Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2017, 09:18 AM   #15
xc_SS/RS


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: somewhere in MD
Posts: 4,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS 1LE View Post
It pretty much will have too...
Didn't the outgoing model have 640 hp? What's 7 more on top of that? Lol
__________________
2010 2SS/RS
Z/28 intake, NW, FAST 102, speed engineering LT's, some exhaust, ATI -10% pulley, GM flex fuel injectors, DSX flex fuel sensor, MGW shifter, HP Tuners, some suspension work, stickers and a little weight loss. 12.63 @113.53
xc_SS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 09:24 AM   #16
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by xc_SS/RS View Post
Didn't the outgoing model have 640 hp? What's 7 more on top of that? Lol
662..
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 09:27 AM   #17
crysalis_01
Iron fist, lead foot
 
crysalis_01's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,228
The math says 3054lbs "dry".
The 3.5EB weight 417lbs "dry" and 450lbs dressed.
Ford Performance director Dave Pericak states that adding vital fluids, minus fuel, brings the GT's weight up to 3173 lbs.
It carries a 15.2 gallon fuel tank, gasoline weight 6lbs per gallon, when full that would add 91.2lbs.
"Total" curb weight comes to 3264.2lbs.
However US curb weights are typically given when the vehicle is measured at "nominal" fuel levels, so measured as 1/2 capacity that brings us to 3218.6lbs.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars...ght-top-speed/
__________________
'03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 || modded with mods'n'stuff
crysalis_01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 09:38 AM   #18
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
Did the math last night.. Weighs almost 300 pounds more than McLaren.

US curb weights are with a a full tank of gas.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 09:46 AM   #19
khell86
 
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
Yeah but its faster than a 675LT and a Ferrari 458 Speciale around their test rack.

Edit: Ford is also saying the 675LT was only 90 lbs lighter dry, when weighed on the same scales at the same time.

http://www.autoblog.com/2017/01/25/f...mclaren-675lt/
khell86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 09:52 AM   #20
xc_SS/RS


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: somewhere in MD
Posts: 4,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy View Post
662..
So they really won't care about going over the GT power level lol

The car looks good, I can't stand how the racecar sounds though so hopefully the road car sounds better.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS
Z/28 intake, NW, FAST 102, speed engineering LT's, some exhaust, ATI -10% pulley, GM flex fuel injectors, DSX flex fuel sensor, MGW shifter, HP Tuners, some suspension work, stickers and a little weight loss. 12.63 @113.53
xc_SS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 10:00 AM   #21
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
Yeah but its faster than a 675LT and a Ferrari 458 Speciale around their test rack.

Edit: Ford is also saying the 675LT was only 90 lbs lighter dry, when weighed on the same scales at the same time.

http://www.autoblog.com/2017/01/25/f...mclaren-675lt/
Based on that, Both with fluids but without fuel, the McLaren is almost 200 pounds lighter..

They also benchmarked cars that were already out and did the test themselves... Lol.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 10:02 AM   #22
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
Yeah but its faster than a McLaren 675LT and a Ferrari 458 Speciale around their test track...
So a last gen Ferrari? The "regular" 488 GTB is quicker than the 458 Speciale on track, and the track focused version of that is due out next year. Not impressed...
__________________
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 10:38 AM   #23
crysalis_01
Iron fist, lead foot
 
crysalis_01's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS 1LE View Post
So a last gen Ferrari? The "regular" 488 GTB is quicker than the 458 Speciale on track, and the track focused version of that is due out next year. Not impressed...
You do realize that when the 488 was released (March 2015 in Geneva), GT had already been quite the way along its development track (debuting in January 2015 in Detroit).

I know, Ford, those fools, not using the time machine we all know they have to baseline a car that debuted 2 months after theirs.

How dare they baseline a supercar that was current and available at the time.
__________________
'03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 || modded with mods'n'stuff
crysalis_01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 11:02 AM   #24
khell86
 
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
It bested the Ferrari by 3 seconds. Man this thread got salty fast.
khell86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 11:12 AM   #25
polizzio
 
polizzio's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 1LT SIM Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 375
At the end of the day it's still a Ford....and a Ford that costs $400,000.

Purchase a new 2017 Corvette Z06 and add the Hennessey HPE 800 package with a 24 month warranty for another $17,000. Then invest the remaining $280,000.

Or purchase another new Z06 for the wife and still have $180,000+ left over
polizzio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 11:16 AM   #26
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
It bested the Ferrari by 3 seconds. Man this thread got salty fast.
Anything is salty to you if it's about Ford and if it's somewhat negative.

Based on numbers, it's another overhyped Ford product. Add it to the list along with the Focus RS and Mustang.. I do like how all of the cars look at least.. The Ford GT is absolutely gorgeous. They just seem to talk about how it will perform, how much it'll weigh, etc. etc., then they don't seem to hit those targets.

You can add the F150 to the list as well probably. While I like my truck, the aluminum thing was overhyped. Look at the tests. It barely weighs any less than the Silverado.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 11:29 AM   #27
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy View Post
Nice contribution.

Not impressed. Ford once again promised something they didn't deliver. (Weight) Maybe next time they'll just keep their mouth shut as some of the engineers should have with the Mustang.
It's the fastest production Ford they have ever made. Pretty sure that should amount to something. It's set a new bar for Ford. That's the whole point.

I'm beginning to think your expectations of this car were way over the top. You were clearly expecting a brute force axe murderer of a car. Nothing that i ever read on this car gave me that impression.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 11:37 AM   #28
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by crysalis_01 View Post
You do realize that when the 488 was released (March 2015 in Geneva), GT had already been quite the way along its development track (debuting in January 2015 in Detroit).

I know, Ford, those fools, not using the time machine we all know they have to baseline a car that debuted 2 months after theirs.

How dare they baseline a supercar that was current and available at the time.
You don't need a time machine.

Take the first generation of the competitors model you're benchmarking against and lay out its specs. Then do the same thing for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. Take those data points and make a trend line to predict what the next generation is probably going to be like.

Repeat with other competitors to get a more reliable picture of where the segment is heading.

It won't be exact, but it will give you an extremely good target. Much better than assuming that nothing will ever be better than whats currently available.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.