05-22-2015, 08:22 AM | #99 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
Quote:
Maybe "in the real world" the EB is trapping consistently better times than the 2011 -2014 V6, but I haven't been paying attention to that, so I'll take your word for it. I choose to compare the EB to the 11-14 V6 b/c it is faster than the new 2015 V6, and it SHOULD be compared in my opinion. The EB is supposed to be an optional performance option over the V6 (which it is) but in stock form doesn't seem to be running much quicker in the 1/4 than the older V6 PP model. The HP difference, and weight difference is negligible. TQ is the main difference, but in stock form the EB falls off somewhat in the higher rpms. The V6 keeps pulling.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
05-22-2015, 08:26 AM | #100 |
Drives: 2015 Mustang EB Performance Pack Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 50
|
No track apps since being tuned because I'm waiting to get an IRS bushing support kit (steeda or bmr) so I'm not hopping around. I ran 13.82 @ 102.8 with intake and catback when I took it to the track for the first time on the factory everything else
__________________
Guard 2015 Mustang Ecobeast Auto
Livernois stage 3 tune/160° T-stat Mishimoto Intake/Intercooler/Charge Pipes Ford Racing Catback |
05-22-2015, 08:28 AM | #101 | |
Drives: 2015 Mustang EB Performance Pack Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
__________________
Guard 2015 Mustang Ecobeast Auto
Livernois stage 3 tune/160° T-stat Mishimoto Intake/Intercooler/Charge Pipes Ford Racing Catback |
|
05-22-2015, 08:31 AM | #102 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
That could very well be it.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
05-22-2015, 08:35 AM | #103 |
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...al-test-review
Zero to 60 mph: 5.5 sec Zero to 100 mph: 13.3 sec Zero to 140 mph: 31.4 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.8 sec (Falls off hard with no built up boost) Standing ¼-mile: 13.9 sec @ 102 mph http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...al-test-review Zero to 60 mph: 5.7 sec Zero to 100 mph: 13.7 sec Zero to 130 mph: 25.4 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.6 sec Top gear, 30-50 mph: 10.3 sec Top gear, 50-70 mph: 7.8 sec Standing ¼-mile: 14.1 sec @ 101 mph Two cars are pretty close to one another in acceleration.. ATS is down on power, but it is lighter. Tested different days.. That's the best time I've seen for the Ecoboost from any publication, but it could be that there is a faster one that I haven't seen. |
05-22-2015, 08:45 AM | #104 |
Drives: 2015 Mustang EB Performance Pack Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 50
|
I'm not really sure what the point of the magazine racing is here. I'm also not sure why you are so bent on hating on the car. The link below has a dyno chart of the tune I'm running for a stock car. Mine is modified for the mods I have so I should be putting out a bit more. For the fact that I average 32mpg on the highway and 25 mixed this car is a beast
http://www.livernoismotorsports.com/...ost-Tuner.html
__________________
Guard 2015 Mustang Ecobeast Auto
Livernois stage 3 tune/160° T-stat Mishimoto Intake/Intercooler/Charge Pipes Ford Racing Catback |
05-22-2015, 08:47 AM | #105 | |
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
Quote:
I think the turbo 4 and v6 pony cars are damn good bang for the buck for under 30k. |
|
05-22-2015, 08:51 AM | #106 | |
Drives: 2015 Mustang EB Performance Pack Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
__________________
Guard 2015 Mustang Ecobeast Auto
Livernois stage 3 tune/160° T-stat Mishimoto Intake/Intercooler/Charge Pipes Ford Racing Catback |
|
05-22-2015, 09:08 AM | #107 |
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
It has 25 less torque and 35 less horsepower.. Mark Reuss said that the 0-60 will be well below 6 seconds on the 2.0.. He reiterated the "Well below" part and that it will surprise the friends across town. The car most likely will weigh over 100 pounds less than the Ecoboost. I'm going to say they'll be pretty even unless Ford boosts the 2.3 up a tad more.
|
05-22-2015, 10:01 AM | #108 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
It may very well be close to 100 lbs lighter.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
05-22-2015, 10:18 AM | #109 |
Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
|
I love that there are two Mustang owners arguing on a Camaro forum.
I think the two turbo 4 cylinder engines will be close. I'm sure the aftermarket is equally large between both. |
05-22-2015, 10:26 AM | #110 | |
Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa by way of Miami...
Posts: 4,934
|
Quote:
I tell them every once in a while in person though. Well my tail lights do... LoL Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk
__________________
My Build Thread... http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285054
|
|
05-22-2015, 10:51 AM | #111 | |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
Quote:
|
|
05-22-2015, 11:00 AM | #112 | |
Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa by way of Miami...
Posts: 4,934
|
Quote:
Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk
__________________
My Build Thread... http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285054
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|