Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2015, 12:54 AM   #29
DevonK
 
DevonK's Avatar
 
Drives: TBD
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 179
Fun fact: The SS braking and skidpad performance numbers are identical to the MT-tested results for the new Miata. It will be interesting to see the SS's figure 8 times from MT.

The Miata's 1/4 mile times are not quite a match for the SS's, but the 14.5@94.2 MT results aren't that far off the turbo 4's.
DevonK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 12:57 AM   #30
Arrow signs
 
Drives: Chevy Duramax
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 57
3685 weight loss -- Awesome!!! Great #s
Arrow signs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:03 AM   #31
DevonK
 
DevonK's Avatar
 
Drives: TBD
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 179
16-17 feet longer to stop the SS compared to the C7 - not good. What are the GT/PP numbers?
DevonK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:09 AM   #32
Zultain7
 
Zultain7's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Petaluma, California
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevonK View Post
16-17 feet longer to stop the SS compared to the C7 - not good. What are the GT/PP numbers?
60-0 is 109ft
__________________
Hyper Blue 2SS Auto, Duel Mode Exhaust, MCR, Nav, Black 5 Spoke
Ordered on 8/29
2000 Status on 9/1
3000 Status on 9/3
3300 Status on 10/8
3400 Status on 10/9
3800 Status on 10/19
Delivery 12/28
Zultain7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:09 AM   #33
233
 
Drives: I have a bike.
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: IN
Posts: 87
4.0 seconds. Nice.
233 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:12 AM   #34
Sledgehammer70
Lethal Camaro
 
Sledgehammer70's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
Some extra white LT images posted here now: http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showth...=415175&page=4

Last edited by Sledgehammer70; 09-14-2015 at 01:24 AM.
Sledgehammer70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:16 AM   #35
VF-22
 
Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zultain7 View Post
This is all fantastic news! Thinking of something that'll upset the mustang guys more is the 2.0L Turbo is faster than the EcoBoost. From what I've found the EcoBoost is 0-60 in 5.6 and the quarter mile in 14.1 @ 98mph.
Auto Mustang EB with PP is around 5.2 in the 60. Auto Mustang EB without PP is around 5.6 in the 60. Though don't forget that the EB w/PP is running a 3.55 axle while without it's a 3.15 axle. Camaro is running 2.77s in the Autos. Not sure if a optional axle ratio is offered in the auto transmissions in the Camaro. The 3.55's in the GT are the best for the AUto transmission in the Mustang.

But obviously this is still pretty stunning...a base auto EB is around 3,524 so the base T4 is 185 lbs lighter at 3,339, has about 35 hp less and 25 less TQ yet is faster by a tenth of a second. Can't imagine what it's going to be able to do with a tune/parts.

Still would go with the V6 though. Beats out their EB with PP and is a much more reliable engine IMO and it's 60 and 1/4 look good. That's a damn fast car.

The SS #s are absurd...lol.
VF-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:18 AM   #36
camaza
 
Drives: Toyota Tacoma
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevonK View Post
16-17 feet longer to stop the SS compared to the C7 - not good. What are the GT/PP numbers?
Most tests I've seen are 107-108 feet (with P Zero run flats which is a pretty outdated tire at this point) something not adding up there - looking forward to some independent tests.
camaza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:28 AM   #37
Sledgehammer70
Lethal Camaro
 
Sledgehammer70's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
It's amazing to see how much more support the convertibles get.



Sledgehammer70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:30 AM   #38
G-Mann
 
Drives: 2015 F22 M235i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 24
Chevy did its fans right with the weight reduction and performance numbers. Would have been awesome to get this without a price increase but at least your getting some serious bang for your buck increase. zl1 numbers are going to be scary, 3.6 and 11.7.
__________________
15 M235i, Juice Boxed
G-Mann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:31 AM   #39
TJ91
:chevy:
 
TJ91's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT/RS
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 13,033
Did they get the braking numbers wrong?
Im going to assume it will be 110 or less in other tests

These numbers are amazing. Truly are, GM raises the bar AGAIN


Now the real question, what incentive does a buyer get moving to the v6 when we know the turbo 4 can be modded to make some serious numbers
__________________
CAMARO
Consult your doctor before taking Camaro
Side effects include Sudden increase in Heart Rate, Insomnia and occasional hallucinations
If you experience Permagrin exceeding 4 hours after taking Camaro, seek immediate Camaro5 Help
CAMARO Bringing excitment back into the Garage
TJ91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:33 AM   #40
Zultain7
 
Zultain7's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Petaluma, California
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by VF-22 View Post
Auto Mustang EB with PP is around 5.2 in the 60. Auto Mustang EB without PP is around 5.6 in the 60. Though don't forget that the EB w/PP is running a 3.55 axle while without it's a 3.15 axle. Camaro is running 2.77s in the Autos. Not sure if a optional axle ratio is offered in the auto transmissions in the Camaro. The 3.55's in the GT are the best for the AUto transmission in the Mustang.

But obviously this is still pretty stunning...a base auto EB is around 3,524 so the base T4 is 185 lbs lighter at 3,339, has about 35 hp less and 25 less TQ yet is faster by a tenth of a second. Can't imagine what it's going to be able to do with a tune/parts.

Still would go with the V6 though. Beats out their EB with PP and is a much more reliable engine IMO and it's 60 and 1/4 look good. That's a damn fast car.

The SS #s are absurd...lol.
I understand the PP adds a little, I should have said stock. However, it is still a bit humorus how close they are .
__________________
Hyper Blue 2SS Auto, Duel Mode Exhaust, MCR, Nav, Black 5 Spoke
Ordered on 8/29
2000 Status on 9/1
3000 Status on 9/3
3300 Status on 10/8
3400 Status on 10/9
3800 Status on 10/19
Delivery 12/28
Zultain7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:36 AM   #41
DanSS24

 
DanSS24's Avatar
 
Drives: Dream Cars in my head
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 808
Posts: 1,290
Lovin this...3685 lbs. Great job, Chevy.
__________________

Wishful thinking...but I sure can dream big.
DanSS24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 01:38 AM   #42
VF-22
 
Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zultain7 View Post
I understand the PP adds a little, I should have said stock. However, it is still a bit humorus how close they are .
Oh it's absurd how close they are and the V6 beats out the EB with PP.

The SS #s are nuts. Just nuts.

Plus think about gas savings also with an auto and AFM/weight savings.
VF-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.