10-14-2017, 06:52 AM | #29 |
Drives: Former 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 760
|
I had a 2011 2SS 6 speed manual- a fantastic car for a once or twice a week- the MPG was 12-19 depending how you drove it- and it required premium fuel. It was not a good every day driver. The gen 6 SS's may be better on fuel. I was looking for a better every day driver that I can use in retirement and I opted for a 2LT V6 RS. It was between the I4 and V6 for me too- the deciding factor- the V6 takes regular 87 octane and does not require premium. I4 and V8 require premium. I think the MPG and performance between the V6 and I4 is similar although I did not test drive the I4. The I4 may do slightly better- my WRX with turbo 4 averages 33 MPG but it is a completely different car. Regular gas is about .40 cheaper per gallon and every penny counts when on a budget or near retirement. So far I am averaging about 24 MPG in mine and I have the A8.
__________________
2006 C6 Corvette Manual, 2019 Silverado, 1997 Jeep Wrangler
|
10-14-2017, 08:31 AM | #30 |
Account Suspended
Drives: Chevy Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Rosharon
Posts: 222
|
Would buy neither
|
10-14-2017, 09:04 AM | #31 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
I would get the 2.0T over the V6. The power is really close and the 4 cylinder has more torque. If you want to do some modding, the 2.0T will respond much better to those mods.
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
10-14-2017, 11:19 AM | #32 |
SoCal HT5! SD
Drives: 2016 red hot 2ss M6 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego CA,
Posts: 1,929
|
I'd get the turbo 4 if I were you. Being your first camaro, you're gonna want to mod the crap out of it, and the 4 banger has more of an aftermarket.
__________________
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...37#post5437037
By my deeds, I honor him. V8!!! |
10-14-2017, 12:25 PM | #33 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro RS Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8
|
Howdy. I own a 2017 I4 and I can say it's awesome to drive. The reason I chose the I4 was due to my love of driving back roads in South Georgia. It feels super light and gives you confidence when you hit the twisty roads. Sure it does not have the growl of the NPP on a V6/V8, you can still get some great sounds out of it. And of course the turbo sound is a treat. When you step on the gas you do not hear the growl as the engine revs up, what you do get is a blink of the eye you're blasting down the road way faster than you thought. I've included a youtube clip of me doing a cold start so you can get an idea of the sound.
|
|
10-14-2017, 01:25 PM | #34 |
My vote goes to the V6. I had a 2016 RS 2lt. It did not have NPP. The car was fantastic. I loved it, but a 2016 2SS with less than 2000 miles popped up and I bought. $45,000 car for $33,500 plus tax. Could not resist. I love this car as well. Now, having owned both of these, I can’t say enough good things about the V6. The RS handled as good as any car I have ever owned (and I’ve owner 6 corvettes, too many other cars to list). Great automobile for driving. In fact the RS would make a great daily driver since it runs on regular gas, tires are not just summer tires, and drops from 6 to 4 cylinders. Engineered very well. Your decision, but the V6 is really nice. By the way, last October bought it new for $27,000 plus tax. Was a yellow tag or red tag or whatever and GM knocked 20% off and the dealer threw another 5% off. Couldn’t resist that deal either. No regrets whatsoever.
|
|
10-14-2017, 02:02 PM | #35 |
Drives: 2015 2SS Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 349
|
.
Last edited by Cameron27; 06-06-2019 at 10:14 PM. |
10-14-2017, 02:20 PM | #36 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
As for the torque curve, I doubt it is as pronounced as you imply. I've driven cars with the 2.0T in it, and it seemed like it had pretty decent low end torque. I do know that for $350 (conservative tune) the 2.0T will make 300RWHP/330RWTQ.
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
|
10-14-2017, 06:56 PM | #37 |
Drives: 2018 1SS 1LE, 2015 RAM Ecodiesel Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,451
|
Used SS!!
|
10-14-2017, 06:58 PM | #38 | |
Drives: 2016 Ram 1500 Outdoorsman Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
To the OP, ideally I'd like an SS. V8 and MRC for the win. But between the 2 smaller engines, without a test drive I'd say V6 all day; exhaust note is so much better. But I plan to test all 3.
__________________
Past - 2002 Camaro Z28
Present - 2016 Ram 1500 Outdoorsman Future - 6th Gen Camaro SS |
|
10-14-2017, 07:02 PM | #39 |
Drives: '16 Garnet Red 1SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 3,450
|
Yeah fellas, this thread is almost 2 years old.
__________________
'16 Camaro 1SS
'18 Miata GT Gone: '01 Camaro, '14 Camaro, '90 Miata |
10-14-2017, 08:14 PM | #40 |
Drives: garnet red Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: northeast
Posts: 169
|
4 cylinder turbo guy here...
was on the fence between last year between I/4 and V6....both are great! There are pluses and minuses in every decision...I tested them both. I went for the I/4 Turbo....Runs great, over 30+ mpg....Price was under 27,000 out the door with a trade in that my trade was an old ugly monte carlo...I have had the car for over a year with no problems. Runs great! I say if this is your first muscle/sport car, or first Camaro go with what your gut tells you...I chose the 4cyl because of price, mpg, 275hp is plenty for me, and it suits my needs. I will not race or mod this car...If I had the 335hp 6cyl or 455 8cyl the temptation to race it or take it to the track might drive me crazy...
|
10-14-2017, 08:41 PM | #41 |
Lovin the growl...
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Rogers, Arkansas
Posts: 926
|
Not having the choice may do the same thing.
|
10-14-2017, 09:27 PM | #42 |
Drives: 2017 SS Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Idaho
Posts: 34
|
I owned a 2012 1LT v6 auto trans. Great car I put 100000 miles on it then traded it for a 2017 2SS A8. I never had a single issue with the v6, ran great, got good gas mileage. Never threw a code even with an Overkill tune in it.
One advantage with the I4 or the V6 is you don't have to be able to afford Y speed rated tires. Also the tire sizes are usually the same front and rear and can be rotated. Now for the 6th gen LT1 V8 .. it ain't the same animal as the old LS engines. on road trips I get between 30 and 36 mpg. Around town I get between 20 and 24 mpg. and the big plus is it has 455hp when you want it. but it has very expensive tires that are not winter rated and can't be rotated. So mine will spend the winter in the garage under a car cover while I drive the Subaru in the snow... |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|