Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > Z/28 Discussions


Bigwormgraphix


View Poll Results: What do you think will power the Z/28? (
Small (5 - 5.5L range) high revving engine 26 8.10%
LT1 with minor power bump (CAI, exhaust, etc) 10 3.12%
Heavily reworked LT1, similar to the LS6 from the C5 Z06; ~500 hp 65 20.25%
Large displacement sucessor to the LS7, ~550 hp 129 40.19%
LT4, same as from the ZL1, CTS-v, and Z06 50 15.58%
'super LT4' with a bigger blower or turbos making 700+ 31 9.66%
Other (please specify) 10 3.12%
Voters: 321. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-20-2016, 07:55 PM   #15
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
For those that will buy one, the namesake of the car and to never read Bhobb's say Camaro is limited by Corvette again ..... I'm hoping for

"A new large displacement NA engine, serving as the successor to the LS7. Likely to put out something in the mid 500s".
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 08:22 PM   #16
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotlap View Post
For those that will buy one, the namesake of the car and to never read Bhobb's say Camaro is limited by Corvette again ..... I'm hoping for

"A new large displacement NA engine, serving as the successor to the LS7. Likely to put out something in the mid 500s".
I fully accept the possibility that I am wrong. I hope I am. A new 7.0 making 550+ hp would be awesome.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 08:37 PM   #17
Egon

 
Egon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS 1LE
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 977
I really think if Ford hadn't come out with the Voodoo FPC engine especially for the GT350 the Z/28 would have been more likely to get the LT4. But because the Voodoo was so unexpected and has been praised so much by reviewers I think Chevy knows they have to step it up and do something different for the Z/28. Ford raised the bar and I think people will be really disappointed if there isn't something special in the works for the Z/28 engine.
__________________
Egon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 10:39 PM   #18
Tractionless
 
Drives: '03 Silverado
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Edinburg, Texas
Posts: 52
Z/28 exclusive, all aluminum, DOHC, 32V, 427ci, V8 in the neighborhood of 600hp. Voodoo whoo?
Tractionless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 07:13 AM   #19
oakaro68
 
oakaro68's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 410
How does everyone feel about the idea of overhead cams? I know they experimented with that on the 90's ZR1, but moving away from the cherished old school pushrod design might indicate the beginning of the end of the pushrod for GM performance
oakaro68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 09:16 AM   #20
233
 
Drives: I have a bike.
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: IN
Posts: 87
8 liter v10 hahahahahaha
233 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 11:38 AM   #21
DenverTaco07


 
DenverTaco07's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
all good posts...


my guess is LT4 but on the other hand GM seems willing and capable of blowing our minds so who freakin knows.
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
DenverTaco07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 11:53 AM   #22
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,426
Sticking with LT4 prediction....The game is for the fastest track weapon....That's heritage enough for the Z/28....FI's time has come. It's still Chevy/GM.

A brand new, very low volume, super-car unique engine still isn't in their mind-set. Maybe there is something in the skunk-works for a future mid-engine Corvette in a few more years. I think it's just too soon for the Z/28 if it comes out in the 50th anniversary year, which it should.

A slightly bumped up LT1 for the Z/28? I don't think so. That should be saved for a 1LE or re-fresh SS upgrade. A very high hp N/A v-8? They tried that road and had to turn around. I don't think they will build an in-betweener engine that can't keep up with the ZL-1 just to say that it's N/A.

The volume of Z/28 units just isn't/won't be there to justify a unique engine. We'll see, though!...Happy guessing!

Last edited by 90503; 05-21-2016 at 12:45 PM.
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 12:13 PM   #23
IOMike

 
Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tractionless View Post
Z/28 exclusive, all aluminum, DOHC, 32V, 427ci, V8 in the neighborhood of 600hp. Voodoo whoo?
I like this...probably 560hp though, 427 or 396.
IOMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 05:29 PM   #24
mkorgan

 
Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tractionless View Post
Z/28 exclusive, all aluminum, DOHC, 32V, 427ci, V8 in the neighborhood of 600hp. Voodoo whoo?
We could only hope for something this special.
mkorgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 06:04 PM   #25
Posaune
 
Drives: Four wheels and an engine
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Garage
Posts: 363
If it truly is N/A, I can think of four possible displacements, three of which are based on current production offerings:
1) 6.2 LT1 based - hotter cam and allowed to rev more
2) 5.3 L83 based - would have to be allowed to rev very high (same 96MM Bore and 92MM stroke as the L83
3) 5.7 using the 99.6MM bore and 92MM stroke for the GenV based LV3 4.3L V6.
4) 7.0 Same 104.8MM Bore and 101.6MM stroke as the LS7. This is the only bore/stroke combo that isn't currently in production

Could the smaller displacement options be configure to allow the RPMs above 7000?
Posaune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 06:05 PM   #26
Posaune
 
Drives: Four wheels and an engine
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Garage
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by oakaro68 View Post
How does everyone feel about the idea of overhead cams? I know they experimented with that on the 90's ZR1, but moving away from the cherished old school pushrod design might indicate the beginning of the end of the pushrod for GM performance
I would much rather them stay with Cam-in-block, OHV configuration.
Posaune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 06:14 PM   #27
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
A 5.3 liter isn't going to make 500 hp. The 5.2 voodoo is DOHC and has to spin to 7500 to make that much power.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 07:17 PM   #28
Posaune
 
Drives: Four wheels and an engine
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Garage
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
A 5.3 liter isn't going to make 500 hp. The 5.2 voodoo is DOHC and has to spin to 7500 to make that much power.
No, probably not, at least not while making emissions.

Just laying out the possibilities. Like the 5.7L isn't in production in V8 form but the bore and stroke are in the LV3 V6.

My guess is either a 6.2 or 7.0 with AFM removed to increase RPM.
Posaune is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.