10-05-2016, 10:25 AM | #127 |
Drives: 6th gen Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,678
|
|
10-05-2016, 10:31 AM | #128 |
Drives: Four wheels and an engine Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Garage
Posts: 363
|
Very good month of September for Camaro, in fact, it is the second best selling September since the Camaro returned (Sept 2011 - 6994).
The year end incentives truly helped move the 2016s that had been sitting on lots for a long time. Begs the question, had GM set the price more competitively and advertised better from the beginning, would they have had to have such a big year end clearance on the 6th Gen? PS, I own a Camaro. |
10-05-2016, 10:37 AM | #129 |
Drives: 6th gen Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,678
|
imo the car is worth what they were asking, they are just in the middle of changing public perception where ppl would pay more for a BMW M2. which once you drop the stigma, is ludacris
|
10-05-2016, 10:41 AM | #130 |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
It may be worth what they're asking.
The problem is that the demographic that normally buys a Camaro and GM has traditionally targeted with the Camaro..IE the younger blue collar/professional, seems to be struggling with the price that is being asked for the SS. The Camaro should not try to be a BMW, or "changing the public perception"..it's a Camaro, and it always will be. GM has a M2 fighter in the ATS-V..the Camaro shouldn't try to be all things for all people. |
10-05-2016, 10:50 AM | #131 | |
Drives: 6th gen Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,678
|
Quote:
isnt the ATS-V the M3 fighter tho? from what is see the M3/M4 goes after two audiences. one that wants luxury-performance, then those that want performance...you can lump the M2 ppl in there too. the ATS-V goes for the luxury/perf and the camaro offers the performance component with a much more attractive price. also different than before, quality isn't compromised with price. they are able to keep luxury and quality seperate categories. |
|
10-05-2016, 10:59 AM | #132 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Really the M2 was supposed to "fix" the M4 disappointments. So who know what the M3/4 actually goes against since there are now a host of cars that are better in all respects to it.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
||
10-05-2016, 12:21 PM | #133 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
If that is the case I think that is a huge mistake. Sorry I know you guys love your camaros but it is NOT a corvette. As someone who has dreamed of owning a brand new vette if it does move up market with a MR C8, and they expect the Camaro SS to "fill" that void where the Stingray was sorry, not going to get my money. |
|
10-05-2016, 12:36 PM | #134 | |
Drives: 86 Mustang GT Convertible Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
Mustang vs Camaro Sales in Europe 2014 YTD 556 Mustang 932 Camaro 2015 YTD 4,710 Mustang 367 Camaro 2016 YTD August 11,383 Mustang 317 Camaro |
|
10-05-2016, 01:13 PM | #135 | |
|
Quote:
Performance is currently within 9/10, sure it's still considered a 2+2 but don't think that matters to anyone except insurance companies. Changing peoples perception of it is really the only obstacle. But that's always a slow process. This is all just conjecture anyway. For all we know the MR Corvette could be a separate model until to itself.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
10-05-2016, 01:19 PM | #136 | |
Drives: 2016 Summit White Camaro 2SS Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 759
|
Quote:
People keep saying "It's just a Camaro, and will never be seen in the same category as a BMW", "It's not a Corvette, it is just a Camaro and always will be". Some people are all about the name plate and the perceived "prestige". I don't get it myself, give me 90% of what those offer at a much lower price and I couldn't be happier. When I am zipping around in my car with a smile on my face, I promise you that I am not thinking "man I wish this had a Corvette or BMW badge on it". |
|
10-05-2016, 01:28 PM | #137 | |
Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
10-05-2016, 01:47 PM | #138 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
|
|
10-05-2016, 01:58 PM | #139 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
And BTW I didn't say the Camaro was going to replace it...just target the market which Corvette has been growing out of for awhile, the ones who want an affordable world class sports car but actually don't really care about track performance. If the MR C8 is the only one and costs close $100k, where are all those buyers going to go? They aren't moving that far up in the market. Also I'm not saying I want this to happen too. I'd prefer a standalone model.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
||
10-05-2016, 01:59 PM | #140 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Red Hot Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Greater Los Angeles
Posts: 176
|
I think this discussion can end with this..
__________________
2SS Red Hot 6 Speed, NPP, MRC, 5 sploke black low-gloss, glow-tie
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|