles. Riverside Blue, A10, PDR. Traded in 2017 2SS with 6M and 32k miles. Continental Extreme Contact Sports. Now has 10,000 miles...

2012 Yukon XL Denali w/ 6.2 AWD
avalonandl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 09:59 AM   #16
HDRDTD


 
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
It has been demonstrated in the past that even though the tube is 'crushed' a bit, the cross section area remains the same, resulting in 'no' loss of performance.
HDRDTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 11:27 AM   #17
L78toLT1

 
L78toLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: Hyper Blue 2016 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North Ga
Posts: 1,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDRDTD View Post
It has been demonstrated in the past that even though the tube is 'crushed' a bit, the cross section area remains the same, resulting in 'no' loss of performance.
The cross section is reduced a bit, but not enough to affect performance
__________________
Baby Blue
2016 Hyper Blue 2SS/6m/MRC/NPP/Silver Rally stripes/ZL1 wheels & brakes/GForce DS and axles/ZLE Cradle Bushings/FE4 ARB front & rear/SEMA Grill/Rotofab dry/95mm TB/Magnuson 2300/Full LT4 fuel system/JMS boost-a-pump/E85 Sensor/Ported CID heads from LME/Cammotion PD cam/Thompson Motorsports forged shortblock/catted Kooks 1 7/8 headers /JRE remote tuned
L78toLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 11:44 AM   #18
BrianL

 
BrianL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS, Red Hot, NPP, Nav, M6
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Eagle Creek OR
Posts: 783
I got rid of mine as it was just against my grain to have these in place. Just wasn't right in my mind.

I got the Hooker BlackHeart crush pipe delete kit and my cut off wheel and replaced them last year. No difference in performance is all I hear & read, but I would swear there is a bit of a difference in the NPP sound. To me, it was worth it. After all, modding a performance car is about personally getting your hands on it and tweaking, at least for me. I am an engineer and believe in the data shown, but fluid dynamics were on my mind and even though cross section remains the same, the turbulence is not. For the low cost of the kit, I decided to do it.

Measure twice or more before cutting though. The directions provided in the kit were not totally clear.
BrianL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 12:07 PM   #19
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL View Post
No difference in performance is all I hear & read, but I would swear there is a bit of a difference in the NPP sound.
The crimped section has been discussed here endlessly, but it bugs me that, even when you add, say, 50 to 100% more CFM to these high hp engines, that the crimp wouldn't add back pressure.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 12:57 PM   #20
UnknownJinX

 
UnknownJinX's Avatar
 
Drives: 19 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE Shock
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
ANYTHING that affects performance is a HUGE effect since it could potentially cost you a race. That pinch section is an abomination and should be removed imediately before it costs you a race.
If you lose a race and that's your excuse, I'd be shaking my head and thinking you are saltier than Dead Sea, even without knowing that the pinches don't affect the power unless your car is heavily modified.

What's next? Your engine air filter has a leaf on it? Tires have too many rocks on it? Didn't remove your back seats?
__________________
Current:
2019 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE M6 Shock

GM Performance Intake and that's it, because driver mods before car mods

Past:
2009 Mazda RX-8 GT M6 Velocity Red Mica (Sold)
2015 Chevrolet Corvette Z51 2LT M7 Velocity Yellow Tintcoat (Flood totaled)
UnknownJinX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 01:02 PM   #21
L78toLT1

 
L78toLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: Hyper Blue 2016 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North Ga
Posts: 1,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL View Post
I got rid of mine as it was just against my grain to have these in place. Just wasn't right in my mind.

I got the Hooker BlackHeart crush pipe delete kit and my cut off wheel and replaced them last year. No difference in performance is all I hear & read, but I would swear there is a bit of a difference in the NPP sound. To me, it was worth it. After all, modding a performance car is about personally getting your hands on it and tweaking, at least for me. I am an engineer and believe in the data shown, but fluid dynamics were on my mind and even though cross section remains the same, the turbulence is not. For the low cost of the kit, I decided to do it.

Measure twice or more before cutting though. The directions provided in the kit were not totally clear.

Think about it! You’re an engineer! The cross section isn't the same:


The exhaust pipe just before/after the crushed section is 2.75” which works out to a circumference of 8.64” and a cross sectional area of 5.94”. Ignoring any stretching of the pipe resulting from the forming process and discounting the radii at the corners, when considering rectangular sections, a square will give you the max possible cross-sectional area. In our case, we have 8.64 inches to work with, which gets you a 2.16 x 2.16 square with a cross sectional area of 4.67sqin. It gets worse the flatter the rectangle. Ex: a 3.5 x 1.32 rectangle (3.5 + 3.5 + 1.32 + 1.32 = 8.64) nets you a cross section of 4.62sqin. A really flat section of, say 4 x .32 is only 1.28sqin.
__________________
Baby Blue
2016 Hyper Blue 2SS/6m/MRC/NPP/Silver Rally stripes/ZL1 wheels & brakes/GForce DS and axles/ZLE Cradle Bushings/FE4 ARB front & rear/SEMA Grill/Rotofab dry/95mm TB/Magnuson 2300/Full LT4 fuel system/JMS boost-a-pump/E85 Sensor/Ported CID heads from LME/Cammotion PD cam/Thompson Motorsports forged shortblock/catted Kooks 1 7/8 headers /JRE remote tuned
L78toLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 01:37 PM   #22
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,560
Confirming that the crimp has no impact on hp or torque https://www.mishimoto.com/engineerin...he-crimp-myth/
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 02:01 PM   #23
CreeperRS

 
CreeperRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 20’ Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL View Post
I got rid of mine as it was just against my grain to have these in place. Just wasn't right in my mind.

