08-26-2014, 07:49 PM | #1 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
Redline D4 versus MTL in the TR6060
So, brought up for knowledge share, so don't flame.
I have done much searching on this forum, and most agree that the manual TR6060s respond very well to D4. Those who had cold fluid grinds seem particularly happy. Makes sense, since the viscosity of the D4 at cold temps is much, much thinner than the factory fill, while still maintaining the same viscosity as the factory fill at operating temperature. I have been blessed with zero grinds to this point. Many have demonized the idea of using MTL, even when others report positive results. The logic is that it is too thick to properly lubricate the TR6060 with its tight tolerances. On the Corvette forums, it has been recommended to do a mix, usually 3 parts D4 to 1 part MTL. No one on this forum has reported trying it. The logic there is you thicken it up a little bit for hot weather while keeping the benefits of the thinner fluid. I was curious, as some in the Corvette forums have reported that the notoriously noise TR6060 is quieter with the MTL (or at least a mix). For you Camaro TR6060 owners, if you listened carefully, I'm sure you'd agree that the tranny is louder when the fluid is very hot (approximately 180 degrees on the gauge, for those with 2SS option). The D4 seems a little more quiet than the factory fill at all temperatures, but it too is louder when hot than when cold. So, I wrote Redline. Here is the email string (with my info redacted, as well as the Redline employee as a courtesy). Read from the bottom up: Joe,Bottom line, it seems perfectly reasonable for the road racers or those in really hot weather to use a mix of D4 and MTL. Is you look at the viscosity info, they are really not that far off, especially if you mix. Further, a thinner mix of the two might quiet down the trannies, if you care about such things: D4 What say you? |
08-27-2014, 03:40 PM | #2 |
'69 Owned Since '79
Drives: '69 Z/28 LeMans Blue w/White Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: LR AR
Posts: 1,847
|
You are splitting hairs. The D4 is marginally better on street cars in cold weather. The MTL is slightly better for race conditions. Both are good and compatible. Blend them and you get somewhere in the middle. JMO.
-Mark. |
08-27-2014, 04:38 PM | #3 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
Ummm. I think that is what I was saying
Point here, anyone considering MTL in the 6060 on this site has been demonized, and I'm not sure why. I quick search and you'll see what I mean. Looking to see if there was an effective counter-argument to using it. |
08-27-2014, 05:37 PM | #4 |
Drives: '14 2SS/RS Vert 6M/KTU/NPP/DTA/ARH Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,826
|
Do you really think an upgrade over the stock fluid is required for street use? My '14 2SS shifts just fine.
__________________
Consensus is, by definition, a lack of leadership.
|
08-27-2014, 07:59 PM | #5 |
Eh, that'll happen
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
|
Because Tremec said NO to oil. It doesnt matter what Redline says because it is not in their power to say that it is ok to go against what a manufacturer says. If you wanna run oil, have at it. But if Tremec wanted oil inside there, they would have put it there.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
|
08-27-2014, 09:51 PM | #6 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
"Cause Tremec says so" is not a valid response, though I'm sure someone will jump in with "+1" or "THIS."
Anyone with any sense knows there are multiple reasons for manufacturers of engines, diffs, and transmissions to choose the viscosity fluid that they "require," and part longevity is just one number in the equation that equals "compatibility." There are also considerations like fluid cost and availability, contract talks with fluid manufacturers, previous legal rulings, fuel mileage, cold weather drive-ability, previous customer feedback, etc, etc. No matter how much that is discussed, folks still like to get on the internet and say stuff like "if you use anything but the manufacturer specified fluid brand and viscosity, your part is doomed for failure and they won't honor the warranty." I haven't decided on MTL (or to "have at it"), but was hoping someone would have insight into the additives, viscosity, etc that make it good or bad for our trannies. |
08-27-2014, 10:34 PM | #7 |
Eh, that'll happen
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
|
Not sure what response you're looking for. If you wanna run oil, then do it. "Because Tremec says so" is good enough for me. They designed and built the tranny. Why should I question what they say? Just dont come on here and whine when you're shit breaks because you went against the MFR suggested fluid.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
|
08-27-2014, 10:52 PM | #8 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
LOL, nice, constructive argument. I'll stick with the D4 because you don't want me to whine. Got it.
