08-13-2014, 09:16 PM | #113 |
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
|
Charger with the Red Interior had red door inserts
|
08-13-2014, 09:18 PM | #114 |
Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,850
|
|
08-13-2014, 09:19 PM | #115 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
|
08-13-2014, 09:24 PM | #116 |
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
|
You are right the Charger does not have the colour options that the Challenger had until now, 2015 have a much nicer interior now I did like the dash pre 2014 but the 2014 plus dash has grown on me and I'm now a convert.
Last edited by rocket403; 08-13-2014 at 09:40 PM. |
08-13-2014, 09:34 PM | #117 |
36.58625, -121.7568
|
While the corvette interior isn't perfect, yes I do. By a mile.
|
08-13-2014, 09:46 PM | #118 |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
on appearances alone I much prefer the Corvette interior over the new Mopar twins.
|
08-13-2014, 09:48 PM | #119 |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
|
08-13-2014, 09:50 PM | #120 | |
Pull up Cougar!
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
The Camaro interior has a great design but the materials suck. These new Dodge interiors look like they may not be 90% hard plastic like ours. I'll have to see in person. |
|
08-13-2014, 09:55 PM | #121 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 1,359
|
I think my Camaro interior is nice, but I also love the interior on my '14 Durango R/T. With red stitching...
__________________
|
08-13-2014, 11:03 PM | #122 | ||
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
Quote:
Quote:
Agree and ima check the Durango interior, as I forgot how it looks! But the Durango is sweet on the outside! I can't believe how good it looks! Just like I couldn't believe how good the 10-13's looked! It's the only sub that I put with the 06-14 Tahoe . As I don't like GM's new SUV's exterior! |
||
08-13-2014, 11:07 PM | #123 |
Drives: 2010 ZR1 "Satan" Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Norco, CA
Posts: 1,183
|
Great. Just what we need. 200mph cop cars.
2015 will be interesting. 2016 will be nuts. BTW - most the euro sedans are speed limited. And I drove a 4 door 3/4 ton 4x4 pickup (7100lb, aero of a barn) past 200mph in 11,000' DA on salt. 197.xx with the engine off, and chute deployed. Speed is relative. And an important sidebar, even with a full funny suit, extra strong rollcage, fire systems, a simple accident at 200 is nearly always fatal. The guy in front of me broke something a 200, and rolled. I did not see the crash, but I stayed suited up for 90 minutes before I could run. Very hot in a SFI 20. Only afterwards did I learn he was killed. 2009? I'm certainly not against going fast. But Dodge should be very careful with spamming the media about a 200mph 4500lb car that can be purchased by rookies. Europe already figured it out. A 747 weighs up to a million pounds on takeoff, and it only takes 160mph to go airborne.
__________________
2002 Z06 "Blue Meanie" 11.36 ET
2003 Z06 in progress 2009 CTS-V "Spooky" 12.36 ET, bone stock at 1600 mi. Rainy day in Sacramento. Sadness. 2010 ZR1 "Satan" no times yet. 2013 Volt SCCA Solo2 #771 HS3. And a bunch of Duramaxes. |
08-13-2014, 11:32 PM | #124 |
Drives: car Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 305
|
Many Euros are limited to 155 but not all.
The fastest BMW is the M5 at 189 Mercedes SLS Black hits 196 and the SLS Mclaren can do 206. Fastest Audi R8 202 Ferrari 458 199 Ferrari 599 205 Lamb Gallardo 202 Granted. 99.999999% of US drivers will never see a 200mph run. 99% will never do more than 150. Its bragging rights and posturing, but it sure is working great for advertising. |
08-13-2014, 11:34 PM | #125 | |
Drives: 2010 ZR1 "Satan" Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Norco, CA
Posts: 1,183
|
Another track I race at El Mirage, which is a dirt dry lake.
Notice the NASCAR style cage in the Honda Insight (one of the most aerodynamic cars ever built) when a problem occurs at about 185mph: Gust of wind? Part broke? Who knows. 200mph does serious damage even on flat ground. Asphalt would have most likely been worse. You glue a 200mph sticker on a car and boast loud enough, and some wingnut is going to find out that a ton of force on the nose of a car can do incredible things.
__________________
2002 Z06 "Blue Meanie" 11.36 ET
2003 Z06 in progress 2009 CTS-V "Spooky" 12.36 ET, bone stock at 1600 mi. Rainy day in Sacramento. Sadness. 2010 ZR1 "Satan" no times yet. 2013 Volt SCCA Solo2 #771 HS3. And a bunch of Duramaxes. |
|
08-14-2014, 03:20 AM | #126 |
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2011 Buick Regal Turbo Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,392
|
They won't. Not to this.
The Chevy SS competes with the 470hp (going on 485hp for 2015) Charger SRT. The Cadillac CTS-V will be made for going against BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG, Audi RS6/RS7, Jaguar XFR/XFR-S, Porsche Panamera Turbo S. Of course the CTS-V and Hellcat Charger will most likely be tested against each other because of their similarities (both have a 6.2L supercharged V8, both have 8 Speed Automatics, both are RWD, etc.) but in the end this is not GM's intended answer for the Hellcat Charger. As far as Ford...Ford has nothing at all! Unless there is going to be a bad ass next gen Ford Taurus, all is quiet on this front. Lo and behold, the Hellcat Charger sits alone in its own unique space, power and price-wise.
__________________
Last edited by King T; 08-14-2014 at 03:40 AM. |
Post Reply
|
|
|