Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2013, 10:12 PM   #1
Renegade
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro SS Edition
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 6,840
Send a message via AIM to Renegade Send a message via MSN to Renegade Send a message via Yahoo to Renegade Send a message via Skype™ to Renegade
2014 Jaguar F-Type Lookin' Better Then The Refresh Camaro


The last time Jaguar shipped a British sports car to America, its customers could sing along with Terry Jacks' "Seasons of the Sun" over the sonorous hiss of the in-dash eight track. That the E-Type had been dubbed "the most beautiful car ever made" by Enzo Ferrari was old news at that point; marred by smog and bumper rules, combined with a rising sense among owners that maybe British cars weren't of the best quality,
Jaguar shuffled the E-Type out of production in 1974.

Nearly four decades later – after spells in government-sponsored torpor, Thatcher-era privatization, ill-suited servitude under Ford and finally a period of grace this century thanks to the ownership of an Indian industrial magnate — Jaguar returns to the sports-car business with the 2014 F-Type. And as epic as the E-Type remains, the successor leaves the shadow of its forebear with a quickness.

Jaguar itself ranks as a bantamweight among European luxury car builders, and to justify the F-Type's existence the car has to address a bevy of competitors. Base models with the 3-liter supercharged V-6 tuned to 340 hp start at $69,895, sparring with the BMW Z4 and Porsche Boxster. There's a mid-level F-Type S with 380 hp from the V-6 and other performance changes that leaps in price to $81,895. And the top of the range sits the $92,895 F-Type V-8, with 495 hp from the 5-liter supercharged unit under the one-piece bonnet and an assignment from headquarters to dogfight the Porsche 911 and Audi R8 — names I thought I'd misheard in my jet-lagged stupor.

While the pressure to create a retrofutuistic E-Type ran strong within Jaguar, designer Ian Callum and team rightly resisted, crafting a modern car that's more aggressive and angular. For our drive of the F-Type around Pamplona, Spain, Jaguar brought not just a pristine E-Type but two of its racing predecessors, the C-Type and D-Type, and sitting amongst them, the F-Type looked like a bodybuilder who had taken a wrong turn into a jockeys' convention. Even with an all-aluminum frame, the F-Type sports 500 lbs. on the last-generation E-Type.




On the roads of Spain, under the watchful eyes of the guarda civil trafico, the F-Type proved eager enough, and that despite decades of building soft-riding sedans Jaguar engineers could tune a firm chassis. Unlike other modern Jaguars, the F-Type's interior tends to European austerity rather than wood and flash, with the bit of whimsy provided by vents that rise from the center of the dash. We could only sample roadster versions, but none showed signs of cowl shake or other lack of rigidity; if anything, the typical Jaguar owner will find it too tight over less-than-perfect roads. All that stiffness, and the stylish lack of overhangs beyond the wheels does come with a price — namely little space beyond the optional performance seats smartly borrowed from the XJR-S. The trunk's rated volume comes in at 7 cubic feet, part of which has been sculpted in service of the motorized top and suspension, leaving the unofficial estimation at "buy your groceries after you drop the bags at the beach house."

The first day of driving the Eaton-supercharged V-6s around the Navarra mountains revealed them willing to hustle. Unlike nearly all new cars, Jaguar stuck with hydraulic steering rather than the electronic units that are often to driving what Casio is to symphony orchestras, letting the driver feel more of the road as it happens. The 8-speed ZF automatic handles manual shifting via paddles without complaint, although it did keep the base V-6 stirred several hundred revs higher than expected. (One pre-production V-6 on our drive performed its own historical homage to the E-Type and self-destructed.) The F-Type has no racing heritage, yet the 380-hp S version — with its larger 19-inch wheels, bigger brakes and a limited-slip differential among other upgrades — hustled the F1-level track with sufficient verve to suggest a second career in weekend motorsports.

And yet, in the sleepless hours after the first day, that mention of the Porsche 911 echoed. It's one thing to be as enthusiastic as Jaguar brand chief Adrian Hallmark, who's fond of saying that "Jaguar without a sports car is as incomplete as Ferrari without a sports car." The V-6 F-Type makes for a more sober alternative to the Z4 and other toy roadsters — but the 911 ranks as the most balanced sports car on the road today. Even at a 25 percent discount to the Porsche's sticker price, ranking the F-Type as its peer came off as the blather of businessmen.


Then came the drive of the V-8, and I learned the literal translation of "me gusta."

