12-11-2017, 12:10 PM | #15 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
The 1.9s and some ported heads. Some nice lighter weight aftermarket springs and retainers. Would still sound and look stock. Bet it would run pretty strong and hurt some feels
I really don’t feel like doing a cam lol Anyone know a price ? |
12-11-2017, 12:15 PM | #16 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 CAMARO SS/ gpi built Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cabot ar
Posts: 374
|
just called them... 3520.00 shipped
|
12-11-2017, 12:45 PM | #17 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
|
12-11-2017, 03:22 PM | #18 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 CAMARO SS/ gpi built Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cabot ar
Posts: 374
|
CRAZY MONEY
|
12-11-2017, 05:03 PM | #19 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,799
|
yea and they would get the lift up close to .600 using the stock cam and make better use of those ported stock castings. I bet the gains would be even higher. Too bad they are so freaking expensive. Maybe SLP will drop a higher ratio stock style rocker like the did for the LS stuff.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
12-11-2017, 06:07 PM | #20 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
LOL. That is ridiculous. You could build a 416 short block for that price. Hmmm, decisions decisions. I think not.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
12-11-2017, 06:13 PM | #21 |
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85 Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
|
Thanks for the info, I was thinking the LS3 head was the best flowing around, but the LT1 head does flow more at higher lift. For some reason I am thinking the cam specs are the same, so I guess the increased power comes from the compression ratio?
|
12-11-2017, 07:09 PM | #22 | |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
The LS3 cam is 204/211 ICL is 120 and ECL is 115. I can't remember off the top of my head how that actually works out. The LT1 cam is 200/207 116.5+7 The LT1 has almost a point more compression, DI, VVT, better heads from the factory with a manifold designed for tq and velocity. By better heads I mean 12* valve angle and splayed, reverse swirl pattern and a much more Oval/Square runner than the LS3. Remember, the best thing we could do with a head is make it a round tube that was straight. Everything from there is a compromise that looses efficiency. The best head so far has been the LS7. Mine flow into the 390's on my bench by .625" lift with a 272cc runner. The 2.20" valve doesn't hurt but it isn't the only reason the LS7 head is still king in my mind. Now, a LT1 head with a 2.20" valve on a 4.125" bore could be deadly. Hmmmmm, wonder how much it would be to put new seats in this head. The LS7 valves should be the same length.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
Last edited by PRAY; 12-11-2017 at 07:30 PM. |
|
12-11-2017, 07:50 PM | #23 | ||
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
Id still probably do a cam someday but it would be a nice next step for me... Quote:
I know dynos vary but it seems like the average head/cam build the lt1 has about 50 hp on the ls3 from what ive seen. I know they have been in the 550 rwhp range as well but im just talking about on average the lt1 seems to make a lot better power with the average NA build. |
||
12-12-2017, 06:39 AM | #24 | |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|