Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2015, 11:47 AM   #15
cal45

 
cal45's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Blue Velvet Metallic ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Orlando & Flagler Beach,FL
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Motorsports View Post
Prior to the ZL1 there was an unspoken rule that the Camaro couldn't have more power than the Vette. Throughout the years there are numerous examples of the Camaro having the same engine/drive train as the Vette yet the power numbers were rated lower. Then the ZL1 came along to fight the GT500 and for the first time you could get a Camaro that had more power than the Vette and at a similar price point. Now that that barrier has been broken I don't see why there would be any need to rate the Camaro lower anymore. The C7 is truly a world class sports car and has a lot more to offer than just it's HP rating.
If you are comparing the ZL1 to a C6 Corvette, the proper model to compare it to is the ZR1, as both models are supercharged. There the Corvette again is at the top of the HP page.
cal45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 12:07 PM   #16
NC_SS

 
NC_SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 M6 Camaro SS (RIP)
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragnar View Post
Vette guys would be unhappy that a Camaro had the same power...
The Z/28 pretty much broke all of that up. The people who typically buy Vettes don't buy Camaro's, and people who typically buy Camaro's don't buy Vettes.

GM has always worried about one taking market share from the other, when they are in completely different markets in terms of buyer. So a 460 HP LT1 in a Camaro wouldn't be any different than the LS7 in the Z. It isn't like the SS would be as fast as a stock Stingray, even if the power is the same.
NC_SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 12:08 PM   #17
woodside783
Casey Woodside
 
woodside783's Avatar
 
Drives: a very fun car
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tn
Posts: 1,906
a version of the lt1 i wonder what that means 456hp?
__________________
Instagram @caseywoodside
http://youtu.be/CSc9aPh_X_w
woodside783 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 12:18 PM   #18
krisprz2010camaross

 
krisprz2010camaross's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2ss/Rs Transformers
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Yorba Linda, California
Posts: 1,564
I wonder if they are going to make the automatic lose power again....
__________________
YouTube:Krisprz garage
Insta:kris__perez & krisprz_garage
LS3 conversion
Vararam intake(tune model)
Kooks LT headers & cats delete
Corsa ZL1 3" exhaust
RedBarn Racing Tune
CMS Stage 3 Cam
AFR CNC ported heads
MSD Spark plug wires
LNC-2000 Launch controller
NGK TR6 Spark Plugs
1le strut tower brace-TPIS spacers
Nick Williams 102mm throttle body
Fast lsxr 102 intake manifold
Slp 25% UDP
Katech Tensioner Pulley
Circle D 3600-3700 multi disk Stall
GM 3.91 gears
DDS carbon fiber driveshaft
ZL1 fuel pump & injectors
Flex fuel sensor(91/E85)
https://wheelwell.com/kris-perez
krisprz2010camaross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 12:29 PM   #19
White14SS
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 159
What would be cool is if they pulled a dodge say f it and give it 500hp and out power their flagship like the hellcat did to the viper. I know the viper is still faster though, the challenger is so heavy and the charger weighs about as much as an m1 abrams.
White14SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 12:46 PM   #20
LOBBS
 
LOBBS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by krisprz2010camaross View Post
I wonder if they are going to make the automatic lose power again....
LT1 has VVT and AFM with both the stick and auto in the Vette so I doubt it.
LOBBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 05:53 PM   #21
Algeron

 
Algeron's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 ZL1 Convertible, 1998 Z28
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 915
I spoke to a shop manager today, and they are hearing the Camaro will be around 440 hp. I am guessing that will be the manual, and the auto will be lower.
__________________
2023 Rapid Blue ZL1 Convertible
Algeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 06:14 PM   #22
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,709
You guys act like the corvette guys said "whew! The 5th gen Camaro has 4 less hp than us! GM has saved us all!"

It's obvious GM isn't "protecting" the corvette. Not to mention the massive decrease in hp they did when they shoved an LS7 into the camaro
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 07:01 PM   #23
Apex Motorsports
 
Apex Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by cal45 View Post
If you are comparing the ZL1 to a C6 Corvette, the proper model to compare it to is the ZR1, as both models are supercharged. There the Corvette again is at the top of the HP page.
The point was not to compare models. We were discussing how the top tier Camaro has historically been sandbagged because they didn't want it stepping on the Corvette's toes. When the ZL1 came out it was the first time that GM approved a Camaro with more power than the low end of the Corvette. There was no danger of the ZL1 stealing ZR1 sales, the risk was at the bottom end of the Corvette line up.
Apex Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 07:05 PM   #24
Apex Motorsports
 
Apex Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by krisprz2010camaross View Post
I wonder if they are going to make the automatic lose power again....
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOBBS View Post
LT1 has VVT and AFM with both the stick and auto in the Vette so I doubt it.
Yeah, the reason the auto has a lower power rating now is because it is a different engine. Factory power numbers are at the crank not the rear wheels so the trans is not a factor. With the LT1 there is no need for two different engines so the power numbers should be the same for both. Fuel economy numbers should be a little different though.
Apex Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 07:12 PM   #25
cal45

 
cal45's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Blue Velvet Metallic ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Orlando & Flagler Beach,FL
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Motorsports View Post
The point was not to compare models. We were discussing how the top tier Camaro has historically been sandbagged because they didn't want it stepping on the Corvette's toes. When the ZL1 came out it was the first time that GM approved a Camaro with more power than the low end of the Corvette. There was no danger of the ZL1 stealing ZR1 sales, the risk was at the bottom end of the Corvette line up.
Agree - but I assume GM allowed this as they had the ZR1 ready to claim top HP model and keep the Camaro at #2 in their HP stable.
cal45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 08:00 PM   #26
LOBBS
 
LOBBS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Motorsports View Post
Yeah, the reason the auto has a lower power rating now is because it is a different engine. Factory power numbers are at the crank not the rear wheels so the trans is not a factor. With the LT1 there is no need for two different engines so the power numbers should be the same for both. Fuel economy numbers should be a little different though.
My point was that with VVT and AFM present in the LT1 regardless of the transmission there won't be a need for a 2nd less potent engine.
LOBBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2015, 09:09 AM   #27
Apex Motorsports
 
Apex Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOBBS View Post
My point was that with VVT and AFM present in the LT1 regardless of the transmission there won't be a need for a 2nd less potent engine.
I understood. I was agreeing with you.
Apex Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2015, 09:24 AM   #28
Criticalmass
 
Drives: 2014 Ford Mustang GT Premium
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Motorsports View Post
The point was not to compare models. We were discussing how the top tier Camaro has historically been sandbagged because they didn't want it stepping on the Corvette's toes. When the ZL1 came out it was the first time that GM approved a Camaro with more power than the low end of the Corvette. There was no danger of the ZL1 stealing ZR1 sales, the risk was at the bottom end of the Corvette line up.
GM has other plans for the upcoming C8 Corvette. From the sounds of it, they may be spinning off the Corvette division into its own brand and their top of the line 'vette will be mid-engined. While the lower end cars will be similar to what the c7's are today.

So I'll bet that they are not as worried about overlap as they once were. The mid-engined vette is rumored to come in around 150k or so when it hits.
Criticalmass is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.