![]() |
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2023 SGM Camaro 2SS 1LE 6M Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 575
|
A lot of complaints seem to revolve around visibility and interior space. These are things that the Mustang and Challenger don't seem to suffer as much from.
As we know the Alpha based 6th Gen is a great performing car but it's style and design seem to limit it's appeal in the marketplace. I can appreciate GM Design listening to the disciples and enthusiasts to keep the 6th Gen true to the 5th Gen from a styling perspective with Alpha based advancements. But they should've put more emphasis on Camaro being a great car from an ergonomic and livability perspective first, with great performance potential optional. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Dumb Ass Deluxe
Drives: A Tricked Out Mountain Bike Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,959
|
The 4th gen looked like a Geo Storm.
![]() It's only saving grace was the 2G-LTx and the LSx under the hood. https://file.kelleybluebookimages.co...downsize=391:* https://file.kbb.com/kbb/vehicleimag...downsize=360:*
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
![]() Drives: 2020 LT1 Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
I barely fit in my jeep with the doors on and its an overpriced tin box. Doesnt matter... Looks matter. Style? I was just thinking of the last gen viper. It was one of the greatest cars of all time.... But that face! what a blah boring ergonomic and livable face... Thats why viper died. thats why camaro died. Looks. not ergonomics. not visibility, not how many tampons fit in the trunk. Looks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|