Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2015, 08:45 AM   #15
newb

 
newb's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
Pictures aren't showing on the last 2 posts
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.

Delivered 21 Jan 2013

newb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:46 AM   #16
Cipher21
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: VA
Posts: 240
are they being taken down by the site?
Cipher21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:46 AM   #17
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
4.6MPH and .5 seconds faster in the quarter.. Same day.. That's a whooping. Let the "fully loaded" excuse roll in from a certain crowd.

We all know that the Mustang can run faster in real world.. I bet so can the Camaro just as the Vette has.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:49 AM   #18
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,941
Pages aren't showing....I saw one earlier and now it is gone (the page Chef is describing). I started taking my own screenshots, but wasn't fast enough.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:50 AM   #19
newb

 
newb's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy View Post
4.6MPH and .5 seconds faster in the quarter.. Same day.. That's a whooping. Let the "fully loaded" excuse roll in from a certain crowd.

We all know that the Mustang can run faster in real world.. I bet so can the Camaro just as the Vette has.
That's not even a drivers race at that point. You can almost miss a gear and still win through the quarter.

And they will default back to the "GM bought the victory" argument.
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.

Delivered 21 Jan 2013

newb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:51 AM   #20
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
I have saved the ones that have been posted so far.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:53 AM   #21
Cipher21
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: VA
Posts: 240
I didn't get to read page 48 :(
Cipher21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:53 AM   #22
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy View Post
4.6MPH and .5 seconds faster in the quarter.. Same day.. That's a whooping. Let the "fully loaded" excuse roll in from a certain crowd.

We all know that the Mustang can run faster in real world.. I bet so can the Camaro just as the Vette has.
There was a shot of the Camaro interior, (not sure if it was of their actual test car) but if the car they are testing is really 3,672lbs, it must be a 1SS while the Mustang must be a premium GTPP to be that far over 3,800 pounds.

So I'm going to say something here that you will NOT find many do in a reverse situation on the Mustang6G site.....and stick up just a bit for the Mustang. Would have been more fair if the Mustang was a regular GT with PP to keep some weight off.

That said, it still would have been 3,750 to 3,800 pounds, and still would have gotten its butt handed to it in the 0 - 60 and 1/4 mile. Yes the Mustang has gone faster than that in the real world. So will the Camaro.

But its very likely we are going to see the Camaro do sub 12 second runs bone stock on the A8 equipped car as well. Just wait and let it happen folks.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:55 AM   #23
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
3,672 vs 3,825 pounds.. A 2SS still has a 70+ pound advantage over GT PP Premium as well.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:55 AM   #24
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by newb View Post
That's not even a drivers race at that point. You can almost miss a gear and still win through the quarter.

And they will default back to the "GM bought the victory" argument.
Wait until the comparisons from other mags come in, and show the same times as MT is getting for both cars. Then they can say GM bought every magazine lol.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:56 AM   #25
newb

 
newb's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
I missed 48 as well
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.

Delivered 21 Jan 2013

newb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:56 AM   #26
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy View Post
3,672 vs 3,825 pounds.. A 2SS still has a 70+ pound advantage over GT PP Premium as well.
Not really sure if its a 2SS? The interior shot might be of a 2SS (can't remember since the picture went away) but do we know for sure if the car the tested is?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:57 AM   #27
Curr
Probably doesn't like you
 
Curr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 WCT ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Boston-ish
Posts: 1,201
Use Imgur.com as a host instead of trying to load via the site? Can even make an album and post that.
Also, thanks for doing this.
__________________
I hope the 6th gen Camaro has a melodious horn trumpet. I'll tootel it at the ladies, yelling out "Hi hi." - RenegadeXR

كافر
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
железобетонное очко
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
There is an unequal amount of good and bad in most things, the trick is to work out the ratio and act accordingly.
Curr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:58 AM   #28
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Not really sure if its a 2SS? The interior shot might be of a 2SS (can't remember since the picture went away) but do we know for sure if the car the tested is?
No.. This was a 1SS. I'm just stating that even a 2SS has a weight advantage over the GT PP Premium.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.