10-24-2013, 12:59 AM | #15 |
Drives: 13' 1LE Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,642
|
The extra cubic sure did help a lot. That 392 is really thirsty too.. Sorry but GM has the better engines IMO.
__________________
13' 1LE
Old setup: TSP 231-236/Tick 660/.105 PR, UDP, SW LT 2'' & HFC, stock NPP & H pipe, VR-DRX CAI, air scoop, Goertz1 manifold, 102mm BBK, 26" Toyo DRs, Forgestars R17x10 & F18x8, rear seat delete, remote Pat G tune Autocal, 7400 limiter, Spec Mini Twin. 91oct. 11.90@122.3, 0-60ft 2.0 / 11.99@123.6, 0-60ft 2.1 DA+819 ...519RWHP SAE Solid roller SBE LS3, FED, LLSR, 91oct, 605rwhp N/A. Tuned by Pat G. Build by me. |
10-25-2013, 08:15 AM | #16 |
Drives: 2012 Charger Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 64
|
How so? 6.4 Hemi isn't even Direct Injection and makes 470/470, it also has an active intake manifold and VVT. If they decide to put DI on the 6.4 it will easily be over 500hp and torque. 6.2 LT1makes 460/460 using DI so it still makes less power and torque but I will give you it will be more fuel effecient than the Hemi will be. But besides mpg I don't see the LT1 being a better engine than the 6.4 mopar. I just wish Mopar would start using aluminum blocks to get the weight down, that would be an easy 75-100lb weight reduction form already heavy cars, jeez!
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|