06-14-2017, 05:26 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2016 1ss camaro Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: 909
Posts: 9,816
|
Track Downforce??
so does anybody care other than me to increase there on track downforce? maybe start with functional front splitter? the hard part is how do you know what would be functional or not
i have seen a few companies out there with something but anybody have any testing on any of them? also do those canards or wickerbill add ons do anything? also btw i know once the zl1 1le everybody and there mom will be riding around with that wing on there car lol
__________________
16 1SS NIGHTFALL GRAY METALLIC WITH NPP #BECAUSERACECAR #SAVETHEMANUALS
|
06-14-2017, 05:30 PM | #2 |
#becauseracecar
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
|
This is just my opinion and others may disagree, but until you start going light weight, full race suspension, and slicks, big aero won't make any appreciable difference on our car because you won't be going fast enough in the corners to generate enough downforce. And any downforce you do generate will be on the straights and will just slow you down. I'm definitely open to hear other people's thoughts though. Our cars are already pretty flat underneath I believe. Maybe some dive planes? I could be wrong but it sure doesn't seem like my corner speeds are enough on street tires and full weight to justify it. I'm definitely open to hearing others opinion though because more downforce would be nice.
Last edited by Eric SS; 06-14-2017 at 05:54 PM. |
06-14-2017, 06:14 PM | #3 | |
Drives: 2016 1SS Join Date: May 2016
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
The GM front splitter was designed at least in part in a wind tunnel according to GM. Wicker Bill maybe, but I doubt it would do any more than the stock SS wing. Canards help, I dont truly know how much though. My plan is to eventually go with 1LE suspension upgrade, replace some of the bushings in the front to help with deflection, rear ZL1 1LE wing, a front splitter (Im gonna wait for APR to make something), and dive planes, in that order (I already have ZL1 replical lip and skirts). However I am in no Hurry, and am just enjoying flogging a reliable and warrantied car. Personally, if you are not an experienced driver and always in an expert group, you shouldnt be looking for aero yet (If you goal is to develop). |
|
06-14-2017, 06:44 PM | #4 |
|
I don't see the stock SS spoiler do anything other than look pretty. I may be wrong. Wicker bill has to add more down force I would think. The ZL1 splitter and replicas have caused some interest and seems to add front end down force from what I'm hearing. Even at street speed
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS M6- Garage
|
06-14-2017, 07:32 PM | #5 |
Drives: ZL1 1LE Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: California
Posts: 1,297
|
I wouldn't worry about it. There are so many things you can do to become a faster driver before even thinking about aero.
__________________
|
06-14-2017, 07:46 PM | #6 |
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
Words of wisdom these. And if you just start adding "stuff" you'll disrupt F/R balance and make a car understeer or oversteer more. These cars have superb mechanical grip. Have fun and save your $. Unless the purpose is to look cool, of course
|
06-15-2017, 09:04 AM | #8 |
Drives: 22 1SS 1LE Summit White Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,144
|
personally I cay learn the car and its limits before adding parts. That said I think a front splitter would be the easiest and cheapest part to add.
__________________
#53 F Street
2022 Sponsor autocrossdigits.com Autocrossing Videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCm-...3tiMt0KOg_2Aag Instagram: apexit_53 2022 Rapid Blue 1SS 1LE 2019 D Street national champion (2019 civic Type R) |
06-15-2017, 09:10 AM | #9 |
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
Perhaps. And it would make the R lighter. Adding F splitter without balancing the R is a "no no". If you track your car that is.
|
06-15-2017, 09:15 AM | #10 | |
corner barstool sitter
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
Especially if you go at it with a "more's better" attitude. A car that becomes aerodynamically 'loose' would be scary, aerodynamically 'tight' perhaps frustrating. The original (huge) splitter on Vorshlag's red 5.0 Mustang (that eventually set all kinds of TT lap records a few years back) made that car horribly aero-loose. Norm
__________________
'08 GT coupe 5M (the occasional track toy)
'19 WRX 6M (the family sedan . . . seriously) |
|
06-15-2017, 09:40 AM | #11 | |
Drives: 2019 CLA 450 Mercedes Join Date: May 2016
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,107
|
Quote:
Driver upgrades are the best way to get faster around the track. If you are fast enough and can balance the car well enough, then an upgrade to slicks can help a great deal. Down side is the lack of warning before they let go. If you run on a track that has a long straight stretch, then more down force may be self-defeating.
__________________
2019 Lunar Blue Metallic Mercedes CLS 450
2021 C43 AMG Mercedes Coupe Metallic Cardinal Red 2014 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost (The Bus) |
|
06-15-2017, 09:42 AM | #12 |
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
I'd also add (to Norm's comments) that aero develops drag. Drag means slower speeds on straights. To get a benefit of aero firstly it has to have a proper BALANCE, secondly, a driver needs to be sufficiently skilled to go FASTER in fast corners (where aero works its magic).
There are folks that add wickers etc to the rear than wonder why the car understeers. So they spend more $ friggin with sways, or shocks, rake, etc. Like Norm said: NEVER change aero on one end ONLY as it will immediately change the car's designed balance. |
06-15-2017, 09:58 AM | #14 | |
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|