10-25-2015, 12:46 PM | #1 |
Lethal Camaro
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
|
2016 Camaro SS Automatic Dyno but no numbers....
So it looks like Dennis P. found a road to a dyno during his time with a 16 Camaro SS. Overall was cool to see the image at the link below, but he hasn't posted the results.
The concerning issue is that he claims he did not see the same results as the Hot Rod Dyno run, but it was close. Now looking at their show, it looks like the do a ton of different tests on cars and this makes me wonder if they tested with NPP on and off. I am sure GM saw his post, but are they stopping him from posting details? Not sure it actually matters as the results are in on how the manual and auto perform off the dyno and it is spectacular regardless. https://instagram.com/p/9Fyg-PlFc9/
__________________
|
10-25-2015, 01:18 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro convertible 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,077
|
If it was a auto, there may be more driveline loss, thus smaller number. IMHO
|
10-25-2015, 01:34 PM | #3 |
Drives: 16 Camaro Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: 805
Posts: 282
|
Only variable that's different from the 2 dynos? So maybe....
__________________
|
10-25-2015, 03:53 PM | #4 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
The autos will dyno lower then the manuals if all variables are the same. I would expect numbers in the 390 range.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|