Homepage Garage Wiki Register Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2016, 07:43 AM   #1
Knein
 
Drives: 2016 2SS Hyper Blue M6 NPP/Mag
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 197
SS vs Scat Pack

How come there aren't any discussions on here about the Challenger Scat Pack? Everyone keeps talking about the mustang. Just curious. Maybe they did and I missed it.
Knein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 08:33 AM   #2
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,035
Because the Scat Pack is a 4200+ pound tank, that has mediocre handling and braking...that's my guess.
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 08:49 AM   #3
Atra
 
Drives: 16' 1SS M6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: GA
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUMMIT WHITE SS View Post
Because the Scat Pack is a 4200+ pound tank, that has mediocre handling and braking...that's my guess.
This. Sadly. Love the way the car looks but I like to make turns once and a while.
__________________
Nightfall Grey 1SS 56F Black Bowties
Atra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 08:56 AM   #4
Factorypilot
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knein View Post
How come there aren't any discussions on here about the Challenger Scat Pack? Everyone keeps talking about the mustang. Just curious. Maybe they did and I missed it.


Starts at 1:31. Scat Pack beats the new SS by .2 in the 1/4, BUT....

The Scat had DR's, the Camaro was totally stock AND the Camaro guy was more than a tenth of a second slower on the reaction time
(Scat RT = .8409, Camaro RT = .9695).
Factorypilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 09:45 AM   #5
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factorypilot View Post


Starts at 1:31. Scat Pack beats the new SS by .2 in the 1/4, BUT....

The Scat had DR's, the Camaro was totally stock AND the Camaro guy was more than a tenth of a second slower on the reaction time
(Scat RT = .8409, Camaro RT = .9695).
Reaction time doesn't have a bearing on ET.
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 10:07 AM   #6
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,022
Love the Scat Pack. Amazing how large it looks next to the Camaro.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 10:12 AM   #7
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 4,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knein View Post
How come there aren't any discussions on here about the Challenger Scat Pack? Everyone keeps talking about the mustang. Just curious. Maybe they did and I missed it.
The title of this thread doen't make you think it's what you are looking for, but it is.

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=435642
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 12:01 PM   #8
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factorypilot View Post


Starts at 1:31. Scat Pack beats the new SS by .2 in the 1/4, BUT....

The Scat had DR's, the Camaro was totally stock AND the Camaro guy was more than a tenth of a second slower on the reaction time
(Scat RT = .8409, Camaro RT = .9695).
This video means nothing as a race that close is driver ability to driver ability...

Plus, as you said, the Scat Pack is on a drag radial, compared to the run flats on the SS...put the stock tires on the Scat Pack and see what happens.

Not to mention, did this guy record the same thing on an autocross? I wonder why...
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 12:37 PM   #9
1968ss350
 
1968ss350's Avatar
 
Drives: 1968 Camaro SS 350
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 246
Actually the Camaro has the higher MPH which indicates it has better power to weight ratio... This is a great match up and really the 60' times in the Challenger with DRs aren't all that good. Pretty sure that Maro with some good tires could get in the high 1.70s
__________________
1968 Camaro SS 350 Lemans Blue
-350 10.4:1 comp, Edelbrock Etec 200 heads, Comp XR288HR cam,AED750dp worked, Tremec TKO 600, console gauges w/tic toc tach, Moser 12 bolt, 4 wheel Willwoods

Hyper Blue 2SS/6 speed, NPP, MRC, Nav, 5LQ 6 piston brakes, Black split spoke, Magnuson 2300 Heartbeat Supercharger, Flowtie upper grill
1968ss350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 03:43 PM   #10
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 4,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1968ss350 View Post
Actually the Camaro has the higher MPH which indicates it has better power to weight ratio... This is a great match up and really the 60' times in the Challenger with DRs aren't all that good. Pretty sure that Maro with some good tires could get in the high 1.70s
There's a 1.77 60' on stock tires already on the fast list
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 04:39 PM   #11
1968ss350
 
1968ss350's Avatar
 
Drives: 1968 Camaro SS 350
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
There's a 1.77 60' on stock tires already on the fast list
MOVIN!!!
__________________
1968 Camaro SS 350 Lemans Blue
-350 10.4:1 comp, Edelbrock Etec 200 heads, Comp XR288HR cam,AED750dp worked, Tremec TKO 600, console gauges w/tic toc tach, Moser 12 bolt, 4 wheel Willwoods

Hyper Blue 2SS/6 speed, NPP, MRC, Nav, 5LQ 6 piston brakes, Black split spoke, Magnuson 2300 Heartbeat Supercharger, Flowtie upper grill
1968ss350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 05:24 PM   #12
drivingagain

 
drivingagain's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Tiger XCX,2016 Camaro 1SS,LBZ!
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,329
Yeah the challenger scat pack is closer to 4400 pounds. This is not a sports car. This is also why the Hellcat has not chance at the track. Starting to get into Bentley continental GT weights here. LOL I will say I love the looks of one though. They look the part.
drivingagain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 05:30 PM   #13
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,000
The Scat Pack is 4,225 based on a recently weighed one over on Challengertalk. The SRT392 is 4,260ish I think.

The Hellcat is 4,400 though..ish.
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 05:56 PM   #14
vince3
 
Drives: Hyper Blue 16' M6 1ss
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 170
2004?
vince3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.