Over roads with more curves than Christina Hendricks at the Guggenheim, the F-Type never felt less than composed and confident. The V-8 brings along an electric limited-slip differential, even larger brakes, 20-inch wheels with Pirelli P-Zero rubber and software that lets the hardware rock. Try as I might, I couldn't upset the F-Type — if I understeered into a corner, the accelerator brought the tail around promptly; if I was oversteering, the brakes took the assignment without drama, over and over again, and if I needed the Heimlich maneuver, the V-8 could punch me in the gut. At 4.2 seconds to 60 mph, the Jaguar F-Type runs bumper-to-bumper with the Porsche 911 S Cabriolet models in a straight line; I suspect practiced hands could wheel a faster track time out of Stuttgart's champion, but to anyone who doesn't own a racing helmet, the differences will be matters of taste rather than statistics.

Here's where I should remind you that even ten years into this second millennium Jaguar trails the reliability rankings and resale value of its German peers, and where common sense says I should suggest that the V-6 will be more than enough car for anyone who can spring for it. But life's obligations melt away when you have a Jaguar F-Type in the sunshine with its top folded, calling you to have some joy, have some fun.

2014 JAGUAR F-TYPE SPECIFICATIONS
CLASSTwo-door, two-seat roadster/coupeENGINES3.0-liter supercharged V-6 in normal and S-level; 5-liter supercharged V-8TRANSMISSION8-speed automaticPOWER340 hp base; 380 hp (S); 495 hp (V-8)TORQUE332 ft.-lbs. base; 339 (S); 460 (V-8)MILEAGE20 mpg city/28 mpg highway; 19/27 (S); 16/23 (V-8)EMISSIONS6.4 tons CO2/year (V6)PRICE RANGE
$69,895 — $92,895PROSA true sports roadster with modern Jaguar stylingCONSPack light — and save up for the V-8
Renegade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 10:27 PM   #2
AZCamaroFan
Camaro6 2016-2018
 
AZCamaroFan's Avatar
 
Drives: sometimes
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18,450
i saw it some time ago. personally , it looks nice, but a bit generic, especially at the rear.
__________________
AZCamaroFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 10:29 PM   #3
rsflyer
 
rsflyer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 VR 2LT/RS A6
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 163
Arrow You are...

...comparing apples to oranges... Two very different cars.

That does look nice however.
__________________
Its not how fast you go, but how you go.
rsflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 10:30 PM   #4
Renegade
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro SS Edition
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 6,840
Send a message via AIM to Renegade Send a message via MSN to Renegade Send a message via Yahoo to Renegade Send a message via Skype™ to Renegade
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZCamaroFan View Post
i saw it some time ago. personally , it looks nice, but a bit generic, especially at the rear.
Can't be worse then the new SS rear.
Renegade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 10:33 PM   #5
AZCamaroFan
Camaro6 2016-2018
 
AZCamaroFan's Avatar
 
Drives: sometimes
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18,450
it's not that bad, maybe too plain , i don't know.
the Stingray....that's a different story
__________________
AZCamaroFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 10:40 PM   #6
Renegade
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro SS Edition
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 6,840
Send a message via AIM to Renegade Send a message via MSN to Renegade Send a message via Yahoo to Renegade Send a message via Skype™ to Renegade
Yeah it's not that bad. How you feel about the Stingray?
Renegade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 10:58 PM   #7
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Meh, not the exciting to look at.
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:01 PM   #8
alex70olds
~~*~~
 
alex70olds's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 #141
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lake Conroe Texas
Posts: 911
It may look OK, but have they exercised the electrical demons? Dont miss my Jag at all.
__________________
alex70olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:16 PM   #9
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
It is only worth owning if/when it comes as a coupe.
__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:21 PM   #10
trewyn15


 
trewyn15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 Monte Carlo LS
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,414
Well the new Camaro looks awful, so not saying much lol
__________________
2004 Monte Carlo LS - 1966 AMC Rambler Rebel Classic - 2000 Trans Am WS6
trewyn15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:22 PM   #11
Renegade
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro SS Edition
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 6,840
Send a message via AIM to Renegade Send a message via MSN to Renegade Send a message via Yahoo to Renegade Send a message via Skype™ to Renegade
Quote:
Originally Posted by trewyn15 View Post
Well the new Camaro looks awful, so not saying much lol
let's not be reminded of a design glitch.
Renegade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:24 PM   #12
trewyn15


 
trewyn15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 Monte Carlo LS
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,414
haha i'll leave it at that
__________________
2004 Monte Carlo LS - 1966 AMC Rambler Rebel Classic - 2000 Trans Am WS6
trewyn15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:29 PM   #13
Renegade
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro SS Edition
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 6,840
Send a message via AIM to Renegade Send a message via MSN to Renegade Send a message via Yahoo to Renegade Send a message via Skype™ to Renegade
I wonder who on this forum will be the first to buy the new refreshed SS.
Renegade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:31 PM   #14
alex70olds
~~*~~
 
alex70olds's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 #141
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lake Conroe Texas
Posts: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
I wonder who on this forum will be the first to buy the new refreshed SS.
Time for a poll? lol
__________________
alex70olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.