Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2017, 06:52 AM   #29
JT58

 
Drives: Former 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 760
I had a 2011 2SS 6 speed manual- a fantastic car for a once or twice a week- the MPG was 12-19 depending how you drove it- and it required premium fuel. It was not a good every day driver. The gen 6 SS's may be better on fuel. I was looking for a better every day driver that I can use in retirement and I opted for a 2LT V6 RS. It was between the I4 and V6 for me too- the deciding factor- the V6 takes regular 87 octane and does not require premium. I4 and V8 require premium. I think the MPG and performance between the V6 and I4 is similar although I did not test drive the I4. The I4 may do slightly better- my WRX with turbo 4 averages 33 MPG but it is a completely different car. Regular gas is about .40 cheaper per gallon and every penny counts when on a budget or near retirement. So far I am averaging about 24 MPG in mine and I have the A8.
__________________
2006 C6 Corvette Manual, 2019 Silverado, 1997 Jeep Wrangler
JT58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 08:31 AM   #30
Rustydaytons
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Chevy
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Rosharon
Posts: 222
Would buy neither
Rustydaytons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 09:04 AM   #31
Risky Justice
 
Risky Justice's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
I would get the 2.0T over the V6. The power is really close and the 4 cylinder has more torque. If you want to do some modding, the 2.0T will respond much better to those mods.
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock)
Risky Justice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 11:19 AM   #32
soloknight6
SoCal HT5! SD
 
soloknight6's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 red hot 2ss M6
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego CA,
Posts: 1,929
I'd get the turbo 4 if I were you. Being your first camaro, you're gonna want to mod the crap out of it, and the 4 banger has more of an aftermarket.
__________________
soloknight6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 12:25 PM   #33
Waxmerchant
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro RS
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8
Howdy. I own a 2017 I4 and I can say it's awesome to drive. The reason I chose the I4 was due to my love of driving back roads in South Georgia. It feels super light and gives you confidence when you hit the twisty roads. Sure it does not have the growl of the NPP on a V6/V8, you can still get some great sounds out of it. And of course the turbo sound is a treat. When you step on the gas you do not hear the growl as the engine revs up, what you do get is a blink of the eye you're blasting down the road way faster than you thought. I've included a youtube clip of me doing a cold start so you can get an idea of the sound.

Waxmerchant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 01:25 PM   #34
Hot2016Red
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Hudsonville, MI
Posts: 34
My vote goes to the V6. I had a 2016 RS 2lt. It did not have NPP. The car was fantastic. I loved it, but a 2016 2SS with less than 2000 miles popped up and I bought. $45,000 car for $33,500 plus tax. Could not resist. I love this car as well. Now, having owned both of these, I can’t say enough good things about the V6. The RS handled as good as any car I have ever owned (and I’ve owner 6 corvettes, too many other cars to list). Great automobile for driving. In fact the RS would make a great daily driver since it runs on regular gas, tires are not just summer tires, and drops from 6 to 4 cylinders. Engineered very well. Your decision, but the V6 is really nice. By the way, last October bought it new for $27,000 plus tax. Was a yellow tag or red tag or whatever and GM knocked 20% off and the dealer threw another 5% off. Couldn’t resist that deal either. No regrets whatsoever.
Hot2016Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 02:02 PM   #35
Cameron27
 
Drives: 2015 2SS
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 349
.

Last edited by Cameron27; 06-06-2019 at 10:14 PM.
Cameron27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 02:20 PM   #36
Risky Justice
 
Risky Justice's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron27 View Post
*Higher peak torque

What matters is the torque curve: where the torque is at each rpm. If you get 100 torque up to 5000 rpm, then 300 at 5100, it’s pointless to say “higher torque”. That’s essentially what the hp and torque ratings are: highest numbers, not 100% representative of actual performance.

The 4 cylinder turbo hits 80%+ torque later than the v6, it hits peak torque sooner, and then it’s torque dips off after about 4500 rpm or so (I forget exact numbers). The v6 hits 80%+ torque near 2100rpm, and torque holds high throughout the range to redline.

Obviously there’s tuning that can be done on the turbo to essentially get a better 0-60.