Are you anti-D4 because Tremec recommends Mobile 1? |
08-28-2014, 12:12 AM | #9 |
Drives: 2010 Inferno Orange 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clermont, IN
Posts: 3,297
|
I've never tried it, but I don't have any shifting issues. I also don't use synthetic fluids in any of my cars. AND none of them have self destructed. I used Shell Spirax...which is a common ATF used in boat transmissions.
I say go for it...at least the blend. I think you will get the best of both worlds. Good luck.
__________________
2010 Inferno Orange 2SS/RS M6 Black Leather, Sun Roof, OBX Headers, Borla touring axle back, Cold Air Inductions CAI , non synthetic fluids, BMR total bushing upgrade/1" lowering springs, DSE 32mm rear sway bar. GM fe4 shocks/struts/LCA's, AAM 3.91 diff, Vertini RFS1.8 20x9 +30. Conti ExtremeContact Sport 275/35/20. sjm autoprod ABL dash kit. Mike Norris tuned 413/419.
Avenging Orange: 43 years of not buying into the Hype........and damn proud of it!! https://youtu.be/9JD9it6SmB8 https://youtu.be/xmelTlEzI34 KICKING CANCERS ASS SINCE 2015!! |
08-28-2014, 12:39 AM | #10 | |
Eh, that'll happen
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
|
Quote:
No, I am not anti-D4. I run it. Mobil 1 and Redline are BRANDS. Changing to a different brand is not the same as changing to a different fluid. Nice comparison.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
|
|
08-28-2014, 09:25 AM | #11 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
376, thank you for your input. "Tremec says so" doesn't do it for me, but I do acknowledge they MIGHT have a valid mechanical reason for forbidding slightly thicker fluid. Although, I have yet to hear actual confirmation that thickening it slightly over stock ATF is specifically forbidden by Tremec, to say nothing of the reason for such a prohibition.
It is also seems you might be putting stock in the names, "lube versus fluid." Allegedly, MTL is just a thicker D4 with all the same additives and properties -- it is not like going from red fluid to a thick brown oil. I might be wrong there. I really wish I could find the viscosity for the factory fill Texaco ATF. For instance, if its viscosity at 40 degrees C is 50 and at 100 degrees C it is 7, that might shed some light on what is acceptable. In that case, you could say that cold MTL (even straight without mixing with D4) is only slightly thicker than the factory, and at 100 degrees it is only as thick as the factory fluid is at roughly 90 degrees. It might also shed some light on why D4 is such an improvement over the stock fluid. |
08-28-2014, 03:52 PM | #12 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
So I exchanged emails with Tremec, and I also just called them to be absolutely sure about what I read in the email.
The rep there states there is indeed NO PROHIBITION against using a thicker fluid like MTL. He further stated that the "internet knowledge" that the tolerances are so tight on TR6060s, and thus demand the thinner ATFs, is not true. Honestly, I didn't get the warm and fuzzies about the guy's knowledge or care factor with the question. Obviously, Tremec is not stationing its top engineers in the Customer Support Section. So, take it for what it is worth. |
08-28-2014, 08:28 PM | #13 |
Eh, that'll happen
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
|
Im with you man. The reason I say I go with what Tremec says is because this discussion has been around since the T56. There have been numerous people that have written, called, emailed Tremec about running oil in the tranny and Tremec always comes back and says stick to ATF. I would think since the TR6060 has a pump in it, you wouldnt want to go much thicker than the recommended viscosity. Thats why I dont run anything thicker than 30w through my engine. Thats what that pump was designed to move. In the end, Im sure running MTL will be fine. There are people that have run it on here and there are vendors that encourage its use. Use everyones advice as you will. Will I do it? No.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
|
08-30-2014, 03:52 PM | #14 |
Drives: 73 VETTE ,, 05 2500hd diesel,14 1LE Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Left lane PHOENIX AZ
Posts: 2,626
|
Ran MTL in my 2000 Z28 ,run it in my 73 Corvette M22, but in the 2014 1LE I'm running D4 . I was going to run the MTL ,but figured why take a chance . Seams to me in high heat and road race /track use the MTL would be better . Since my car shifted great with the factory fluid ,I just changed it at 2000 miles to get the junk out and went with D4. I felt no difference shifting at all . I bet in a hot climate it would make no difference ,but below 40 degrees I could see where the MTL might be a problem.
__________________
OLD GUY FLYING FAST AND LOW
|
|
|
|
|