You are browsing camaro6 
05-16-2015, 08:43 PM
|
#15 |
 
Drives: Camaro 1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 489
|
Expecting 4 flat 0-60 and low, low 12s in the 1/4 mile.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 09:01 PM
|
#16 | |
|
GM repeat offender...
Drives: 16 2SS Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Grandview, Texas
Posts: 1,474
|
Quote:
That would be AWESOME!!!
__________________
'16 2SS, Summit White. A8. MRC. NPP.
Ordered:09/03/15. Received 12/22/15 INCOMING: ‘22 ZL1, Satin Steel. A10. PDR. Ordered: 03/02/22. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 10:20 PM
|
#17 |
|
Moderator.ca
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
 |
In a thread back on Camaro5, I said that I am trying to come up with a reason for why the 6th gen won't be posting nearly identical times to the ATS-V. And with all that I've seen today ... I still don't have a good reason for why it wouldn't. But I just have a hard time accepting that it would be that quick. I like to be conservative in my estimates -that way it becomes a good thing if I'm wrong. So all that said ...
I'm thinking ... 0-60 in 4.1 1/4 in 12.4 The V6, maybe 5.5 & 13.6? And the T4 bringing up the rear at 5.7 & 14 flat
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 10:25 PM
|
#18 |
            
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
SS auto : 0-60 4.1 seconds 1/4 mile 12.3.
V6 auto: 0-60 5.3 seconds 1/4 mile 13.6 T4 auto: 0-60 5.7 seconds 1/4 mile 14 flat
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 10:37 PM
|
#19 |
Drives: 2020 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,335
|
If the overall gearing with the 20" tires is the same with the M6 as the Gen5 I would say 4.3 and 12.8 for the SS. I am thinking GM will put more fuel economy oriented gearing in the Camaro vs the ATS-V, which also has 18" wheels. The A6 may drop those numbers a tenth.
__________________
2020 ZL1 1LE [Moroso SC Expansion Tank, otherwise stock]
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 10:52 PM
|
#20 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
It's an A8. And the current car will run a 12.8. 12.9 even in rags. Not sure how you think another 30 hp and 200 lbs less will equate to a tenth ?
At least a half second over the outgoing car... Driver error not included. Compared to the previous auto l99 the difference is going to be in another universe. If the new v6 weighs in around 35-3600 lbs at 335 hp will give the 5th gen SS auto a hard time. |
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 10:54 PM
|
#21 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2ss Join Date: May 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 1,559
|
The stingray is getting high 11s bone stock. The A8 6gen Camaro will run low 12s, and we will have a hero run of 11.9.
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 11:01 PM
|
#22 | |
|
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
Dare I say this could go even lower than 11.9 with negative DA, amazing prep and driver? A mag should take this car to atco or englishtown next year in the spring and pay Evan Smith to drive it lol. In the bench racing world ( which means little ) it's looking like a beast. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 12:01 AM
|
#23 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
Mag times will get low-mid 12's out of the A8 and hero times will be mid-high 11's.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 12:07 AM
|
#24 | |
|
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2ss Join Date: May 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 1,559
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 09:25 AM
|
#25 |
 |
What ever the ATS v can do I assume the camaro SS can do.
__________________
2008 Blk C6 Z51 NPP M6/2008 Silver CTS AWD FE2 304hp
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 10:14 AM
|
#26 |
 Drives: Just a few! Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay City MI
Posts: 118
|
The 2016 Camaro SS LT will run a 12.4 at best on average. The same engine in the A8 C7 weighs 3,300 lbs which is much lighter and it's advertised quarter times are 12.1. Now someone who shows a stock car running 11.7 we can find a slug running 12.5. Nothing wrong with low to mid 12s, after all GM didn't advertise the ZL1 nor Z28 breaking 11,s although we can find them or with very few mods get there. Now a 2016 with a SL7 would be a dream!
I like the looks of new Camaro, good job GM, |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 10:44 AM
|
#27 |
 Drives: Car Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Southeast
Posts: 30
|
I personally believe we see 4.1-4.3 0-60 times. The SS sedan that is much heavier and has an LS3 iregularly hits 0-60 in 4.5 to 4.7.
I see Car and Driver posting 3.9 to 4.0 with their roll out metrics and normalization... |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 11:16 AM
|
#28 |
Drives: '04 Elantra GT, '86 Jetta Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5
|
Any chance the A8 T4 is faster/quicker than the ecoboost Mustang?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
