Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2015, 05:19 PM   #169
Sledgehammer70
Lethal Camaro
 
Sledgehammer70's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by obzidian View Post
Again, of course it does if there target is lower than a current engine option.

It doesn't make sense to me!! I want a Zl1 to yield 750hp++ and crush everything!

But I/we don't have that kind of sway.
But a ZL1 will never be that. Now a Z/28 on the other hand.
Sledgehammer70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:21 PM   #170
Sledgehammer70
Lethal Camaro
 
Sledgehammer70's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanSS24 View Post
Couldn't tell if the brakes were carbon ceramics or not. If it's not, it's gotta most likely be the ZL1.
They could be testing brake options.
Sledgehammer70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:25 PM   #171
Z28sr2fast4yall
 
Z28sr2fast4yall's Avatar
 
Drives: 83z,86z,90rs,91rs,92rs,94z,95rs,95z
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Nc
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorCamaro View Post
Wait, what? The GT350 is supposedly in line with a C7 Z51 and a GT350R is a bit fast than a 5th gen. Z/28. I full anticipate a GT350R to hand the Z/28 its ass too.
Key term... "Supposedly"... Except, the gt350r-c lost its debut, to not 1 z28r, but 5.... The gt350's fastest time, they claim, is still slower than the z28's claimed fastest time. The difference is Chevy does official numbers, videos, stats, etc... The z28 posted a lot faster times, but it wasn't recorded so they didn't count it. Ford, doesn't care... They claim it with no proof... Camaro wins all day... And that's the 6 gen mustang vs the 5 gen camaro... The 6 gen camaro will dominate the 6 gen mustang... No sweat
__________________
Z28sr2fast4yall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:28 PM   #172
obzidian
 
obzidian's Avatar
 
Drives: 98 camaro turbo
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledgehammer70 View Post
But a ZL1 will never be that. Now a Z/28 on the other hand.
Why not??? I can name three reasons why it "should be", in my eyes:

1. Hellcat 707hp

2. GT500 700hp+

3. AMERICA!
__________________
.....
obzidian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:29 PM   #173
Autonaut
 
Drives: El camino
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: World
Posts: 193
I'll take a guess.

It's the new z28 (based on hpsix tag)
ZL1 and Z28 are about to be the same (based on what happened to the vette)
Pwr 6.54 means it is somewhere around 600 horsepower and the engine will be named something other than LT4 (because it wont be an LT4 much like the LSA was not an LS9)

The only thing that would suprise me would be for them to develop a lighter SS and a more powerful higher revving n/a engine.

Either options will be sweet. I believe GM has proved to us they know what they're doing with the performance division and will do anything they can within the division to keep us happy..
Autonaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:38 PM   #174
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by obzidian View Post
Ok..... but what if they want one for only 550hp???


When has the General limited themselves to only two v8 options at one given point.

In 2011 you had the l99, ls3, lsa, ls9, ls7 and all of the vortec derivatives. All engines that fit their target hp for a specific vehicle goals/performance category.

Let's not forget that the LTx's are fairly new so the fact that we may have more engines in development unknown to us (454ci LT8/L88 ??) is very real.

The L99 is no longer needed because the LT1 already had AFM. The LSA is no longer needed because the LT4 is cheaper than the LS9. The LS7 is not being replaced because they couldn't meet the Z06 power goals with a naturally aspirated engine.

I'm talking about LTx engines. The EcoTec3 engines are different.

They may be developing more LTx engines but I would be very surprised, unless a Grand Sport is being worked on.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:38 PM   #175
obzidian
 
obzidian's Avatar
 
Drives: 98 camaro turbo
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z28sr2fast4yall View Post
Key term... "Supposedly"... Except, the gt350r-c lost its debut, to not 1 z28r, but 5.... The gt350's fastest time, they claim, is still slower than the z28's claimed fastest time. The difference is Chevy does official numbers, videos, stats, etc... The z28 posted a lot faster times, but it wasn't recorded so they didn't count it. Ford, doesn't care... They claim it with no proof... Camaro wins all day... And that's the 6 gen mustang vs the 5 gen camaro... The 6 gen camaro will dominate the 6 gen mustang... No sweat
Are we talking about "ring times?"

