Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2016, 11:55 AM   #1
coolhand
 
Drives: 911, Cayenne, A6
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 3
A8 vs ZF 8 ??

How does A8 compare to the widely used ZF 8 transmission found in many BMWs and Audis?

I understand A8 is no PDK, but is it comparable to ZF8 in manual paddle shifting mode?
coolhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 12:20 PM   #2
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
There's a lot of variants of the ZF8 ... you'll have to be a bit more specific.

The 8L90 matches if not exceeds the performance of pdk transmissions in most cars. There have been a number of tests major publications have made comparing the 8L90 to various pdk transmissions and it's not missing out at all.

Depending on which variant of the Zf8 you're referring to, you might be able to find a direct comparison since the A8 8L90 has been in use in the vette since last year I believe.

I think motortrend and car and driver have done tests on the A8 in the various modes.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 01:26 PM   #3
mt3130

 
Drives: Coupeless :(
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SWFL
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
There's a lot of variants of the ZF8 ... you'll have to be a bit more specific.

The 8L90 matches if not exceeds the performance of pdk transmissions in most cars. There have been a number of tests major publications have made comparing the 8L90 to various pdk transmissions and it's not missing out at all.

Depending on which variant of the Zf8 you're referring to, you might be able to find a direct comparison since the A8 8L90 has been in use in the vette since last year I believe.

I think motortrend and car and driver have done tests on the A8 in the various modes.
The PDK is specific to Porsche, and GM's 8 speed doesn't hold a candle to it. They (GM) advertised that it was faster than the Porsche unit, but real world testing shows that GM still has a ways to go in terms of transmission downshift times as well as paddle responsiveness for both upshifts and downshifts.

The 10 speed is more promising in that the torque converter doesn't have to unlock to change gears. If the paddle shifters work properly, then the 10 speed is probably the unit to compare to the PDK.
mt3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 01:52 PM   #4
LSxWittles
 
LSxWittles's Avatar
 
Drives: Stuff and Things
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: United States
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt3130 View Post
The PDK is specific to Porsche, and GM's 8 speed doesn't hold a candle to it. They (GM) advertised that it was faster than the Porsche unit, but real world testing shows that GM still has a ways to go in terms of transmission downshift times as well as paddle responsiveness for both upshifts and downshifts.

The 10 speed is more promising in that the torque converter doesn't have to unlock to change gears. If the paddle shifters work properly, then the 10 speed is probably the unit to compare to the PDK.

This. Although I haven't driven the A8, everything I have seen shows clearly noticeable lag and responsiveness through the paddles unfortunately. Only driven one vehicle with a ZF 8 speed (buddies scat pack) and it seemed to respond from the paddles pretty well. I should go test drive an A8 6th gen lol.
LSxWittles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 02:05 PM   #5
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
This post seems to break it down better than can be hoped for in here or referencing marketing materials from 2 years ago.

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?p=9095693
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 04:11 PM   #6
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Yep just to be clear, the paddle delay is a programming issue...not hardware. And the paddles are were lag is present. In AUTO mode, mine compares exactly to the ZF 8 that was in my 328i. The paddles were definitely faster on the ZF 8.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 09:09 PM   #7
Sp00ner
 
Sp00ner's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSxWittles View Post
This. Although I haven't driven the A8, everything I have seen shows clearly noticeable lag and responsiveness through the paddles unfortunately. Only driven one vehicle with a ZF 8 speed (buddies scat pack) and it seemed to respond from the paddles pretty well. I should go test drive an A8 6th gen lol.
Seems to be a difference in shift speed between modes as well. TR vs all others, in particular. Could be in my head though.

The 1-2 upshift is the only one I'd say has 'lag', although thus far I see no reason to launch in anything but D, and 2-3/2-3 shift seem to fire off immediately. I don't have any direct euro brand experience to compare it with though.

Coming from a manual 5th Gen (and manuals in general for the last 15+ years), I was pretty shocked and how well it drove itself in both Manual Mode and Performance Shifting Mode (I think that's the name). Honestly, when it goes into the Perf Shifting mode, I love it, just sits the powerband and shifts up/down as needed but I keep reaching for the shifter out of habit.

