03-27-2014, 07:07 PM | #1079 | |
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Someone sure likes to dish it out but can't take it. |
|
03-27-2014, 09:58 PM | #1080 |
Drives: 2010 2SS RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St Louis mo.
Posts: 270
|
What have I dished out? That I prefer V6 and V8 to four cylinder?!
Eff you dude.
__________________
2SS RS bone stock for now...
|
03-27-2014, 10:12 PM | #1081 |
Drives: 2013 Fiat 500 Abarth Grigio Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manassas, Va
Posts: 3,124
|
So why do care so much that chevy offers another option for people who want a turbo 4 over a V6 I disliked my V6 Camaro I couldn't wait to get out of it since it was missing that down low off the line grunt which a V8 and turbo 4 have well not all but most do have the low end grunt in the lower rev range. It would be stupid for Chevy to just say to people who want a turbo 4 tough luck go by a mustang is basically what would be like if they didn't atleast entertain the idea of it.
|
03-27-2014, 10:44 PM | #1082 |
Account Suspended
|
|
03-28-2014, 12:18 AM | #1083 |
Drives: 2010 2SS RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St Louis mo.
Posts: 270
|
You are clearly 7 years old. As for the rest, you guys can buy what you want with your money, I'll buy what I want with mine.
If I don't like what's offered I won't buy it. I may not choose to buy GM if the car starts to suck. If that's "dishing out something" so be it. I'm about done with Camaro 5 anyway.
__________________
2SS RS bone stock for now...
|
03-28-2014, 12:52 AM | #1084 |
Drives: '15 SS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North County
Posts: 1,235
|
This is what some of us have been saying. If you don't like a turbo 4 banger, don't buy it. Save up your miles on your SS if you want to keep it forever.
__________________
Follow My Car on INSTAGRAMhttp://www.instagram.com/forb1dd3n_ss
|
03-28-2014, 07:55 AM | #1085 |
Drives: 1998 Nissan, 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 827
|
|
03-28-2014, 12:55 PM | #1086 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS-M6 67 Chevelle Wgn Join Date: May 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,509
|
This was the original post by the OP over a year ago. It was then a simple question and now a lot of you have managed to turn a simple question into personal attacks because someone disagrees with your opinion. I`ve followed this thread to see how long it would take before some of you would resort to making the question personal in either being for or against a 4 cyl Camaro. And as usual it didn`t take long. A lot of you claim to be "Car guys" but after reading some of the responses to other "Car guys" thoughts on the subject I`ve come to the conclusion that you are neither, you are.....well.....just people who either can not or will not accept another's opinion that dosen`t match your own. So sad to watch what should be an intelligent discussion turn into this!!! (A piss fight)
|
03-28-2014, 02:18 PM | #1087 |
Drives: 2002 Z/28,1968 Chevelle convert. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phila.,PA
Posts: 1,141
|
Like I stated before, I would love a Oddball 4 banger pushing 320hp/300tq in a 3,300lb 6th Gen .... Options are always fun .....
Maybe folks are afraid a 4 banger will put the scare on a V-6 or a V-8 .... |
03-28-2014, 03:18 PM | #1088 |
Drives: new ss Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: new jersey
Posts: 242
|
because its better than a 3 cylinder? lol
|
03-28-2014, 08:35 PM | #1089 |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
|
03-28-2014, 08:41 PM | #1090 | |
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
|
Quote:
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
03-28-2014, 08:49 PM | #1091 | |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Quote:
...and BTW, the Iron Duke died about 2 decades ago, and it isn't coming back. You'll be hurt to know there are actually folks who miss that engine (in applications OTHER than Camaro!). It was an anvil of an engine, but you're safe. You can come out now...it's gone... And NO, the arguments are very much DIFFERENT from an engineering standpoint. Power-to-Weight matters (as it always should have), and modern 4-cylinder engines deliver GREAT power, GREAT economy and GREAT performance, when engineered thoroughly into selected vehicles. Question (that should be of REAL concern to you): What's the price differential for BMW, Mercedes and Audi, when going from a 4-cylinder version of their cars to their V8s? From their 6s to their V8s? And, finally, from their 4s to their 6s? Smart folks, those Germans, nein? Profitable, too... |
|
03-28-2014, 09:00 PM | #1092 | |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Quote:
...and you complained THEN about 30 some odd pages...and we're now on Page 44... Pot...Kettle...BLACK... |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|