My opinion is the v6 is the better option. Better stock performance, better torque curve, better sound, used regular gas not premium (isn’t crippled in performance by using regular). The i4 turbo uses premium, and if tuned it guzzles gas hard.

Still two great choices. I just see $1600 as a no brainer. I eeking out a 5% edge were the reason to tune an i4 turbo, I’d probably just save for a v8 instead.
Why do you people keep bringing up regular vs. premium gas like it really matters? Even if you get 20 gallons of gas, the price difference is only $6.40 when comparing prices of $2.37 for regular and $2.69 for premium.

As for the torque curve, I doubt it is as pronounced as you imply. I've driven cars with the 2.0T in it, and it seemed like it had pretty decent low end torque. I do know that for $350 (conservative tune) the 2.0T will make 300RWHP/330RWTQ.
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock)
Risky Justice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 06:56 PM   #37
Cgocifer

 
Cgocifer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 1SS 1LE, 2015 RAM Ecodiesel
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,451
Used SS!!
Cgocifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 06:58 PM   #38
Skerj
 
Drives: 2016 Ram 1500 Outdoorsman
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risky Justice View Post
Why do you people keep bringing up regular vs. premium gas like it really matters? Even if you get 20 gallons of gas, the price difference is only $6.40 when comparing prices of $2.37 for regular and $2.69 for premium.
Depends on where you are. I'm paying 2.80ish a gallon for regular and over 3.10 for 89 for my truck. I haven't checked lately but I bet it's at least 3.30 for premium, which is $12 for your 20 gallon number. For someone who drives a lot the difference in cost for the V6 could pay off rather quickly.

To the OP, ideally I'd like an SS. V8 and MRC for the win. But between the 2 smaller engines, without a test drive I'd say V6 all day; exhaust note is so much better. But I plan to test all 3.
__________________
Past - 2002 Camaro Z28
Present - 2016 Ram 1500 Outdoorsman
Future - 6th Gen Camaro SS
Skerj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 07:02 PM   #39
enzia35


 
Drives: '16 Garnet Red 1SS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 3,450
Yeah fellas, this thread is almost 2 years old.
__________________
'16 Camaro 1SS
'18 Miata GT
Gone: '01 Camaro, '14 Camaro, '90 Miata
enzia35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 08:14 PM   #40
rburke76
 
Drives: garnet red
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: northeast
Posts: 169
4 cylinder turbo guy here...

was on the fence between last year between I/4 and V6....both are great! There are pluses and minuses in every decision...I tested them both. I went for the I/4 Turbo....Runs great, over 30+ mpg....Price was under 27,000 out the door with a trade in that my trade was an old ugly monte carlo...I have had the car for over a year with no problems. Runs great! I say if this is your first muscle/sport car, or first Camaro go with what your gut tells you...I chose the 4cyl because of price, mpg, 275hp is plenty for me, and it suits my needs. I will not race or mod this car...If I had the 335hp 6cyl or 455 8cyl the temptation to race it or take it to the track might drive me crazy...
Attached Images
 
rburke76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 08:41 PM   #41
LuvMI
Lovin the growl...
 
LuvMI's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Rogers, Arkansas
Posts: 926
Not having the choice may do the same thing.
LuvMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 09:27 PM   #42
PersonX51
 
PersonX51's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Idaho
Posts: 34
I owned a 2012 1LT v6 auto trans. Great car I put 100000 miles on it then traded it for a 2017 2SS A8. I never had a single issue with the v6, ran great, got good gas mileage. Never threw a code even with an Overkill tune in it.
One advantage with the I4 or the V6 is you don't have to be able to afford Y speed rated tires. Also the tire sizes are usually the same front and rear and can be rotated.
Now for the 6th gen LT1 V8 .. it ain't the same animal as the old LS engines. on road trips I get between 30 and 36 mpg. Around town I get between 20 and 24 mpg. and the big plus is it has 455hp when you want it. but it has very expensive tires that are not winter rated and can't be rotated. So mine will spend the winter in the garage under a car cover while I drive the Subaru in the snow...
PersonX51 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.