Is the "unofficial time" the one posted on Horsepower Kings???
__________________
.....
obzidian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:42 PM   #176
Z28sr2fast4yall
 
Z28sr2fast4yall's Avatar
 
Drives: 83z,86z,90rs,91rs,92rs,94z,95rs,95z
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Nc
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by obzidian View Post
Gotcha!!


What was that time?? What are they saying??
They claim... It is 7:32.19... Perfect conditions

Z28 ran 7:37.47... That's was in the rain, on the track with rain all week.

But!! Chevy has stated the z28 ran a consistent 7:31, in perfect conditions... But they had already released their time, and didn't care to re do it...

And I just read, ford has not claimed that number... They've actually had no word on an official time yet.
__________________
Z28sr2fast4yall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:46 PM   #177
KaBoom1701
KaBoom1701
 
KaBoom1701's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z28sr2fast4yall View Post
They claim... It is 7:32.19... Perfect conditions

Z28 ran 7:37.47... That's was in the rain, on the track with rain all week.

But!! Chevy has stated the z28 ran a consistent 7:31, in perfect conditions... But they had already released their time, and didn't care to re do it...

And I just read, ford has not claimed that number... They've actually had no word on an official time yet.
I like the ZL1 in your signature.
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats.
KaBoom1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:46 PM   #178
oklapike
 
oklapike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary SS Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
The L99 is no longer needed because the LT1 already had AFM. The LSA is no longer needed because the LT4 is cheaper than the LS9. The LS7 is not being replaced because they couldn't meet the Z06 power goals with a naturally aspirated engine.

I'm talking about LTx engines. The EcoTec3 engines are different.

They may be developing more LTx engines but I would be very surprised, unless a Grand Sport is being worked on.
IIRC, the only thing that GM has said regarding the Gen V engines is that the only displacements would be 5.3 and 6.2.
oklapike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:49 PM   #179
DanSS24

 
DanSS24's Avatar
 
Drives: Dream Cars in my head
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 808
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tran View Post
Updated with on track photos!



Based on this photo, it does not look like a square tire set-up. So I really believe this is more a ZL1 than a Z/28. Plus I also think that Chevy will not use that rear spoiler for the Z/28, and go similar to the C7 Z06 vette. Just my .02 cents.
__________________

Wishful thinking...but I sure can dream big.
DanSS24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 05:57 PM   #180
obzidian
 
obzidian's Avatar
 
Drives: 98 camaro turbo
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
The L99 is no longer needed because the LT1 already had AFM. The LSA is no longer needed because the LT4 is cheaper than the LS9. The LS7 is not being replaced because they couldn't meet the Z06 power goals with a naturally aspirated engine.

I'm talking about LTx engines. The EcoTec3 engines are different.

They may be developing more LTx engines but I would be very surprised, unless a Grand Sport is being worked on.

__________________
.....
obzidian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 06:00 PM   #181
RLHMARINES
1st Civ. Div.
 
RLHMARINES's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,726
That pic angle is deceiving and not one to use for a good comparison plus that spoiler is wider with a higher rear pitch than the one from the regular Camaro SS spoiler.
__________________
Swift....Silent....Deadly
RLHMARINES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2015, 06:00 PM   #182
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by obzidian View Post
Are we talking about "ring times?"

Is the "unofficial time" the one posted on Horsepower Kings???
He went off about the GT350R-C as used by the Multimatic team in the CTSCC. He then failed to mention the GT350R-C kicking the crap out of the Z/28.R's in the two races that followed.

Ford doesn't release ring times so he's also saying that means GM wins.

Basically it was a worthless post
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.