[MarkSS]

Sounds like the surprise vehicle is a second plug in vehicle to complement the Volt... move along.

[RobC]

Originally Posted by Number 3

The only reason I don't have a CTS V-sport right now instead of the SS is nothing more than the $20,000 price difference.

Sorry, but GM has a lonnngggggg history of putting form over function. The Gen 5 Camaro is the one that is most appropriate for this forum. The old CTS coupe was a joke. The ATS rear seat accommodations are absolutely horrid compared to a 3 Series or A4. I've been in too many of those discussions and watched the styling guys win.

Agreed. I would take a 2015 SS Sedan with a stick over any Cadillac product right now. None of the Caddy performance cars have AWD, the ATS-V did not get a V8, and the CTS-V has lost the manual transmission, not dropped enough weight, and the price creep is ridiculous.

As far as the SS Sedan, I don't like buying a 2008 car ( G8) in 2015, and spending $50k for the SS Sedan which is basically just a Camaro sedan is laughable. If I could buy a SS Sedan with a stick and a Camaro pricetag, there would be one in my driveway right now. If GM wanted to ask $47k for the SS Sedan, they needed to at least make the LS7 or LSA the only engine.

Crossing my fingers that the 2016 Camaro is worth giving up the 4 doors and rear seats that the SS Sedan offers.

[Number 3]

Originally Posted by MarkSS

Sounds like the surprise vehicle is a second plug in vehicle to complement the Volt... move along.

Read it may be the "Bolt". A 200 mile range EV. Hope so cuz that would be a poke in the eye to the big huckster, Elon Musk. We'll see, though.

[Q'smuscle]

Originally Posted by RobC

Agreed. I would take a 2015 SS Sedan with a stick over any Cadillac product right now. None of the Caddy performance cars have AWD, the ATS-V did not get a V8, and the CTS-V has lost the manual transmission, not dropped enough weight, and the price creep is ridiculous.

As far as the SS Sedan, I don't like buying a 2008 car ( G8) in 2015, and spending $50k for the SS Sedan which is basically just a Camaro sedan is laughable. If I could buy a SS Sedan with a stick and a Camaro pricetag, there would be one in my driveway right now. If GM wanted to ask $47k for the SS Sedan, they needed to at least make the LS7 or LSA the only engine.

Crossing my fingers that the 2016 Camaro is worth giving up the 4 doors and rear seats that the SS Sedan offers.

Well , if you optioned out a Camaro it would be the price of the boring Chevy SS ! Or the 2ss 1LE package too! I would still have to pick the ATS-V over the Chevy SS just for looks alone!

[MikeT]

Leave it to GM to go 'all in' with plug-in vehicles... just at a time when gasoline prices are plummeting.

What about the gasoline-powered Camaros, trucks and SUVs that Americans actually want to buy? How 'bout giving them their proper due?

If Monday is all about Volts and Bolts, then we'll know who's running GM... Dolts.

[FenwickHockey65]

Originally Posted by MikeT

Leave it to GM to go 'all in' with plug-in vehicles... just at a time when gasoline prices are plummeting.

What about the gasoline-powered Camaros, trucks and SUVs that Americans actually want to buy? How 'bout giving them their proper due?

If Monday is all about Volts and Bolts, then we'll know who's running GM... Dolts.

Those plug in vehicles are what's off setting the CAFE numbers for gasoline powered Camaros, trucks and SUVs. And I hope you're not foolish enough to think these gas prices are permanent.

Seriously the way you guys act you'd think GM had canned the Camaro. There's still two other major shows to go. And considering how production won't start until later this year, the longer they wait to unveil the car, the less time Ford and FCA has to react.

Just be patient.

[ssrs2lt]

Hahaha good one.. There's been more than one dolt running gm

[mr02Z/28]

!!!!!!!!!!! ............ I can't be patient !!!!!!!!!!!! I want to dump my '13 2LT for a 2016 SS or hopefully a 2.0L turbo 4 Camaro !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Overflow]

From prior experience, I can tell you that GM is not very good at keeping secrets. So I'm not too sure it's a Camaro.. But I could be wrong.

[Q'smuscle]

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

Those plug in vehicles are what's off setting the CAFE numbers for gasoline powered Camaros, trucks and SUVs. And I hope you're not foolish enough to think these gas prices are permanent.

Seriously the way you guys act you'd think GM had canned the Camaro. There's still two other major shows to go. And considering how production won't start until later this year, the longer they wait to unveil the car, the less time Ford and FCA has to react.

Just be patient.

I just thought about it after reading what you said about the gas ! These ppl are really smarter than we thought or some of us anyways! Low gas prices so they can sell more cars and than just go back to 5 dollars! Lol...

[Q'smuscle]

Originally Posted by mr02Z/28

!!!!!!!!!!! ............ I can't be patient !!!!!!!!!!!! I want to dump my '13 2LT for a 2016 SS or hopefully a 2.0L turbo 4 Camaro !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And GM please hurry up and give this person a turbo 4 Camaro ! Lol...

[Posaune]

Originally Posted by Q'smuscle

And GM please hurry up and give this person a turbo 4 Camaro ! Lol...

LMAO.

I still loathe the idea of a 4 cyl camaro.

I think the surprise will be other versions of the Volt (a 5 passenger CUV with Volt drivetrain would be a hit) besides the rumored Bolt. GM has been holding onto the Crossvolt trademark for a little while now.

Maybe a mid engine car concept to compliment the Corvette Stingray. Still could be the 6th Gen since this is GM home turf autoshow.

[hairtrigger]

It's the Chev Bolt

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/bus...ange/21535887/

[Posaune]

Originally Posted by hairtrigger

It's the Chev Bolt

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/bus...ange/21535887/

I still have a feeling we are going to see something beyond the Bolt.