Disclaimer: Have not been to the track yet, car is barely past break in, we'll see how I feel about the 'auto' after a day on the course.
Sp00ner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 09:46 PM   #8
coolhand
 
Drives: 911, Cayenne, A6
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
Yep just to be clear, the paddle delay is a programming issue...not hardware. And the paddles are were lag is present. In AUTO mode, mine compares exactly to the ZF 8 that was in my 328i. The paddles were definitely faster on the ZF 8.
Are you saying that shifting in manual mode with the *gear lever* does not have lag?

Or do you mean that in all the manual M modes, including paddle and gear lever shifts have lags, and only in auto D mode, it's just as fast and smooth as ZF?

If it's laggy on all kinds of manual shifting, whether paddle or gear lever, than it's not just a programming issue; it's the actual performance and limitation of A8.
coolhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 10:14 PM   #9
cleoent

 
cleoent's Avatar
 
Drives: 16' Camaro E-Force SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Morgan Hill, Ca
Posts: 836
Paddle shifter respoveniss and shift speed are two different things. The 8a in the ss shifts ridiculously fast. Faster than the smg 3 in my old m5. As fast as dual clutches.

It however responds to the paddles a bit slower.
cleoent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2016, 11:08 PM   #10
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand View Post
Are you saying that shifting in manual mode with the *gear lever* does not have lag?

Or do you mean that in all the manual M modes, including paddle and gear lever shifts have lags, and only in auto D mode, it's just as fast and smooth as ZF?

If it's laggy on all kinds of manual shifting, whether paddle or gear lever, than it's not just a programming issue; it's the actual performance and limitation of A8.
Paddles and the console shifter are both electronic and have lag. The problem is they are not directly executing a shift. They are requesting the computer to shift. This is where the programming comes in. GM left the computer with too much to control. This is one of the main changes with the A10. They added what they call a DSC (direct shift controller) which gives the driver full control and bypass the nannies.

The guy above is right. There's shift speed and paddle response...two different things. If it was a limitation of the trans itself, it would not perform like it does in auto. The ZF and the 8L90 share a similar design, but with very different takes on programing and control. Lag is present on ZF units as well, just not as bad as the 8L90.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2016, 12:39 PM   #11
LSxWittles
 
LSxWittles's Avatar
 
Drives: Stuff and Things
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: United States
Posts: 257
Is there a way to tune the response time for the paddles? Apologies if it's a dumb question but I don't have much experience with these new auto's and paddle shifters (have owned nothing but manual performance vehicles). Just curious.
LSxWittles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2016, 12:46 PM   #12
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSxWittles View Post
Is there a way to tune the response time for the paddles? Apologies if it's a dumb question but I don't have much experience with these new auto's and paddle shifters (have owned nothing but manual performance vehicles). Just curious.
I think I heard no one has really done any tuning with the 8L90s yet. So the answer is probably no for now at least.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2016, 12:52 PM   #13
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
I think I heard no one has really done any tuning with the 8L90s yet. So the answer is probably no for now at least.
Trifecta modifies the tcm with a new tune. Not sure if it affected the paddle shifters at all. I've yet to feel the urge to even try paddle shifting so I couldn't tell you if it got faster or not.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2016, 01:04 PM   #14
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt3130 View Post
The PDK is specific to Porsche, and GM's 8 speed doesn't hold a candle to it. They (GM) advertised that it was faster than the Porsche unit, but real world testing shows that GM still has a ways to go in terms of transmission downshift times as well as paddle responsiveness for both upshifts and downshifts.

The 10 speed is more promising in that the torque converter doesn't have to unlock to change gears. If the paddle shifters work properly, then the 10 speed is probably the unit to compare to the PDK.
Incorrect. I'm amazed how often I read this and people get it wrong. GM only said the 8 speed was faster in upshifts under WOT. (and I don't think this was even talking about paddle shifts either...just the transmission shifting)
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.