Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2017, 04:23 PM   #1
rotohead
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro RS
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 45
IAT

I'm in the process of adding the K&N cold air intake to my 2017 3.6L RS, I thinking of trying and old IAT resistor box from years gone by to fool the computer into thinking it colder that is thus the computer will either go rich or lean depending on the setting of the rheostat and advance or retard the timing.
rotohead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 04:30 AM   #2
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
You are asking for more trouble than the gains. People have tried the IAT resistor mods for ages, been proven many times they don't work. Not sure why people want to trick the computer to think it is colder outside than it really is, it isn't just enrichment table it messes with, also affects a timing table as well.
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:26 AM   #3
Megahurtz
Snackbar Tuning
 
Megahurtz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,104
thats a terrible idea
Megahurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 01:31 PM   #4
I`m Batman
 
I`m Batman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS M6
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 393
Won't your run the risk of getting knock at that point if the computer thinks that IAT is colder than it really is? Seems like a bad idea like others have said.

Last edited by I`m Batman; 06-26-2017 at 04:13 PM.
I`m Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 03:29 PM   #5
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
You'll either run too lean and get knock due to the combustion chamber getting too hot or you'll run too rich and foul your catalytic converters - run too cool and fail to even combust all the fuel and just waste gas.

Why would anyone think this is a good idea? do they think the manufacturers are running an inefficient mix?

This sounds like something that was invented to jerry rig fix a problem they were having with some piece of crap car at some point in the past and it got passed around by word of mouth that seemed to work if what you were working on was old malfunctioning cars that you didn't want to properly fix.

Worse than the Tornado, because at least with that scam, as long as it didn't self destruct, it wasn't really going to hurt anything. I can't see how this hijacking of the af ratio idea couldn't negatively impact the car. It literally has no positive aspects.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 04:05 PM   #6
slick3

 
Drives: Garnet Red - 20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,010
Please no.
slick3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2017, 08:12 AM   #7
rotohead
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro RS
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 45
Aftermarket Throttle Controllers runs off the IAT and the TPS, I'm doing the same thing just cleaner without the black box reading it, I can turn this one off do a reset and bingo it's gone, Cats were the first thing replaced with high flow, I live in a State without the silly azz inspections who tell you what you can't do to your car but can dump ethanol in your gas that plays heck with the engine.
rotohead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2017, 06:42 PM   #8
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotohead View Post
Aftermarket Throttle Controllers runs off the IAT and the TPS, I'm doing the same thing just cleaner without the black box reading it, I can turn this one off do a reset and bingo it's gone, Cats were the first thing replaced with high flow, I live in a State without the silly azz inspections who tell you what you can't do to your car but can dump ethanol in your gas that plays heck with the engine.


Have you ever looked at the calibration on the newer GM engines? There is a lot more to tuning now then there every was back in the 80's and 90's. So many tables all cross reference each other now. Plus the new LTx series engine controllers reference actual torque output in order to determine how much power/torque you get delivered when you step on the pedal.

The only way to fix any lag issues are via a custom calibration, no other way around that. No 3rd party black boxes are going to work miracles anymore.
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2017, 07:21 PM   #9
glenB
 
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
Go ahead, do it no problem.

BTW, what model do you have maybe I could use some extra parts
glenB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 06:05 PM   #10
gringo
Account Suspended
 
gringo's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro V6
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,722
It'll work, but you need a lower temp thermostat to make it work effectively. On my old truck, I spliced a 330 ohm resistor in the line leading to the IAT. Even during high outside temps, the truck always ran crisp, responsive and pulled hard.

Not sure about the LGX, but on the LFX you had to source another IAT sensor and mount it in a better location, like the air intake filter box, for it to read a more accurate temp versus the stock heatsoaked location at the MAF sensor.
gringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 06:44 PM   #11
rotohead
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro RS
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 45
I was going with the 330 or 470 ohm that would put the temp around 165 to 175, I was going to move the sensor out of the air tube on the K&N, The thermostat is the hanging spot for now.
rotohead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 07:21 PM   #12
glenB
 
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotohead View Post
I was going with the 330 or 470 ohm that would put the temp around 165 to 175, I was going to move the sensor out of the air tube on the K&N, The thermostat is the hanging spot for now.
Why don't you just get a remote mount IAT sensor

https://www.vectormotorsports.com/sh...duction-kit-2/
glenB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 07:41 PM   #13
Snowblind

 
Snowblind's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
I believe the ECU will not start to pull timing until it sees temps over 130 degrees. If you are keeping the stock intake box then you may not be reaching those temps anyways, the cold air design is pretty good at keeping hot engine air out.

What temps are you seeing now, are you logging them ?

How about your current A/F, what are you seeing there ? I would be careful with what you are trying to gain here...you have much more to lose imo. Spend the dough and get a REAL tune, it's really the best (and safest) way to do it.
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
Snowblind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2017, 07:08 PM   #14
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowblind View Post
I believe the ECU will not start to pull timing until it sees temps over 130 degrees. If you are keeping the stock intake box then you may not be reaching those temps anyways, the cold air design is pretty good at keeping hot engine air out.

What temps are you seeing now, are you logging them ?

How about your current A/F, what are you seeing there ? I would be careful with what you are trying to gain here...you have much more to lose imo. Spend the dough and get a REAL tune, it's really the best (and safest) way to do it.


You are incorrect, on the stock IAT table the ECM starts pulling timing at 85° at 1° of timing pull, by 120° it is pulling around 7°-8° of timing.

Wont do any good to remote mount the IAT, the MAF is damn near sitting inside of the airbox on the new LT1 setup.
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.