Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > I4 Turbo LTG Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2017, 10:50 AM   #15
Adp2017
 
Adp2017's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 RS Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ink28 View Post
I ran the Injen intake for awhile switched back to stock an the car ran better stock
What set-up did you have?
__________________
2017 1LT | RS | 2.0T | M6

331 rwhp , 350 rwtq

ZZP Intercooler | ZZP Catted DP | Magnaflow Catback | Injen CAI | Tuned (BBR) | CNC Honed Turbo (TPC) w 14lb actuator
Adp2017 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2017, 02:41 PM   #16
Mishimoto
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Mostly Stock
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corner carver View Post
Check out the development of the mishimoto intake for some 'honest' results
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsanchez18 View Post
Yeah, I've been waiting for their updates
Thanks guys!

Updates will be coming very soon, within the next week or so. Stay tuned! For anyone else interested, take a look at our thread. In our most recent update, we had an interesting issue pop up that took a while to solve, but we got the design just right!

We are waiting on our production samples to arrive so I can show everyone what the final product will look like. Keep an eye on our thread and blog!
Mishimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2017, 03:22 PM   #17
Corner carver

 
Corner carver's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishimoto View Post
Thanks guys!

Updates will be coming very soon, within the next week or so. Stay tuned! For anyone else interested, take a look at our thread. In our most recent update, we had an interesting issue pop up that took a while to solve, but we got the design just right!

We are waiting on our production samples to arrive so I can show everyone what the final product will look like. Keep an eye on our thread and blog!
Thank you guys for all the great research info and upcoming/ knowingly awesome parts you have up your sleeves!
Corner carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2017, 07:51 PM   #18
ChicagoTommy

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post


Dyno graph from injen on the EVO7300


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I suspected they were using the biggest gain on the graph, even though it's not peak gain like most people believe. Still, +23hp/+55tq is healthy at the peak, once you realized it has clearly been tuned as well since the info for runs 5 & 6 are omitted and the afr is the same even with higher airflow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adp2017 View Post
What set-up did you have?
I'd like to know this too. I was pretty stoked about the EVO7300, but if he's having problems, I can go another route.
ChicagoTommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2017, 08:14 PM   #19
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoTommy View Post
I suspected they were using the biggest gain on the graph, even though it's not peak gain like most people believe. Still, +23hp/+55tq is healthy at the peak, once you realized it has clearly been tuned as well since the info for runs 5 & 6 are omitted and the afr is the same even with higher airflow.



I'd like to know this too. I was pretty stoked about the EVO7300, but if he's having problems, I can go another route.


I suspect you are right about the Dyno comparison. Probably kept the worst baseline run and the best run with their intake, maybe tuned it while they were at it...

When I do my Dyno testing I throw out all the really high runs from the baseline vs test product, as well as the lowest runs and try to compare an average, but usually make enough pulls to get repeating numbers each way to show a good middle of the road comparison.

I went ahead and ordered the evo7300


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2017, 10:56 PM   #20
Ink28
 
Ink28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2.0t
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Nazareth pa
Posts: 48
The open injen intake
Ink28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2017, 02:05 AM   #21
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ink28 View Post
The open injen intake
I've had zero issues with the injen open intake myself I did put some weather stripping around the bottom so it's more sealed from the engine-bay heat though.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 01:12 PM   #22
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab


Well look what showed up already!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2017, 06:40 AM   #23
Corner carver

 
Corner carver's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post


Well look what showed up already!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#win
Corner carver is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.