I got the Hooker BlackHeart crush pipe delete kit and my cut off wheel and replaced them last year. No difference in performance is all I hear & read, but I would swear there is a bit of a difference in the NPP sound. To me, it was worth it. After all, modding a performance car is about personally getting your hands on it and tweaking, at least for me. I am an engineer and believe in the data shown, but fluid dynamics were on my mind and even though cross section remains the same, the turbulence is not. For the low cost of the kit, I decided to do it.

Measure twice or more before cutting though. The directions provided in the kit were not totally clear.
If anything gained is an increase in dB on the NPP, I think it’s worth it!
Seems to me it would offer better exhaust flow, I’m not an engineer.
__________________
CreeperRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 02:12 PM   #24
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,428
Drill a couple of small holes (1/4" or so) in the crimped area to compensate for the restriction. Good luck.
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 03:32 PM   #25
3.8TransAM
 
Drives: SS 1LE, 89 TTA, 91 GTA, 91 Formula
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: NW IN
Posts: 600
The farther u move a restriction from the exhaust the less of a restriction it is
3.8TransAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 04:33 PM   #26
Idaho2018GTPremium

 
Idaho2018GTPremium's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,211
Mechanical engineer here...Technically, the crimp adds a tiny bit of back pressure in the exhaust since there is a transition from round to...oval-ish, and back to round, and there is a slight reduction in cross sectional area which means the velocity will increase, and thus, so will the frictional/dynamic losses in that section compared to the rest of the round piping. That said, the crimped pipe segment is so short that it likely has a negligible effect on exhaust performance, and thus little to no effect on engine power.
__________________
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
2022 GR Supra 3.0

Past:
2018 Mustang GT Premium w/ PP1, MR, and A10
2007 MazdaSpeed3
1995 Pontiac Trans Am
1987 Camaro Z28

Idaho2018GTPremium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 05:23 PM   #27
L78toLT1

 
L78toLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: Hyper Blue 2016 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North Ga
Posts: 1,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
Mechanical engineer here...Technically, the crimp adds a tiny bit of back pressure in the exhaust since there is a transition from round to...oval-ish, and back to round, and there is a slight reduction in cross sectional area which means the velocity will increase, and thus, so will the frictional/dynamic losses in that section compared to the rest of the round piping. That said, the crimped pipe segment is so short that it likely has a negligible effect on exhaust performance, and thus little to no effect on engine power.
I'll bet that of all of the mechanical engineers weighing in on this discussion, I'm the only one educated at a school that has played, and beat Saban and Bama! Gig 'em Aggies!!
__________________
Baby Blue
2016 Hyper Blue 2SS/6m/MRC/NPP/Silver Rally stripes/ZL1 wheels & brakes/GForce DS and axles/ZLE Cradle Bushings/FE4 ARB front & rear/SEMA Grill/Rotofab dry/95mm TB/Magnuson 2300/Full LT4 fuel system/JMS boost-a-pump/E85 Sensor/Ported CID heads from LME/Cammotion PD cam/Thompson Motorsports forged shortblock/catted Kooks 1 7/8 headers /JRE remote tuned
L78toLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2021, 05:35 PM   #28
Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by L78toLT1 View Post
Think about it! You’re an engineer! The cross section isn't the same:

The exhaust pipe just before/after the crushed section is 2.75” which works out to a circumference of 8.64” and a cross sectional area of 5.94”. Ignoring any stretching of the pipe resulting from the forming process and discounting the radii at the corners, when considering rectangular sections, a square will give you the max possible cross-sectional area. In our case, we have 8.64 inches to work with, which gets you a 2.16 x 2.16 square with a cross sectional area of 4.67sqin. It gets worse the flatter the rectangle. Ex: a 3.5 x 1.32 rectangle (3.5 + 3.5 + 1.32 + 1.32 = 8.64) nets you a cross section of 4.62sqin. A really flat section of, say 4 x .32 is only 1.28sqin.
I think your 3.5" wide rectangle would only be 0.82" high; a 3" wide rectangle would be 3 x 1.32.

You should probably be thinking a bit deeper than simply outside cross-sectional area (you did consider that inside areas are not based directly on the OD measurement?). But even running with outside 2.75" OD and 8.64" circumference dimensions, a 3 x 1.32 rectangle provides (3 + 3 + 1.32 + 1.32) = 3.96 in^2, or about 85% of the 2.16 x 2.16 square.

I don't blame you for not wading through the round to flat oval math, but I think that the inside area reductions don't happen as rapidly (I think the area loss going from a 2.75" circle down to a 2.2.5" x 3.75" flat oval runs a lot closer to 5%). Feel free to check this.


Beyond that, flow restriction is also a function of how long the restriction is, relative to the unrestricted length. This is at least part of the reason you can get away with dimpling header primary tubes for clearance without losing power until you've really choked the inside area down.


Norm
__________________
'08 GT coupe 5M (the occasional track toy)
'19 WRX 6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
Norm Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.