[fradaj]

Originally Posted by Camaro_Corvette

Nice. So it lost 3+ inches. Still can't pass a bucket of chicken through that side window, but that's okay.

Here's your 2010.

186" Overall length is the same as a 1969 Camaro.

[digdeep0169]

you can't tell anything... this is probably a wrapped Honda Accord with Cam wheels... too discrete to tell

[el ess A]

Originally Posted by 102SS

Every Camaro has been better and faster than the previous generation.

I guess you've never owned an 82 or you would rethink that.

I don't care HOW big it is. The point is...if it fits in your garage, then this is the Camaro for you!

[94turbolsx]

Originally Posted by hotlapZL1

They are trying to fake a G5 shape. My first thought was are they (can they) fake the side windows? If not, it's the concept profile shown in photos on page 9.

I thought the same thing as well. It would be incredibly easy for them to do that. The GM guys read this stuff. Im sure theyre having a good laugh reading all the comments about it.

[snizzle]

Originally Posted by Overflow

The headlight/taillight thing is a joke. When people were seeing the 5th gen miles running around, they had some weird headlights installed instead of the halos and everyone was making a big deal about the headlights.

Wait, what now?

[DenverTaco07]

HOLY CRAP!!! did you see those windshield wipers! If that is what is going on the real Gen 6, count me in!!!

[2SS 2011]

it looks like a regular camaro with corvette rims on it

[Eich]

Originally Posted by Danimal

Smaller platform? Its going to lose its muscle car nostalgia...

Was the 1967 Camaro a muscle car? I'd say it was a bit smaller than today's car.

[blahzay]

man I truly hope this isn't the 6th Gen. This thing looks TINY! Ughhhhhh! I have been patiently waiting and although you can tell much with these pics, you can see the size difference. I mean if you were going to squeeze the 6th gen into a cruze frame then freakin just eliminate the back seats because they now are there for show unless the driver and passenger are 4'10! Ill wait until I pass judgement for sure but if its as small as i think it is then I'm out of the 6th Gen sweepstakes.


* If this is the size then I hope the release a 2016 Camaro SS/RS XL and I might reconsider :-/ *

[Q'smuscle]

Hey, what if this is it because as you all have pointed out and can see that it does have the split hood vents! The ones on these spy shots are bigger but hey, smoke screen right? Look ppl also pointed out Fastback or hatch back kinda look too! Plus a evolution not a revolution and still have everything else like the 5th Gen. Oh , wait dang, I just notice that huge maybe spoiler piece like this 3rd Gen rendering. Man this will be awesome, if it is!

[OUTATIME]

If the wheels are any indication, there could be some truth to the Car and Driver prediction from a while back. The wheels look exactly the same, and you can see a little of the fender bumps under the camo, also depicted in the C&D image. Full article here: http://www.caranddriver.com/features...17-future-cars

[c5Legend]

I would be mad if it was smaller, I like my muscle cars roomy inside.. its for the big boys.. lil sports/tuner cars for the little guys.

[Q'smuscle]

Originally Posted by OUTATIME

If the wheels are any indication, there could be some truth to the Car and Driver prediction from a while back. The wheels look exactly the same, and you can see a little of the fender bumps under the camo, also depicted in the C&D image. Full article here: http://www.caranddriver.com/features...17-future-cars

I don't know. I see more from the 3rd Gen rendering.

[Angrybird 12]

Originally Posted by Eich

Was the 1967 Camaro a muscle car? I'd say it was a bit smaller than today's car.

Park next to a 4th gen if you want to see a smaller Camaro too.