Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-24-2016, 04:37 PM   #1
Mighunter
 
Drives: 2017 Summit White 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 684
Automakers have created so much new technology

But when it comes to a front licence plate, some resort to just drilling holes in the bumper. Really?
Mighunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2016, 04:39 PM   #2
Whis

 
Drives: 2016 2SS Hyper Blue
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kansas, soon!
Posts: 995
They've borrowed tech in spades, for sure
Whis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2016, 04:43 PM   #3
Mighunter
 
Drives: 2017 Summit White 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 684
its not as if GM just found out that many states require front license plates. Do you think they could spend 20 minutes engineering a nice solution instead of just drilling holes? Jeesh
Mighunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2016, 04:49 PM   #4
HumanWiki


 
Drives: Car
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Place
Posts: 3,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighunter View Post
its not as if GM just found out that many states require front license plates. Do you think they could spend 20 minutes engineering a nice solution instead of just drilling holes? Jeesh
It seems a simple task, until you consider:

They have to engineer cars that will be sold nationwide and now worldwide, with as few locale specific deviations as possible to keep one-off costs down, that also will allow for an aesthetically pleasing configuration in both front plate and non-plate configurations, that will also pass any sort of build/longevity quality tests they have, hold up to any state and/or federal level regulations about such equipment, how that will/won't affect a crash rating (like, it becoming a projectile capable of removing a limb), that won't be so cheap that it will start to fail and face public backlash and recall, but not be so expensive that those that aren't front-plate states won't have to pay an included build price penalty and anything else I can't think of.

The aftermarket people that come up with these solutions aren't always held to the scale and rules that auto mfgs are.

I'd like for the front-plate to be non-drill as well... But, of all the things for GM to focus on when building out a car, I'm fine with them not spending that much time on the front plate mounts and more time on other things that are typically harder to perfect from aftermarket addons.
HumanWiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2016, 05:09 PM   #5
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
California requires a front plate but only enforces it when the cop feels the desire to pull you over. Doesn't enforce it at all on expensive / exotic cars.

Class politics. If you're going to tell nissans and toyota's to have a front plate or else then they should be pulling over the exotics and luxury cars that are never harassed for not having it or taking the law off the books because front plates are stupid and look stupid.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2016, 05:17 PM   #6
Eric SS
#becauseracecar
 
Eric SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
Q: What's cheaper than including nothing to mount a license plate?
A: Nothing

Bottom line is it's good for the bottom line.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.