05-23-2015, 11:35 AM | #71 |
Drives: '16 Camaro SS 6 spd manual transm. Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: RGV Texas
Posts: 1,463
|
If this is only an option, I don't see any problem with that. There should be a choice for everybody.
I was surprised when I read on MT, on how the lap times improved on the Porsche Carrera S4 (that has 4WD) VS a RWD Porsche Carrera S. Now days you see 4WD sport cars everywhere Lamborguini, Nissan GTR, Porsche, Audi, etc. it's very common, most people believed that an automatic was never going to be better than a standard transmission at the track. Porsche prove the contrary the automatic PDK Porsches are faster, Ferrari, BMW, Audi, Nissan GTR, McLaren has them, and they are better, improving lap times. Is just a matter of choice, going with the future or sticking in the past. One of the Top Lap times at Nurburgring was done by a Porsche Hybrid: Porsche 918 spider. |
05-23-2015, 12:41 PM | #72 |
The BEAST
Drives: '16 2SS, '89 Wife Join Date: May 2015
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 2,034
|
If there's a market for it, why not?
I live in sunny california, i never have to worry about snow or ice, but i know that there are other americans across the country who do, and for them an AWD camaro would be a great buy. So here's what i would like: options. I would like the option to pick either AWD or RWD when i buy a camaro, so people across the country who may benefit from AWD can get theirs, and people who, like me, live in snowless states/areas can enjoy a lighter and more traditional RWD pony car. I just hope that if AWD is forced, it has an active option to redistribute the power to at least 99% to the rear... |
05-23-2015, 02:40 PM | #73 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 1SS/RS Coupe L99, Stainless Power Works LT Headers, SCT X4 Custom Tune from RDP, CAI Inc. Air Intake w/ Apex Scoop, VMAX CNC Ported Throttle Body, Solo Axle-Back Exhaust w/ J-pipes, Apex Catch Can, Husky Splash Guards, Heritage Grille, 3D Carbon Rear Spoiler, Oracle Chrome Turn Signal Bulbs, GM Reverse Light Trim Billets, Gorilla Black Locking Lugs, Emblem Pros Retro SS Badges/Custom Retro SS Kickplates/Under-hood Bowtie, 35% window Tint, Nitto Motivo Tires (6-8-18)
|
|
05-23-2015, 02:51 PM | #74 |
|
Fine, but here's my take on this "option" (and I could be wrong). There is no way you can have AWD without beefing up the front suspension, transmission, and possibly rear suspension also, IMO. That said, Camaro did significant things to this car to reduce the overall weight - wonderful. But I don't think GM is going to offer two different frames/suspensions/etc. on the Camaro platform, on the whim that someone may want AWD. This will jack up the cost of production and MSRP. And if they make it an "option" for any variant of the Camaro, ALL Camaros will have to be beefed up and, thereby, cancel out that weight loss they managed... and raise the price across the board.
__________________
2013 1SS/RS Coupe L99, Stainless Power Works LT Headers, SCT X4 Custom Tune from RDP, CAI Inc. Air Intake w/ Apex Scoop, VMAX CNC Ported Throttle Body, Solo Axle-Back Exhaust w/ J-pipes, Apex Catch Can, Husky Splash Guards, Heritage Grille, 3D Carbon Rear Spoiler, Oracle Chrome Turn Signal Bulbs, GM Reverse Light Trim Billets, Gorilla Black Locking Lugs, Emblem Pros Retro SS Badges/Custom Retro SS Kickplates/Under-hood Bowtie, 35% window Tint, Nitto Motivo Tires (6-8-18)
|
05-23-2015, 05:07 PM | #75 | |
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
|
Quote:
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
05-23-2015, 05:55 PM | #76 | |
Drives: Four wheels and an engine Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Garage
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
How would the beefed up from sub-frame affect the non AWD version? We have Corvettes and Camaros that can take down sports car (or performance cars if you like) that cost two or three times as much, no need to complicate that with AWD. |
|
05-23-2015, 10:03 PM | #77 |
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,502
|
|
05-23-2015, 10:54 PM | #78 | |
KaBoom1701
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,630
|
Quote:
The obvious choice is LT4 640+hp. GTR killer....
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats. |
|
05-23-2015, 11:22 PM | #79 |
Drives: 1998 Z28 M6 Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12
|
I'm a die-hard RWD fan and love my 4th M6 LS1 gen for the raw experience and lack of electrical nannies; that being said, I've driven my dad's A6 Corvette GS and you end up turning the faster times with electrical aids on. Having the car being able to help you with your available traction RELIABLY gives you confidence to push it to limits (with help from time to time) and drive faster. One car is absolute proof of this; the Nissan GTR. The fact that it's an overweight pig it laps faster than a Corvette Z06. The only reason it's capable of doing this is an amazing AWD and traction management system (ok and the short gearing and turbo V6 deserve credit). GM has already said the front engine RWD setup is what limits the car right now.
So while I'd love to see the Camaro keep a RWD option (it's what I'd buy anyways) if the platform allows for an AWD power train why not offer it? Also; if they made an all out AWD LT4 stripped down version like the C5 Z28, can we agree that Z48 is an appropriate model name? Last edited by Blazin40s; 05-23-2015 at 11:29 PM. Reason: Also |
05-24-2015, 11:05 AM | #80 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
Like most others I would only be okay with it if it didn't drive cost and weight up of the 2wd versions.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
05-24-2015, 11:32 AM | #81 | |
|
Quote:
Should i start a petetion asking GM to not make it available for anyone ? That's a nonsense way of thinking , let alone for a potencilally financial advantage on selling more cars than the other guys around in the same field It make no sense at all from the business point of view If one think the way you are thinking , the auto industry ( IE) Camaro included will be still looking like the first G , no new anything added over the years |
|
05-24-2015, 11:39 AM | #82 |
|
|
05-24-2015, 11:40 AM | #83 |
Drives: 1999 camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: calif
Posts: 43
|
How about an option for an all out performance camaro with AWD, an NA LS7 worked over to get more than 600 hp and 600 LB-ft of torque, light body, big brakes, paddle shifted and performance better than the current Z-28 ? Something that can easily compete with a porsche gt3 ?
|
05-24-2015, 01:47 PM | #84 |
Drives: 1987 IROC-Z 5.7L 2016 1SS M6 NGM Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 280
|
Probably would only be available with an automatic transmission. I read an article years ago in Hotrod Magazine about an all wheel steering IROC, never happened. All wheel drive has been considered many times before but never happened. Unless you want a jacked up 4x4 Camaro. It should be an option. I would like to see it available for the V6 with a twin turbo, and manual transmission. Like an analog version of the GTR R35 except half the price, and twice the looks.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|