Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2017, 08:46 AM   #365
ModernCamaroZ28Fan
LT1_Radenso
 
ModernCamaroZ28Fan's Avatar
 
Drives: a 2 spd water bottle
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In your trunk
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Chief View Post
I'm sure that render's in a very early state and the final product will be drastically improved but for now it brings to mind the 2018 Mustang refresh. That car looks like it like it was designed by an individual whose primary talent was being a personal friend of some corporate bigwig at Ford.


Dude, that comment was rude and I question if it is against the rules to offend someone. How dare you insult some who is only 5% finished of "modelling" requesting if he should contiune with some ford crap.
ModernCamaroZ28Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 08:51 AM   #366
ModernCamaroZ28Fan
LT1_Radenso
 
ModernCamaroZ28Fan's Avatar
 
Drives: a 2 spd water bottle
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In your trunk
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc7000 View Post
There were technical reasons that left the L99 engine at 400BHP, the AFM setup they were running limited camshaft design to more conservative setups. It also limited the red line of the engine, these things were improved for the generation V SBC as the LT1 engine in the Corvette is rated at 460/465 and pulls to 6,500/6,600rpms from the factory.
That was Chevy before they let the Camaro Team take off. We will see in January or March. I think they will bump up the horsepower, and give it better tires, and options as well as 1LE and ZL1 advantages. Not 2 sure about weight, maybe next generation.
ModernCamaroZ28Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 12:14 PM   #367
Cgocifer

 
Cgocifer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 1SS 1LE, 2015 RAM Ecodiesel
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernCamaroZ28Fan View Post


Dude, that comment was rude and I question if it is against the rules to offend someone. How dare you insult some who is only 5% finished of "modelling" requesting if he should contiune with some ford crap.
Slight overreaction... lol
Cgocifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 12:43 PM   #368
gringo
Account Suspended
 
gringo's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro V6
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc7000 View Post
There were technical reasons that left the L99 engine at 400BHP, the AFM setup they were running limited camshaft design to more conservative setups. It also limited the red line of the engine, these things were improved for the generation V SBC as the LT1 engine in the Corvette is rated at 460/465 and pulls to 6,500/6,600rpms from the factory.
The real reasons were probably emissions and CAFE. The L99 was detuned for the LS3 which was the hot power setup on the 5th gen. So, they restricted it by offering it with only the manual transmission sans AFM or VVT.

With the new direct injected LT1, no compromise engine options were needed. The cam and VVT could be optimized for maximum power. The new AFM setup along with the 8sp auto brought MPG targets up where they needed to be without sacrificing HP.
gringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 04:53 PM   #369
doc7000

 
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by gringo View Post
The real reasons were probably emissions and CAFE. The L99 was detuned for the LS3 which was the hot power setup on the 5th gen. So, they restricted it by offering it with only the manual transmission sans AFM or VVT.

With the new direct injected LT1, no compromise engine options were needed. The cam and VVT could be optimized for maximum power. The new AFM setup along with the 8sp auto brought MPG targets up where they needed to be without sacrificing HP.
No, there was an article about the L99 and it was talked about that the limiting factor was the AFM system at the time had limits cams as well as rpms.

http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...an-l99-camaro/

Here is one reference from one article about the AFM lifters on the L99.

"Unlike a "typical" LS3 cam swap, the VVT camshaft system requires builders to remove the factory Active Fuel Management (AFM) lifters. These lifters just can't handle the lift of an aggressive camshaft, and must be swapped for a set of Comp Cams supplied hydraulic roller units. This means the cylinder heads have to come off"

The AFM system on the L99 used lifters that couldn't handle more aggressive camshafts and also limited rpms further so this limited the horsepower rating and rpm range of the L99 engine compared to the LS3.

Last edited by doc7000; 11-29-2017 at 05:07 PM.
doc7000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 05:00 PM   #370
Subcool
 
Drives: 2022 SS 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: michigan
Posts: 178
I seriously doubt Chevy will bump camaro h.p. Without bumping the base corvette first.
Subcool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 09:06 PM   #371
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,637
Old AFM is history.

Look for the LT2 with more power (near 500hp) and new skip-fire AFM along with new lifters and other valvetrain hardware.

Possibly in the 2019 Camaro SS (we'll know soon), definitely in the 2020 Corvette (C8)

i
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge

General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer

STANDARD DISCLAIMER
camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever,
whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free.
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 10:35 PM   #372
Cgocifer

 
Cgocifer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 1SS 1LE, 2015 RAM Ecodiesel
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro5 View Post
Old AFM is history.

Look for the LT2 with more power (near 500hp) and new skip-fire AFM along with new lifters and other valvetrain hardware.

Possibly in the 2019 Camaro SS (we'll know soon), definitely in the 2020 Corvette (C8)


i
Interesting
Cgocifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 10:55 PM   #373
JaxChris

 
Drives: '16 2SS GD1 MX0 NPP F55 IO6
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,298
I am curious how they would apply this dynamic deactivation to performance applications. Too many are annoyed by AFM drone now, but this new method would cause an uneven drone that will make it even more pronounced. Otherwise, it looks like a good system that could even be used to keep a cylinder deactivated when the ECU detects a single cylinder issue.
JaxChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 07:55 AM   #374
Martinjlm
Retired from GM
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernCamaroZ28Fan View Post
That was Chevy before they let the Camaro Team take off. We will see in January or March. I think they will bump up the horsepower, and give it better tires, and options as well as 1LE and ZL1 advantages. Not 2 sure about weight, maybe next generation.
Keep in mind that the team that engineers the Small Block V8 and the team that engineers Camaro are separate teams. In VERY close communication, but separate teams. Point being that the Camaro team does not develop the engines are implement new engine tech. The engine team, located about 40 miles away does that and works with the Camaro and Corvette teams to fine tune for their applications. So "letting the Camaro Team take off" is not the issue. "What tools are available from the wizards in Pontiac?" is the issue.

Now having said that, bumping it a few hp is, as most of you are well aware, something that can be done in the "fine tuning".
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 09:14 AM   #375
ModernCamaroZ28Fan
LT1_Radenso
 
ModernCamaroZ28Fan's Avatar
 
Drives: a 2 spd water bottle
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In your trunk
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinjlm View Post
Keep in mind that the team that engineers the Small Block V8 and the team that engineers Camaro are separate teams. In VERY close communication, but separate teams. Point being that the Camaro team does not develop the engines are implement new engine tech. The engine team, located about 40 miles away does that and works with the Camaro and Corvette teams to fine tune for their applications. So "letting the Camaro Team take off" is not the issue. "What tools are available from the wizards in Pontiac?" is the issue.

Now having said that, bumping it a few hp is, as most of you are well aware, something that can be done in the "fine tuning".
That's great. Still pretty confident about 465 Horses and Traction for drag.
ModernCamaroZ28Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 01:39 PM   #376
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
Add 15hp/15torque,drop 25lbs and throw in the 10speed auto. That'll run like a champ.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 09:19 PM   #377
metros11

 
Drives: 2018 SS 1LE
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 776
Without a doubt.
metros11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 09:56 PM   #378
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by NASTY99Z28 View Post
Add 15hp/15torque,drop 25lbs and throw in the 10speed auto. That'll run like a champ.
I think the GT500 going from iron block to aluminum was the only time a pony car got lighter within the same generation. Can't recall another instance. If anything, I would expect it to gain some weight with the (slightly) heavier A10 and the addition of port injection.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.